Hostname: page-component-797576ffbb-bqjwj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-12-07T04:28:42.629Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

Upper Saxon (Chemnitz dialect)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2013

Sameer ud Dowla Khan
Department of Linguistics, Reed
Constanze Weise
Department of History, Dickinson
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]


Upper Saxon (Obersächsisch /ɵːpoˁˈsɛksʃ/) refers to a group of dialects spoken by over two million people in the Free State of Saxony in eastern Germany. It is considered one of the eastern branches of Central German (Wiesinger 1983, Lewis 2009), with major phonological, morphological, and lexical differences from Standard German and other regional dialects.

Illustrations of the IPA
Copyright © International Phonetic Association 2013 

Upper Saxon (Obersächsisch /ɵːpoˁˈsɛksʃ/) refers to a group of dialects spoken by over two million people in the Free State of Saxony in eastern Germany. It is considered one of the eastern branches of Central German (Wiesinger Reference Wiesinger, Besch, Knoop, Putschke and Wiegand1983, Lewis Reference Lewis2009), with major phonological, morphological, and lexical differences from Standard German and other regional dialects.

The transcriptions below reflect the speech of middle-aged speakers from Chemnitz, speaking an urban variety of the local Vorerzgebirgisch /foˁːˈaˁːtskəbʌˁːʃ/ dialect, which is described in Bergmann (Reference Bergmann1990: 292) as transitional between the Meissen (Meißnisch), Vogtland (Vogtländisch), and Ore Mountain (Erzgebirgisch) dialects. Due to both this transitional nature and a lesser degree of influence from Standard German (Hochdeutsch) than what is seen in other urban centers (e.g. Leipzig, Dresden), the Chemnitz dialect is largely intelligible to speakers of other varieties of Upper Saxon while still preserving the most salient phonological and phonetic features recognizable to speakers of other varieties of German as defining characteristics of Upper Saxon.

Of course, as the degree of influence from regional dialects and from Standard German varies greatly across speakers and contexts, this illustration should not be taken to be representative of all speakers in Chemnitz, let alone of all varieties of Upper Saxon. See Bergmann (Reference Bergmann1965) for a detailed historical description of this Vorerzgebirgisch variety, Keller (Reference Keller1960), Bergmann (Reference Bergmann1990: 312), Kügler (Reference Kügler2005: 18; 2007: 11), and Rues et al. (2007: 91–99) for descriptions of and references on other varieties of Upper Saxon, and Kleber (Reference Kleber2011) for the pronunciation of Standard German by Upper Saxon speakers. Examples of Standard German are given for comparison of selected forms, and are based on Rues et al.'s (2007) transcription scheme.


Voicing and aspiration

Unlike Standard German, Upper Saxon lacks a voicing contrast. Underlyingly, obstruents are voiceless and sonorants are voiced (Becker Reference Becker1942: 104, 127–128; Bergmann Reference Bergmann1965: 43, 1987: 18, 1990: 309–310; Zimmermann Reference Zimmermann1992: 102–107; Rues et al. Reference Rues, Redecker, Koch, Wallraff and Simpson2007: 94; Kleber Reference Kleber2011). Unaspirated stops /p tk/ can be partially or fully voiced [b d ɡ] between sonorants, as in Figure 1 and Figure 3 below; word-finally, they can vary widely from fully voiced stops to voiceless aspirated stops [pʰ tʰ kʰ], as in Figure 2, but are most commonly realized as voiceless unaspirated stops (Bergmann Reference Bergmann1965: 43; Albrecht Reference Albrecht1983: 11), as in Figure 3. The sole aspiration distinction /kʰ k/ is restricted to initial position (Bergmann Reference Bergmann1965: 43), e.g. /ˈkʰʌsə/ Kasse ‘cash register’ vs. /ˈkʌsə/ Gasse ‘lane’ above. Neighboring varieties of Central and Upper German are also described as having a similar lack of a contrast in either voicing or aspiration (i.e. fortis vs. lenis) outside of velars, e.g. Thuringian (Spangenberg Reference Spangenberg1990: 270), East Franconian (Rowley Reference Rowley1990: 400), and Swabian (Hiller Reference Hiller1995: 34–35).

Footnote 1

Figure 1 Spectrogram of the phrase /tiː ˈɵːmɪʃ ˈtɛmpn/ die römischen Tempeln ‘the Roman temples’, showing full voicing of /t p/ in Tempelntɛmpn/ (Standard German Tempeltɛmp/).

Figure 2 Spectrogram of the phrase /ən ˈɵːtəs tleːt/ ein rotes Kleid ‘a red dress’, showing full voicing of /t/ in /ˈɵːtəs/ rotes ‘red’ and aspiration of the final /t/ in /tleːt/ Kleid ‘dress’, as well as the coronal articulation of the pre-lateral consonant.

Figure 3 Spectrogram of the phrase /hʌst tʉː ˈʋʌˁːkləʃ ɛʃt/ hast du wirklich Recht ‘(do you think) you're really right?’, showing full voicing of /k/ in /ˈʋʌˁːkləʃ/ wirklich ‘really’ and retraction of the final /t/ in /ɛʃt/ Recht ‘right’ due to the preceding /ʃ/.

Fricatives /f s ʃ χ/ can be partially or fully voiced [v z ʒ ʁ] between sonorants, but remain largely voiceless elsewhere. Fricatives /χ h/ occur in complementary distribution: /h/ occurs as the onset of stressed syllables and word-initially while /χ/ occurs elsewhere.

Due to the lack of a voicing contrast, Upper Saxon has many homophone pairs whose Standard German cognates form minimal pairs, as illustrated in the list below. The only vestige of a voicing distinction in Upper Saxon is the aspiration contrast /kʰ k/, which often corresponds to /k ɡ/ in Standard German; however, there are instances of Upper Saxon ‘lenis’ /k/ corresponding to Standard German ‘fortis’ /k/ instead of to ‘lenis’ /ɡ/, e.g. Upper Saxon /koˁːp/ Korb ‘basket’ and Standard German /kɔ

p/ ([kʰɔ

p]). Like most varieties of German, Upper Saxon exhibits only voiceless obstruents word-finally; in Standard German, this is due to final devoicing (Brockhaus Reference Brockhaus1995), while in Upper Saxon, this is due to the lack of a voicing contrast to begin with.


Neither voicing nor aspiration is contrastive in clusters (Bergmann Reference Bergmann1965: 110), even in the velar place of articulation, producing homophones where Standard German has (near-) minimal pairs of voicing as in the examples below. In initial clusters with /l/, stops /t k/ do not contrast and can vary freely, e.g. /klʌːs/~/tlʌːs/ Glas ‘glass’ (Goepfert Reference Goepfert1878: 25; Sievers Reference Sievers1885: 160; Bergmann Reference Bergmann1965: 110; Blevins & Grawunder Reference Blevins and Grawunder2009); the /tl/ variant is a salient marker of Chemnitz speakers (Wallner-Zimmer Reference Wallner-Zimmer1999; Blevins & Grawunder Reference Blevins and Grawunder2009: 271–272), although it is widespread throughout eastern variants of Central German and Upper German.Footnote 2 In Figure 2, the spectrogram of the phrase /ən ˈ

ɵːtəs tleːt/ ein rotes Kleid ‘a red dress’ reveals a high-frequency (~5 kHz) concentration of burst energy in the onset of /tleːt/ Kleid ‘dress’, indicating a coronal articulation. Final /ʃ/, including the suffixes spelled -ig/-ich/-isch (e.g. /hɔˁː-ʃ/ haarig ‘hairy’), can create clusters not found in Standard German, e.g. /ɛsʃ/ Essig ‘vinegar’, /sɛks-ʃ/ Sächsisch ‘Saxon’, and /sɞnst-ʃ/ sonstig ‘other’ (Bergmann Reference Bergmann1965: 115; Albrecht Reference Albrecht1983: 19; Gilles Reference Gilles2005: 70).


As in Standard German (Kohler Reference Kohler1999: 87–88), the rhotic // occurs only in onsets. In Upper Saxon, it freely varies between a voiced approximant [], a voiced fricative [ʁ], a devoiced fricative [] or trill [], and a voiceless unaspirated uvular stop [q], e.g. /ɞk/ [ɔkʰ] Rock ‘skirt’, /ɵm/ [m]~[m] Rum ‘rum’, and /a/ [a]~[qa] rau ‘rough’. What was historically its coda counterpart only surfaces in Upper Saxon as pharyngealization on the preceding vowel, e.g. /ˈmaˁːəə ˈlɞtə/ mehrere Leutemore people’ vs. /ɪʃ keː nɪʃ maˁːtsʉː ˈʃʉːlə/ ich gehe nicht mehr zu Schule ‘I don't go to school anymore’; in other German varieties known to exhibit pharyngealization, such as Swabian, the coda rhotic is treated as either a pharyngeal approximant [] or pharyngealization on the preceding vowel [ˁ] (Frey Reference Frey1975: 15–16; Hiller Reference Hiller1995: 35; Rues et al. Reference Rues, Redecker, Koch, Wallraff and Simpson2007: 95–98), but consistently as a surface realization of an underlying consonant //. See section ‘Vowels and diphthongs’ below for details of pharyngealization.

Syllabic consonants

As in other colloquial varieties of German, final nasals and laterals can be produced as syllabic // following a stop or fricative (Albrecht Reference Albrecht1983: 19), e.g. /ˈɔˁːpat/ arbeiten ‘to work’, /ˈmʌnt/ Mantel ‘cloak’. Syllabic nasals share the same place of articulation as the preceding consonant, e.g. /ˈhɛlf/ helfen ‘to help’, /ˈtɵk/ ducken ‘to duck’, and /ˈmʌχ/ [ˈmχ] machen ‘to make’. Due to this obligatory assimilation, syllabic nasals can be considered underlyingly underspecified for place. When the syllabic nasal is preceded by another nasal, the two are produced as a single consonant, sometimes with lengthening (Bergmann Reference Bergmann1965: 102), e.g. /kəˈkɞm/ gekommen ‘come’, /kəˈʋɞn/ gewonnen ‘won’, and /kəˈkʌŋ/ gegangen ‘gone’. When the vowel before the two final consonants is long, it is common for the oral consonant to be deleted, e.g. /ˈpɛːp/ beben ‘to shake’ pronounced [pɛːm]. Similar phenomena are also described in colloquial Standard German (Lemke Reference Lemke and Jonach1998; Rues et al. Reference Rues, Redecker, Koch, Wallraff and Simpson2007: 72).

Glottal stop

As in Standard German (Kohler Reference Kohler1999: 86; Rues et al. Reference Rues, Redecker, Koch, Wallraff and Simpson2007: 37), a glottal stop [ʔ] is typically inserted before stressed onset-less vowels both within words, e.g. /teːˈʌːtoˁ/ [teːˈʔɔˁːtoˁ] Theater ‘theater’, /foˁːˈaˁːtskəpʌˁːʃ/ [foˁːˈʔɛːˁtskəpɪːˁʃ] Vorerzgebirgisch, and word-initially regardless of stress, e.g. /ʌm ɵːmt ʋʌˁːt ˈɵːmpɵːt kəˈkɛs/ [ʔʌm ʔɵːmt ʋʌˁːt ˈʔɵːmbɵːt kəˈkɛz] Am Abend wird Abendbrot gegessen ‘Supper is eaten in the evening’.


Due to various mergers, Upper Saxon /ʃ/ can correspond to Standard German /k ɡ ʃ ç/, e.g. /ʋaˁːʃ/ Werk ‘work’, /tsʋaˁːʃ/ Zwerg ‘dwarf’, /tɪʃ/ Tisch ‘table’, and /tɪʃ/ dich ‘you’, cf. Standard German /vɛk/, /tsvɛk/ (underlyingly final /ɡ/, cf. plural /tsvɛɡ-ə/ Zwerge), /tɪʃ/, and /dɪç/ (Spangenberg Reference Spangenberg1990: 274). Its retracted articulation carries over into a following /t/, audible in words such as /ʋʊˁːʃt/ [ʋʊˁʃt] Wurst ‘sausage’. In Figure 3, the spectrogram of the word /ɛʃt/ Recht ‘right’ reveals the lower-frequency burst energy (< 3 kHz) of the /t/ following /ʃ/.

Vowels and diphthongs

Upper Saxon has six long non-pharyngealized vowels /iː eː ɛː ʉː ɵː ʌː/. The vowel chart reflects mean formant values collected via spectrographic analysis.

There are also five short non-pharyngealized vowels /ɪ ɛ ɵ ɞ ʌ/. When unstressed, these vowels optionally reduce to [ə]. Because of the varied formant values reduced vowels can take, no attempt is made in assessing their phonemic quality; all reduced vowels are simply transcribed /ə/. Utterance-final /ə/ is often fronted (e.g. /ˈtɪkə f


/ dicke Frau ‘fat woman’ vs. /ˈtɪkə/ dicke ‘fat’). The vowel chart reflects mean formant values collected via spectrographic analysis.

Pharyngealization is described in various regional dialects of German (e.g. Swabian, see Frey Reference Frey1975: 15–16; Hiller Reference Hiller1995) as well as in variants of Standard German (Lodge Reference Lodge2003). Upper Saxon has six pharyngealized vowels, five of which are long /aˁː ʌˁː ʊˁː oˁː ɔˁː/ and often pronounced as pharyngealized diphthongs [ɛː

ˁ ɪː

ˁ ʊː

ˁ oː

ˁ ɔː

ˁ] in careful speech; compare /aˁː/ [ɛː

ˁ] er ‘he’ in isolation versus in the phrase /jə maˁː aˁː ˈpʉːstətə/ [jə mɛː

ˁ ʔaˁː ˈpʉːstətə] je mehr er pustete ‘the more he blew’.Footnote 3 The monophthongal pronunciation is common in vowels optionally shortened before coda clusters (see Swabian, Hiller Reference Hiller1995); compare /faˁːt/ [fɛː

ˁt] fährt ‘goes’ with /faˁːtʃ/ [faˁtʃ] fertig ‘ready’. The remaining pharyngealized vowel is short unstressed /oˁ/, which can be variously analyzed as pharyngealized high-mid rounded vowel /ɵˁ/, pharyngealized schwa /əˁ/, a sequence of a schwa-like vowel and the rhotic /ə

/ (/ɔr/ in Bergmann Reference Bergmann1965), or a syllabic rhotic /

/ (vocalic /r/ in Bremer Reference Bremer1968: 171).Footnote 4 This is the counterpart of the Standard German lower-mid central vowel /ɐ/. Acoustically, pharyngealization in Upper Saxon is characterized by a significantly lowered F2 frequency and a slightly raised F3 frequency, similar to pharyngealization in other languages, such as Arabic (Obrecht Reference Obrecht1968, Laufer & Baer Reference Laufer and Baer1988, McCarthy Reference McCarthy and Keating1994, Yeou Reference Yeou2001, Al-Masri & Jongman Reference Al-Masri, Jongman, Agwuele, Warren and Park2003, among others), Hebrew (Laufer & Baer Reference Laufer and Baer1988), and Hongyan Qiang (Evans Reference Evans2006).Footnote 5 The vowel chart reflects mean formant values collected via spectrographic analysis.

As in analyses of the Dresden variety of Upper Saxon (Rues et al. Reference Rues, Redecker, Koch, Wallraff and Simpson2007: 92–99), Swabian (Frey Reference Frey1975: 15–16; Hiller Reference Hiller1995), and Standard German (Lodge Reference Lodge2003), these vowels can alternatively be analyzed as sequences of non-pharyngealized vowels followed by a rhotic consonant (Bergmann Reference Bergmann1965) of either uvular /eːiː ʉːʁ ɵː ʌː/ or pharyngeal /eːiː ʉː ɵː ʌː/ articulation. The latter analysis follows that of the pharyngealized short vowels of Swabian [ɛ ɵ ʊ ɔ ɑ], which are interpreted as surface realizations of underlying sequences /eiuo ɑ/ (Hiller Reference Hiller1995: 45–46). While the current description of Upper Saxon treats pharyngealization as a vocalic feature, it can be easily reinterpreted as the realization of an underlying consonant following German linguistic tradition.

In addition to the pharyngealized diphthongs, Upper Saxon has three non-pharyngealized diphthongs /ɞ



/. The vowel chart reflects mean formant values collected via spectrographic analysis.

Anticipatory pharyngealization and retraction

Vowels are allophonically pharyngealized when the vowel in the following syllable is underlyingly pharyngealized /aˁː ʌˁː ʊˁː oˁ oˁː ɔˁː/; Rues et al. (2007: 97–98) transcribes the Dresden variety with pharyngealization spreading in both directions onto consonants and vowels alike (e.g. [fʊˁlˁ

ˁnˁ] verloren ‘lost’, [


ˁ] worden ‘been’, [



ˁd┐] Sport ‘sports’). In a separate but superficially similar process, vowels are somewhat retracted when followed by dorsals /k kʰ ŋ χ

/, with strongest retraction preceding uvulars. Contrastive pharyngealization, allophonic pharyngealization, and allophonic retraction are illustrated in the list below. Some retraction is also seen in vowels following dorsal consonants (e.g. /nʉː/ [nʉː] nun ‘now’ vs. /kʰʉː/ [kʰ

ː] Kuh ‘cow’), with the strongest such retraction seen following /

/ (e.g. /

ʉːm/ [

uːm] Ruhm ‘glory’).

Front rounded vowels

As is also reported in other Central German varieties such as those of Berlin (Peters Reference Peters2004: 209) and Thuringia (Spangenberg Reference Spangenberg1990: 270), as well as in Upper German varieties (Chambers & Trudgill Reference Chambers and Trudgill1998: 168) such as Swabian (Frey Reference Frey1975: 47; Russ Reference Russ1990a: 346–347; Hiller Reference Hiller1995: 36–40), the Upper Saxon counterparts of Standard German front rounded vowels /yː øː ʏ œ/ historically merged with the unrounded vowels /iː eː ɪ ɛ/, e.g. /ˈfeːʃ/ Vögel ‘birds’, /ˈkiːə/ Kühe ‘cows’, cf. Standard German /ˈføːɡ/, /ˈkyːə/ (Bergmann Reference Bergmann1965: 57–64, 1990: 309; Albrecht Reference Albrecht1983: 7–8; Zimmermann Reference Zimmermann1992: 103–104; Rues et al. Reference Rues, Redecker, Koch, Wallraff and Simpson2007: 93). However, Upper Saxon speakers fluent in Standard German occasionally produce front rounded /yː ʏ øː œ/ in cognates of particular Standard German words, e.g. /ˈptoˁ/~/ˈpiːtoˁ/ Brüder ‘brothers’, contrasting them with central rounded vowels /ʉː ɵ ɵː ɞ/, e.g. /ˈløːf/ Löwen ‘lions’ vs. /ˈlɵːf/ laufen ‘to walk’, /tʏn/ dünn ‘thin’ vs. /ˈtɵns/ Dunsel ‘idiot’, cf. Standard German /ˈbʁyːdɐ/, /ˈløːv/, /ˈlaf/, /dʏn/, /ˈdʊnz/.


As in Standard German (Kohler Reference Kohler1999: 87), stress in native roots can be considered primarily initial or penultimate (see Wiese Reference Wiese1996: Section 8), while borrowed and polymorphemic words can exhibit other stress patterns. Because of this potential for ambiguity, stress is transcribed in all polysyllabic examples in this entry. For a detailed account of how stress interacts with intonation in other varieties of Upper Saxon, see Kügler (Reference Kügler2005, 2007) for the Leipzig dialect and Selting (Reference Selting2002a, b), Peters (Reference Peters2004), and Gilles (Reference Gilles2005) for the Dresden dialect.

Transcription of recorded passage

Broad transcription

ˈeːnəs ˈtʌːχəs hʌmʃ toˁ ˈnoˁːtʋɪnt ɵnt tə ˈsɞnə kəˈtsʌŋt, ʋaˁː fɞn ˈpeːttɛn nʉː toˁ ˈʃtaˁːkə ɪs, ɛls ə ˈʋʌntoˁ mɪt nəm ˈʋɔˁːmən ˈmʌnt ʌn foˁˈpeːkʰʌːm. toˁ ˈnoˁːtʋɪnt ɵnt tə ˈsɞnə ʋɔˁːnʃ anʃ tʌs toˁ ˈʃtaˁːkə fɞn ˈpeːttɛn ˈmʌntfɞm ˈʋʌntoˁ ˈkiːʃsɞl. toˁ ˈnoˁːtʋɪnt ˈpʉːstətə ʋʌs tʌs tsɞʃ hiːlt ˈʌːpoˁ jə maˁː aˁː ˈpʉːstətə ɵm sɵː maˁː foˁˈkiːʃtə sɪʃ toˁ ˈʋʌntoˁ ɪn ˈsan ˈmʌnt. toˁ ˈnoˁːtʋɪnt kʌːp ɞf. tʌn hʌts tə ˈsɞnə ɵːχ foˁˈsʉːχt mɪt ʌˁːn ˈʋɔˁːm ˈsɞnʃtɔˁːln. ɵnt ɪm nʉː ʃmɪs toˁ ˈʋʌntoˁ ˈsan ˈmʌnt ʋɛʃ. tɔˁː ˈmɵstə toˁ ˈnoˁːtʋɪnt ˈtsʉːkɛːptʌs tə ˈsɞnə toˁ ˈʃtaˁːkə fɞn ˈpeːt ɪs.

Orthographic version (Standard German)

Eines Tages haben sich der Nordwind und die Sonne gezankt, wer von den beiden denn nun der Stärkere ist, als ein Wanderer mit einem warmen Mantel an, vorbeikam. Der Nordwind und die Sonne waren sich einig, dass der Stärkere von den beiden den Mantel vom Wanderer kriegen soll. Der Nordwind pustete was das Zeug hielt, aber je mehr er pustete, um so mehr verkriechte sich der Wanderer in seinen Mantel. Der Nordwind gab auf. Dann hat es die Sonne auch versucht mit ihren warmen Sonnenstrahlen. Und im Nu schmiss der Wanderer seinen Mantel weg. Da musste der Nordwind zugeben, dass die Sonne die Stärkere von den beiden ist.

English translation

One day the North Wind and the Sun were disputing which of the two is the stronger, when a traveler came along in a warm cloak. The North Wind and the Sun agreed that the stronger of the two should take away the cloak from the traveler. The North Wind blew as hard as he could, but the more he blew, the more the traveler held onto his cloak. The North Wind gave up. Then the Sun tried it with her warm rays. And in an instant the traveler took off his cloak. Thus the North Wind had to concede that the Sun is the stronger of the two.


We would like to sincerely thank our primary consultant, Rico Weise, and our other speakers for their time and patience, as well as Bruce P. Hayes, Russell G. Schuh, Adrian P. Simpson, Ewa Jaworska, and three anonymous reviewers for their valuable input.


1 The Upper Saxon word Tempelntɛmpn/ is composed of the root Tempel plus plural suffix -(e)n, while the Standard German equivalent of the word is Tempeltɛmp/, with a null suffix marking the plural.

2 Even within the Upper Saxon dialect region, there is wide variation in the use of /tl/ instead of /kl/, with strongest usage in Chemnitz and the Ore Mountains (Erzgebirge). Blevins & Grawunder (2009) report that ‘though the TL-region includes . . . Riesa, Meißen, Plauen, and Zwickau, it is not a general feature of speech in Leipzig, Borna, or Altenburg’ (p. 270), and that ‘[i]ndividuals from Chemnitz, Dresden, and Leipzig show evidence of the KL > TL sound change, with the highest rates . . . in speakers from Chemnitz’ (p. 271).

3 Diphthongal pronunciation [ɛːˁ ɪːˁ ʊːˁ oːˁ ɔːˁ], which more closely resembles Standard German [ɛ ɪ ʊ ɔ a], may be associated with upper class speech (Bergmann Reference Bergmann1965: 54), and has become the dominant pronunciation in the urban centers of Leipzig and Dresden (Rues et al. Reference Rues, Redecker, Koch, Wallraff and Simpson2007: 98), e.g. [ɦɪˁ] hier ‘here’.

4 On page 171, Bremer (Reference Bremer1968) notes that ‘man zB in Thüringen-Obersachsen neuerdings ein silbisches, vokalisches (also nicht gerolltes) Zäpfchen-r spricht, ohne vorhergehenden Vokal’ [‘for example, currently in Thuringia and Upper Saxony, a syllabic, vocalic (and thus not trilled) uvular r is produced, without a preceding vowel’ – our translation]

5 Many languages show changes in F1 as well as F2 due to pharyngealization, but the direction of F1 effects is strongly affected by underlying vowel height. The effect of pharyngealization on F3 is more variable across languages.


Albrecht, Karl. 1983. Die Leipziger Mundart: Grammatik und Wörterbuch der Leipziger Volkssprache. Leipzig: Verlag Wolfgang Weidlich. [Originally published 1881, Leipzig: Arnoldische Buchhandlung.]Google Scholar
Al-Masri, Mohammad & Jongman, Allard. 2003. Acoustic correlates of emphasis in Jordanian Arabic: Preliminary results. InAgwuele, Augustine,Warren, Willis & Park, Sang-Hoon (eds.), The 2003 Texas Linguistics Society Conference: Coarticulation in Speech Production and Perception, 96106. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Becker, Horst. 1942. Sächsische Mundartenkunde: Entstehung, Geschichte und Lautstand der Mundarten Sachsens und Nordböhmens. Dresden: Verlag Heimatwerk Sachsen.Google Scholar
Bergmann, Gunter. 1965. Das Vorerzgebirgische: Mundart und Umgangssprache im Industriegebiet um Karl-Marx-Stadt–Zwickau. Halle: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
Bergmann, Gunter. 1987. Kleines Sächsisches Wörterbuch. Munich: Verlag C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
Bergmann, Gunter. 1990. Upper Saxon. In Russ (ed.), 290–312.Google Scholar
Blevins, Juliette & Grawunder, Sven. 2009. *KL > TL sound change in Germanic and elsewhere: Descriptions, explanations, and implications. Linguistic Typology 13 (2), 267303.+TL+sound+change+in+Germanic+and+elsewhere:+Descriptions,+explanations,+and+implications.+Linguistic+Typology+13+(2),+267–303.>Google Scholar
Bremer, Otto. 1968. Beiträge zur Geographie der Deutschen Mundarten. Wiesbaden: Dr. Martin Sändig oHG. [Originally published 1895, Leipzig: Breitkopf & Hartel.]Google Scholar
Brockhaus, Wiebke G. 1995. Final devoicing in the phonology of German. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. & Trudgill, Peter. 1998. Dialectology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Jonathan. 2006. Vowel quality in Hongyan Qiang. Language and Linguistics 7 (4), 731754.Google Scholar
Frey, Eberhard. 1975. Stuttgarter Schwäbisch. Laut- und Formenlehre eines Stuttgarter Ideolekts. Marburg: Elwert.Google Scholar
Gilles, Peter. 2005. Regionale Prosodie im Deutschen. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Goepfert, Ernst. 1878. Die Mundart des sächsischen Erzgebirges nach den Lautverhältnissen, der Wortbildung und Flexion. Leipzig: Verlag von Veit & comp.Google Scholar
Hiller, Markus. 1995. Regressive Pharyngalisierung im Stuttgarter Schwäbischen als C-V-Interaktion. Linguistische Berichte 155, 3364.Google Scholar
Keller, Rudolf Ernst. 1960. German dialects: Phonology and morphology. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Kleber, Felicitas. 2011. Incomplete neutralization and maintenance of phonological contrasts in varieties of Standard German. Ph.D. dissertation, Ludwig Maximilian University.Google Scholar
Kohler, Klaus. 1999. German. In International Phonetic Association (ed.), Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: A guide to the use of the International Phonetic Alphabet, 8689. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kügler, Frank. 2005. Swabian and Upper Saxon intonational patterns. Ph.D. dissertation, Potsdam University.Google Scholar
Kügler, Frank. 2007. The intonational phonology of Swabian and Upper Saxon. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
Laufer, Asher & Baer, Thomas. 1988. The emphatic and pharyngeal sounds in Hebrew and in Arabic. Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research 95/96, 5171.Google Scholar
Lemke, Siegrun. 1998. Phonostilistische Untersuchung zur deutschen Standardaussprache. Zur Realisation der Endungen -en, -em, -el. InJonach, Ingrid (ed.), Interkulturelle Kommunikation (Sprache und Sprechen) 34, 128134. Munich, Basel.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. Paul (ed.). 2009. Ethnologue: Languages of the world, 16th edn.Dallas: SIL International. Online version: Scholar
Lodge, Ken. 2003. A declarative treatment of the phonetics and phonology of German rhymal /r/. Lingua 113 (10), 931951.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 1994. The phonetics and phonology of Semitic pharyngeals. InKeating, Patricia (ed.), Phonological structure and phonetic form: Papers in Laboratory Phonology III, 191234. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Obrecht, Dean H. 1968. Effects of the second formant on the perception of velarized consonants in Arabic. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Peters, Jörg. 2004. Intonatorische Variation im Deutschen. Studien zu ausgewählten Regionalsprachen. Habilitationsschrift, Potsdam University.Google Scholar
Rowley, Anthony R. 1990. East Franconian. In Russ (ed.), 394–416.Google Scholar
Rues, Beate, Redecker, Beate, Koch, Evelyn, Wallraff, Uta & Simpson, Adrian P.. 2007. Phonetische Transkription des Deutschen. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Russ, Charles V. J. 1990a. Swabian. In Russ (ed.), 337–363.Google Scholar
Russ, Charles V. J. (ed.). 1990b. The dialects of modern German: A linguistic survey. Abingdon: Routledge. [Originally published 1989, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.]Google Scholar
Selting, Margaret. 2002a. Dresdener intonation: Treppenkonturen. InLiSt – Interaction and Linguistic Structures 28. Scholar
Selting, Margaret. 2002b. Dresdener Intonation: Fallbögen. InLiSt – Interaction and Linguistic Structures 29. Scholar
Sievers, Eduard. 1885. Grundzüge der Phonetik zur Einführung in das Studium der Lautlehre der indogermanischen Sprachen. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel.Google Scholar
Spangenberg, Karl. 1990. Thuringian. In Russ (ed.), 265–289.Google Scholar
Wallner-Zimmer, Friederike. 1999. Phonetische-phonologische Untersuchungen zur gehobenen Umgangssprache des Obersächsischen. MA thesis, Halle (Saale): Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg.Google Scholar
Wiese, Richard. 1996. The phonology of German. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Wiesinger, Peter. 1983. Die Einteilung der deutschen Dialekte. InBesch, Werner,Knoop, Ulrich,Putschke, Wolfgang & Wiegand, Herbert Ernst (eds.), Dialektologie. Ein Handbuch zur deutschen und allgemeinen Dialektologie, vols. 1–2 of Handbücher zur Sprach und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 807–900. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Yeou, Mohamed. 2001. Pharyngealization in Arabic: Modelling, acoustic analysis, airflow and perception. Revue de La Faculté des Lettres El Jadida 6, 5170.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Gerhard. 1992. Das Sächsische. Muttersprache 102, 97113.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1 Spectrogram of the phrase /tiː ˈɵːmɪʃ ˈtɛmpn/ die römischen Tempeln ‘the Roman temples’, showing full voicing of /t p/ in Tempelntɛmpn/ (Standard German Tempeltɛmp/).

Figure 1

Figure 2 Spectrogram of the phrase /ən ˈɵːtəs tleːt/ ein rotes Kleid ‘a red dress’, showing full voicing of /t/ in /ˈɵːtəs/ rotes ‘red’ and aspiration of the final /t/ in /tleːt/ Kleid ‘dress’, as well as the coronal articulation of the pre-lateral consonant.

Figure 2

Figure 3 Spectrogram of the phrase /hʌst tʉː ˈʋʌˁːkləʃ ɛʃt/ hast du wirklich Recht ‘(do you think) you're really right?’, showing full voicing of /k/ in /ˈʋʌˁːkləʃ/ wirklich ‘really’ and retraction of the final /t/ in /ɛʃt/ Recht ‘right’ due to the preceding /ʃ/.

Supplementary material: File

Khan and Weise sound files

Sound files zip. These audio files are licensed to the IPA by their authors and accompany the phonetic descriptions published in the Journal of the International Phonetic Association. The audio files may be downloaded for personal use but may not be incorporated in another product without the permission of Cambridge University Press

Download Khan and Weise sound files(File)
File 7 MB