Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T00:20:09.995Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Distribution and Seasonal Population Changes of Campecopea Hirsuta [Isopoda: Flabellifera]

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Clare E. Harvey
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University College of Swansea

Extract

Campecopea hirsuta (Montagu) occurs in rock crevices, and among barnacles and the lichen Lichina in south-west Britain. It is particularly abundant on shores ex-posed to wave action, occurring most commonly at about M.T.L. and below on shallow slopes, and from M.T.L. to H.W.N. on steep slopes. Young Campecopea of about 1–5 mm long are released in late summer. Females attain a maximum length of 35 mm and males 4–0 mm, each having a life span of no more than 1½ years.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bruce, J. R., Colman, J. S. & Jones, N. S., 1963. Marine Fauna of the Isle of Man. 307 pp. Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Colman, J. S., 1933. The nature of the intertidal zonation of plants and animals. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 18, pp. 435–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colman, J. S., 1940. The faunas inhabiting intertidal seaweeds. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 24, pp. 129–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edward, T., 1876. Selections from the fauna of Banffshire. In Smiles S., Life of a Scotch Naturalist, pp. 129.Google Scholar
Hesse, M., 1873. Memoire Sur Des Crustaces Rares On Nouveaux Des Cotes De France. Annls Sci. nat. sool., T. 17, pp. 135.Google Scholar
Kensler, C. B., 1967. Dessication resistance of intertidal crevice species as a factor in their zonation. J. Anim. Ecol., Vol. 36, pp. 391406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J. R. 1964. The Ecology of Rocky Shores. 323 pp. The English Universities Press.Google Scholar
Marine Biological Association, 1957. Plymouth Marine Fauna. 3rd edition. 457 pp. Plymouth.Google Scholar
Maury, T., 1929. Tanaidaces et Isopodes des cotes normandes (Exl. Epicarides) Crustaces marins, d'eaux saumatres et d'eaux douces. Bull. Soc. linn. Normandie, T. 1, pp. 152–61.Google Scholar
Monod, T., 1932. Tanaidaces et Isopodes Aquatiques de l'Afrique Occidentales et Septentrional 3e Partie. Sphaeromatidae. Mem. Soc. Sci. nat. Maroc, T. 29, pp. 191.Google Scholar
Naylor, G. L., 1930. Notes on the distribution of Lichina confinis and L. pygniaea in the Plymouth district. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 16, pp. 909–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panouse, J. B., 1940. Notes biologique sur les spheromiens. I. Campecopea hirsuta Montagu. Bull. Soc. zool. Fr., T. 65, pp. 93–5.Google Scholar
Tetart, J., 1962. fitude morphologie de Campecopea hirsuta (Montagu). Bull. Soc. linn. Normandie, T. 3, pp. 158–64.Google Scholar
Wieser, W., 1963. Adaptations of two intertidal isopods. II. Comparison between Campecopea hirsuta and Naesa bidentata (Sphaeromatidae). J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 43, PP. 97112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar