Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T16:17:23.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Czech trills revisited: An ultrasound EGG and acoustic study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2014

Phil Howson ,
Ekaterina Komova  and
Bryan Gick
Phil Howson
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, The University of Torontophil.howson@mail.utoronto.ca
Ekaterina Komova
Affiliation:
Department of Asian Studies, The University of British Columbiakatekomova@gmail.com
Bryan Gick
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, The University of British Columbia & Haskins Laboratoriesgick@mail.ubc.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Czech language has two trills produced with the anterior tongue, represented in the Czech orthography as /r/ and /ř/. The phonetic characterization of the latter trill, currently transcribed in the IPA as [], has been especially controversial. The present study uses ultrasound, electroglottography (EGG) and acoustic evidence to examine these trills, with the particular aim of achieving a more phonetically grounded representation of /ř/. In the first part of the paper, ultrasound imaging is used to compare tongue positions between /r/ and /ř/, ruling out tongue height as the key factor distinguishing the two sounds. The second part uses EGG and acoustic evidence to examine phonatory aspects of production. Results implicate vocal fold abduction as the more robust factor distinguishing /r/ from /ř/. Consequently, we posit [] as a more appropriate phonetic characterization of /ř/.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , August 2014 , pp. 115 - 132
Copyright
Copyright © International Phonetic Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barry, William. 1997. Another r-ticle. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 27, 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beskow, Jonas & Sjölander, Kåre. 2009. Wavesurfer (v. 1.8.5).Google Scholar
Bickley, Corine. 1982. Acoustic analysis and perception of breathy vowels. Speech Communication Group Working Papers 1. Cambridge, MA: Research Laboratory of Electronics.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul. 2001. Praat: A system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International 59 (10), 341–345.Google Scholar
Bradley, David. 1982. Register in Burmese. In Bradley, David (ed.), Papers in Southeast Asian Linguistics 8: Tonation 8, pp. 117–132. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, The Australian National University.Google Scholar
Cvrček, Václav. 2010. Mluvnice současné češtiny I: jak se píše a jak se mluví [Grammar of modern Czech I: How one writes and how one speaks]. Praha: Univerzita Karlova. Nakladatelství Karolinum.Google Scholar
Dankovičová, Jana. 1997. Czech. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 27, 77–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Lisa. 2006. Comparing tongue shapes from ultrasound imaging using smoothing spline and analysis of variance. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 120, 407–415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denning, Keith. 1989. The diachronic development of phonological voice quality, with special reference to Dinka and the other Nilotic languages. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Dhananjaya, N. Gowda, Yegnanarayana, Bayya & Bhaskararao, Peri. 2012. Acoustic analysis of trill sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 131 (4), 3141–3152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dvořák, Věra. 2010. Voicing assimilation in Czech. InStaroverov, Peter, Altshuler, Daniel, Braver, Aaron, Fasola, Carlos & Murray, Sarah (eds.), Rutgers Working Papers in Linguistics 3, 115–144. New Brunswick, NJ: LGSA, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Fischer-Jørgensen, Eli. 1967. Phonetic analysis of breathy (murmured) vowels in Gujarati. Indian Linguistics 28, 71–139.Google Scholar
Gick, Bryan. 2002. The use of ultrasound for linguistic phonetic fieldwork. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 32, 113–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gick, Bryan, Bird, Sonya & Wilson, Ian. 2005. Techniques for field application of lingual ultrasound imaging. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 19 (6–7), 503–514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grepl, Miroslav & Hladká, Zdeňka. 1995. Příruční mluvnice Čestiny [Handbook grammar of Czech]. Praha: Lidové Noviny.Google Scholar
Gu, Chong. 2002. Smoothing spline ANOVA models. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hála, Bohuslav. 1923. K popisu pražské výslovnosti: studie z experimentální fonetiky [Towards a description of Prague pronunciation: Studies from experimental phonetics]. Praha: Nákl. České akademie věd a umění.Google Scholar
Henderson, Eugénie. 1952. The main features of Cambodian pronunciation. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 14 (1), 149–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, Eugénie. 1977. The larynx and language: A missing dimension? Phonetica 34, 256–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, Nathalie, Doval, Boris, d'Alessandro, Christophe & Castellengo, Michèle. 2000. Open quotient measurements on EGG, speech and singing signals. 4th International Workshop on Advances in Quantitative Laryngoscopy, Voice and Speech Research, Jena, 93–101.Google Scholar
Henriksen, Nicholas & Willis, Erik. 2010. Acoustic characterization of phonemic trill production in Jerezano Andalusian Spanish. InOrtega-Llebaria, Marta (ed.), 4th Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonology, 115–127. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Hillenbrand, James, Cleveland, Ronald & Erickson, Robert. 1994. Acoustic correlates of breathy vocal quality. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 37, 769–778.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holmberg, Eva, Hillman, Robert, Perkell, Joseph, Guiod, Peter & Goldman, Susan. 1995. Comparisons among aerodynamic electroglottographic, and acoustic spectral measures of female voice. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 38, 1212–1223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hombert, Jean-Marie. 1978. Consonant types, vowel quality, and tone. In Fromkin, Victoria A. (ed.), Tone: A linguistic survey, 77–111. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huffman, Marie. 1987. Measures of phonation type in Hmong. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 81, 495–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iskarous, Khalil & Kavitskaya, Darya. 2010. The interaction between contrast, prosody, and coarticulation in structuring phonetic variability. Journal of Phonetics 38, 625–639.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kadenge, Maxwell & Mudzingwa, Calisto. 2012. Comparing Shona loanwords of monolingual and bilingual speakers: An optimality theory analysis. South African Journal of African Languages 32 (2), 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, Patricia, Esposito, Christina, Garellek, Marc, Khan, Sameerud Dowla & Kuang, Jianging. 2010. Phonation contrasts across languages. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 108, 188–202.Google Scholar
Kelsey, Charles, Woodhouse, Robert & Minifie, Fred. 1969. Ultrasound observations of coarticulation in the pharynx. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 46 (4), 1016–1018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ketner, Katherine. 2005. The phonology of Czech [ř]. Ms., University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Klatt, Dennis & Klatt, Laura. 1990. Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice quality variations among female and male talkers. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 87, 820–857.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ladefoged, Peter. 1983. The linguistic use of different phonation types. In Bless, Diane M. & Abbs, James H. (eds.), Vocal fold physiology: Contemporary research and clinical issues, 351–360. San Diego, CA: College Hill.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Maddieson, Ian. 1996. The sounds of the world's languages. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Li, Min, Kambhamettu, Chandra & Stone, Maureen. 2003. Snake for band edge extraction and its applications. 6th IASTED International Conference on Computers, Graphics, and Imaging, Honolulu, 212–217.Google Scholar
Li, Min, Kambhamettu, Chandra & Stone, Maureen. 2005. Automatic contour tracking in ultrasound images. International Journal of Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 19 (6/7), 545–554.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacKay, Ian. 1977. Tenseness in vowels: An ultrasonic study. Phonetica 34, 325–351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGowan, Richard. 1992. Tongue-tip trills and vocal-tract wall compliance. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 91, 2903–2910.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Proctor, Michael. 2009. Gestural characterization of a phonological class: The liquids. Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University.Google Scholar
Short, David. 1987. Czech and Slovak. In Comrie, Bernard (ed.), The world's major languages, 367–390. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skaličková, Alena. 1974. Srovnávací fonetika angličtiny a češtiny [Comparative phonetics of English and Czech]. Praha: Academia.Google Scholar
Skarnitzl, Radek. 2011. Znělostní kontrast nejen v češtině [Voicing contrasts not only in Czech]. Praha: Nakladatelství Epocha.Google Scholar
Solé, Maria-Josep. 2002a. Assimilatory processes and aerodynamic factors. InGussenhoven, Carlos & Warner, Natasha (eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology, 351–386. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solé, Maria-Josep. 2002b. Aerodynamic characteristics of trills and phonological patterning. Journal of Phonetics 30, 655–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonies, Barbara, Shawker, Thomas, Hall, Thomas, Gerber, Lynn & Leighton, Stephen. 1981. Ultrasonic visualization of tongue motion during speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 70, 683–686.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stone, Maureen, Faber, Alice, Raphael, Lawrence & Shawker, Thomas. 1992. Cross-sectional tongue shape and linguopalatal contact patterns in [s], [ʃ], and [l]. Journal of Phonetics 20, 253–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Maureen, Morish, Kathleen, Sonies, Barbara & Shawker, Thomas. 1987. Tongue curvature: A model of shape during vowel production. Folia Phoniatrica 39, 302–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Maureen, Shawker, Thomas, Talbot, Thomas & Rich, Alan. 1988. Cross-sectional tongue shape during vowel production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 83, 1586–1596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tehrani, Henry. 2011. EGG works (v. 11.07.13). NSF Voice Project.Google Scholar
Vachek, Josef. 1963. The place of the sound [ř] in the structures of Slavonic languages. Sborník Prací Filosofické Fakulty Brněnské Univerzity A 11, 81–91.Google Scholar
Volín, Jan. 2010. Fonetika a fonologie. In Václav Cvrček a kolektiv, Mluvnice současné češtiny [Grammar of modern Czech], 35–64. Praha: Karolinum.Google Scholar
Walsh-Dickey, Laura. 1997. The phonology of liquids. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst.Google Scholar
Willis, Erik. 2006. Trill variation in Dominican Spanish: An acoustic examination and comparative analysis. InSagarra, Nuria & Toribio, Almeida Jacqueline (eds.), Selected proceedings of the 9th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, 121–131. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Willis, Erik & Bradley, Travis. 2008. Contrast maintenance of taps and trills in Dominican Spanish: Data and analysis. InColantoni, Laura & Steele, Jeffery (eds.), Selected proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonology, 87–100. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar