Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T17:58:14.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Leucothoe cathalaa sp. nov. (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Leucothoidae), a new bathyal benthic species from the Le Danois Bank (‘El Cachucho’ Spanish MPA), southern Bay of Biscay

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 June 2012

Inmaculada Frutos*
Affiliation:
Instituto Español de Oceanografía, C.O. Santander, P. Box 240, 39080 Santander, Spain Departamento de Zoología y Antropología Física, Universidad de Alcalá,28871 Alcalá de Henares, Spain
Jean Claude Sorbe
Affiliation:
Station Marine (UMR 5805, CNRS/UB1), 2 rue Jolyet, 33120 Arcachon, France
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: I. Frutos, Instituto Español de Oceanografía, C.O. Santander, P. Box 240, 39080 Santander, Spain email: inma.frutos@st.ieo.es

Abstract

A new bathyal leucothoid amphipod, Leucothoe cathalaa sp. nov., is described and illustrated based on specimens collected at the Le Danois Bank (‘El Cachucho’ Marine Protected Area), southern Bay of Biscay. This species can be distinguished from the other species of the genus Leucothoe by the hardly visible eyes (translucent ocelli, in preserved specimens); antenna 1 with minute accessory flagellum; coxae 1–3 with 2 serrations on posterodistal margin; epimeron 3 posterodistal corner produced, bifid, with one seta between blunt lobes and telson apex pointed without accessory teeth. In live specimens, the eyes are easily visible, each represented as a rounded whitish-pigmented spot. The new species has been found living on fine sandy soft-bottoms between 486 and 574 m depth at the top of the bank. An identification key to the deep Atlantic European species of Leucothoe is provided, as well as ecological and biological comments.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barnard, J.L. (1961) Gammaridean Amphipoda from depths of 400 to 6000 m. Galathea Report 5, 23128.Google Scholar
Barnard, J.L. and Karaman, G.S. (1991) The families and genera of marine gammaridean Amphipoda (except marine gammaroids) Part 1. Records of the Australian Museum Supplement 13 (Part 1), 1417.Google Scholar
Bellan-Santini, D. (1998) Ecology. In Ruffo, S. (ed.) The Amphipoda of the Mediterranean, Part 4. Mémoires de l'Institut Océanographique, Monaco, pp. 869893.Google Scholar
Bellan-Santini, D. (2007) New amphipods of hydrothermal vent environments on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, Azores triple junction zone. Journal of Natural History 41, 567596.Google Scholar
Bonnier, J. (1896) Édriophthalmes. Résultats scientifiques de la campagne du ‘Caudan’ dans le Golfe de Gascogne. Annales de l'Université de Lyon 26, 527689.Google Scholar
Cartes, J.E. and Sorbe, J.C. (1999) Deep-water amphipods from the Catalan Sea slope (western Mediterranean): bathymetric distribution, assemblage composition and biological characteristics. Journal of Natural History 33, 11331158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chevreux, E. (1908) Diagnoses d'amphipodes nouveaux provenant des campagnes de la Princesse-Alice dans l'Atlantique nord. Bulletin de l'Institut Océanographique 121, 115.Google Scholar
Chevreux, E. (1919–1920) Note préliminaire sur les amphipodes recueillis par les expéditions du Travailleur et du Talisman (1880–1883). Bulletin du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle 7, 113.Google Scholar
Crowe, S.E. (2006) A redescription of Leucothoe spinicarpa (Abildgaard, 1789) based on material from the North Atlantic (Amphipoda, Leucothoidae). Zootaxa 1170, 5768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunha, M.R., Sorbe, J.C. and Bernardes, C. (1997) On the structure of the neritic suprabenthic communities from the Portuguese continental margin. Marine Ecology Progress Series 157, 119137.Google Scholar
Dewicke, A. (2002) Hyperbenthic communities of the North Sea. PhD thesis. University of Gent, Gent, Belgium.Google Scholar
Garm, A. (2004) Revising the definition of the crustacean seta and setal classification system based on examinations of the mouthpart setae of seven species of decapods. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 142, 233252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurjanova, E. (1951) Amphipoda Gammaridae from the seas of USSR and vicinity. Opredeliteli Faune SSR Zoologicheskii Institut Akademii Nauk SSSR 41, 11029. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Heredia, B., Pantoja, J., Tejedor, A. and Sánchez, F. (2008) La primera gran Área Marina Protegida en España. El Cachucho, un oasis de vida en el Cantábrico. Ambienta 76, 1017.Google Scholar
Kamenskaya, O.E. (1979) Deep sea Amphipoda (Amphipoda, Gammaridea) collected from drifting station ‘North-Pole 22’. In Vinogradov, M.E. and Melnikov, I.A. (eds) Biologiya Tsentral'nogo Arktichestogo Bassejna. Moscow: Nauk, pp. 241251. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Lagardère, J.P. (1977) Recherches sur la distribution verticale et sur l'alimentation des Crustacés Décapodes benthiques de la pente continentale du golfe de Gascogne. Analyse des groupements carcinologiques. Bulletin du Centre d'Etudes et de Recherches Scientifiques, Biarritz 11, 367440.Google Scholar
Marques, J.C. and Bellan-Santini, D. (1993) Biodiversity in the ecosystem of the Portuguese continental shelf: distributional ecology and the role of benthic amphipods. Marine Biology 115, 555564.Google Scholar
Oldevig, H. (1959) Arctic, subarctic and Scandinavian amphipods in the collections of the Swedish Natural History Museum in Stockholm. Göteborgs Kungliga Vetenskaps-och Vitterhets-Samhälles Handlingar Series B 8, 1132.Google Scholar
Sánchez, F., Serrano, A., Parra, S., Ballesteros, M. and Cartes, J.E. (2008) Habitat characteristics as determinant of the structure and spatial distribution of epibenthic and demersal communities of Le Danois Bank (Cantabrian Sea, N Spain). Journal of Marine Systems 72, 6486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez, F., Serrano, A. and Gómez Ballesteros, M. (2009) Photogrammetric quantitative study of habitat and benthic communities of deep Cantabrian Sea hard grounds. Continental Shelf Research 29, 11741188.Google Scholar
Sorbe, J.C. (1983) Description d'un traîneau destiné à l'échantillonnage quantitatif étagé de la faune suprabenthique néritique. Annales de l'Institut Océanographique Paris 59, 117126.Google Scholar
Thomas, J.D. and Klebba, K.N. (2006) Studies of commensal leucothoid amphipods: two new sponge-inhabiting species from South Florida and the Western Caribbean. Journal of Crustacean Biology 26, 1322.Google Scholar
Thomas, J.D. and Klebba, K.N. (2007) New species and host associations of commensal leucothoid amphipod from coral reefs in Florida and Belize (Crustacea, Amphipoda). Zootaxa 1494, 144.Google Scholar
Thomas, J.D. and Krapp-Schickel, T. (2011) A new species of leucothoid amphipod, Anamixis bananarama, sp. n., from shallow coral reefs in French Polynesia (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Leucothoidae). ZooKeys 92, 18.Google Scholar
Vallet, C. and Dauvin, J.C. (1995) Qualitative and quantitative composition of the suprabenthic amphipods from the English Channel. Polskie Archiwum Hydrobiologii 42, 461484.Google Scholar
Vanquickelberge, V. (2005) Spatial distribution and biodiversity patterns of the hyperbenthos along NE Atlantic continental margins. PhD thesis. University of Gent, Gent, Belgium.Google Scholar
White, K.N. (2011) A taxonomic review of Leucothoidae (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Zootaxa 3078, 1113.Google Scholar
White, K.N. and Reimer, J.D. (2012a) Commensal Leucothoidae (Crustacea, Amphipoda) of the Ryukyu Archipelago, Japan. Part I: ascidian-dwellers. ZooKeys 163, 1355.Google Scholar
White, K.N. and Reimer, J.D. (2012b) Commensal Leucothoidae (Crustacea, Amphipoda) of the Ryukyu Archipelago, Japan. Part II: ascidian-dwellers. ZooKeys 166, 158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, K.N. and Reimer, J.D. (2012c) Commensal Leucothoidae (Crustacea, Amphipoda) of the Ryukyu Archipelago, Japan. Part III: coral rubble-dwellers. ZooKeys 173, 1150.Google Scholar