Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T12:22:30.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of verbal labeling on memory for hand movements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2004

KATHERINE A.R. FRENCHAM
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia
ALLISON M. FOX
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia Private Practice
MURRAY T. MAYBERY
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia

Abstract

This study examined whether a secondary verbal shadowing task influences recall for hand movements. Descriptive verbal labels associated with hand postures (e.g., “fist”, “palm”) were presented auditorily, concurrent with video presentation of hand postures, and the participant was instructed to shadow the words aloud. In the congruent verbal labels condition, the words were matched with the hand postures shown, and in the incongruent condition, the labels and hand postures were unmatched. In Experiment 1 (N = 18), a computerized version of the Kaufman Hand Movements Test (KHMT), which involves three distinct hand postures, was performed under congruent and incongruent labels conditions, and baseline. For Experiment 2 (N = 18), the same format was applied to a hand movement span task, similar to the KHMT, but based on seven distinct hand postures. For both experiments, shadowing congruent labels enhanced serial recall, whereas shadowing incongruent labels reduced recall when compared to baseline. Thus memory for hand movements was affected by the content of the secondary verbal task, consistent with participants spontaneously using a verbal recoding and rehearsal strategy to support this form of memory, a strategy enhanced through the provision of appropriate labels. (JINS, 2004, 10, 355–361.)

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2004 The International Neuropsychological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Banich, M.T. (1997). Neuropsychology: The neural bases of mental function. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Barry, P. & Riley, J. (1987). Adult norms for the Kaufman Hand Movements Test and a single-subject design for acute brain injury rehabilitation. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 9, 449455.Google Scholar
Buchner, A., Irmen, L., & Erdfelder, E. (1996). On the irrelevance of semantic information for the “irrelevant speech” effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 765779.Google Scholar
Chuah, Y.M.L. & Maybery, M.T. (1999). Verbal and spatial short-term memory: Common sources of developmental change? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 73, 744.Google Scholar
Feyereisen, P. & Van der Linden, M. (1997). Immediate memory for different kinds of gestures in younger and older adults. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 16, 519533.Google Scholar
Fox, G. & Fox, A.M. (2001). The effects of brain damage on the performance of hand movement sequences. Brain Injury, 2, 140144.Google Scholar
Fox, G.A., Fox, A.M., & Davenport, T. (1993). Neuropsychological assessment of mild head injury. Paper presented at the 17th Annual Brain Impairment Conference, Canberra Australia.
Frencham, K., Fox, A., & Maybery, M. (2003). The Hand Movement Test as a tool in neuropsychological assessment: Interpretation within a working memory theoretical framework. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 9, 633641.Google Scholar
Hamilton, H. & Holzman, T.G. (1989). Linguistic encoding in short-term memory as a function of stimulus type. Memory and Cognition, 17, 541550.Google Scholar
Helstrup, T. (1996). Recall of spatial movement patterns as a function of context and encoding. Psychologische Beitrage, 38, 393403.Google Scholar
Helstrup, T. (1999). Visuo-spatial encoding of movement patterns. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 11, 357371.Google Scholar
Helstrup, T. (2000). The effect of strategies and contexts on memory for movement patterns. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41, 209215.Google Scholar
Jones, D. (1999). The cognitive psychology of auditory distraction: The 1997 BPS Broadbent lecture. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 167187.Google Scholar
Kaufman, A. & Kaufman, N. (1983). Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children. Circle Pines, Minnesota: American Guidance Service.
Klauer, K. & Stegmaier, R. (1997). Interference in immediate spatial memory: Shifts of spatial attention or central-executive involvement? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 7999.Google Scholar
Orwig, G.W. (1979). Effects of verbal shadowing on the recognition of visually presented verbal and nonverbal information. Education Communication and Technology, 27, 2530.Google Scholar
Quinn, J.G. & Ralston, G.E. (1986). Movement and attention in working memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38A, 689703.Google Scholar
Remoundou, M. & Humphreys, G. (2001). Memory span for pantomimed movements. Paper presented at the 3rd International Conference on Memory, Valencia, Spain.
Richardson, J. & Barry, C. (1985). The effects of minor closed head injury upon human memory: Further evidence on the role of mental imagery. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 149168.Google Scholar
Smyth, M.M. & Pendleton, L. (1989). Working memory for movements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 235250.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1987). Wechsler Memory Scale–Revised manual. New York: The Psychological Corporation.
Woodin, M.E. & Heil, J. (1996). Skilled motor performance and working memory in rowers: Body patterns and spatial positions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 357378.Google Scholar