Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T11:52:30.090Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Direct and indirect effects of demographic, medical, and psychological variables on neuropsychological performance in normal geriatric persons: A structural equation model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2009

Craig Lyons Uchiyama ,
Maura Mitrushina ,
Paul Satz  and
Matthew Schall
Craig Lyons Uchiyama
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles, School of Medicine, Neuropsychiatric Institute and Hospital, Los Angeles, California 90024
Maura Mitrushina
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles, School of Medicine, Neuropsychiatric Institute and Hospital, Los Angeles, California 90024 California State University, Northridge, California 91330
Paul Satz
Affiliation:
California State University, Northridge, California 91330
Matthew Schall
Affiliation:
Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana 70118
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The direct and indirect effects of demographic, medical, and psychological variables on neuropsychological performance in elderly individuals were examined using a LISREL structural equation model. One-hundred fifty-six geriatric subjects were individually administered a comprehensive neuropsychological battery, an extensive medical history and demographics questionnaire, and the Neuropsychology Behavior and Affect Profile (a psychological assessment instrument). The model assessed the effects of five independent latent variables (medical history, psychological functioning, global mental status, education, and gender-related functioning) on two dependent latent variables (nonverbal and verbal neuropsychological functioning). The best fitting model revealed that three latent variables (medical history, global mental status, and gender-related functioning) had direct effects on neuropsychological functioning and that all five independent variables exhibited indirect effects. These findings suggest that the influence of demographic variables on neuropsychological functioning for geriatric persons is complex and that certain variables should not be interpreted independently of each other due to their significant moderating influences. (JINS, 1996, 2, 299–305.)

Keywords

NeuropsychologyGeriatricModerating variables
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 2 , Issue 4 , July 1996 , pp. 299 - 305
Copyright
Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Albert, M.S. (1981). Geriatric neuropsychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 835–850.Google Scholar
Albert, M.S. & Heaton, R.K. (1988). Intelligence testing. In Albert, M.S., & Moss, M.B. (Eds.), Geriatric neuropsychology (pp. 13–32). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Benbow, C.P. & Stanley, J.C. (1980). Sex differences in mathematical ability: Fact or artifact? Science, 210, 1262–1264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benton, A.L., Eslinger, P.J., & Damasio, A.R. (1981). Normative observations on neuropsychological test performances in old age. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 3, 33–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boone, K.B., Miller, B.L., Lesser, I.M., Hill, E., & D'Elia, L. (1990). Performance on frontal lobe tests in healthy, older individuals. Developmental Neuropsychology, 6, 215–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, M.W. (1987). Robustness of statistical inference in factor analysis and related models. Biometrika, 74, 375–384.Google Scholar
Earnst, P.E., Heaton, R.K., Wilkinson, W.E., & Manke, W.F. (1979). Cortical atrophy, ventricular enlargement and intellectual impairment in the aged. Neurology, 29, 1138–1143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eidelberg, D. & Galaburda, A.M. (1982). Symmetry and asymmetry in the human posterior thalamus. Archives of Neurology, 39, 235–332.Google Scholar
Furry, C.A. & Baltes, P.B. (1973). The effect of age differences in ability-extraneous performance variables on the assessment of intelligence in children, adults, and the elderly. Journal of Gerontology, 28, 73–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geschwind, N. & Levitsky, W. (1968). Left-right asymmetries in the temporal speech region. Science, 161, 186–187.Google Scholar
Haaland, K.Y., Vranes, L.F., Goodwin, J.S., & Garry, P.J. (1987). Wisconsin Card Sort Test performance in healthy elderly population. Journal of Gerontology, 42, 345–346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harshman, R.A., Hampson, E., & Berenbaum, S.A. (1983). Individual differences in cognitive abilities and brain organization, part I: Sex and handedness. Differences in ability. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 37, 144–192.Google Scholar
Heaton, R.K., Grant, I., & Matthews, C.G. (1986). Differences in neuropsychological test performance associated with age, education, and sex. In Grant, I. & Adams, K. (Eds.), Neuropsychological assessment of neuropsychiatric disorders (pp. 100–120). New York: Oxford Press.Google Scholar
Hecaen, H. & Sauguet, J. (1971). Cerebral dominance in left-handed subjects. Cortex, 7, 19–48.Google Scholar
Joreskog, K.B. & Sorbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications (2nd cd.). Chicago: SPSS, Inc.Google Scholar
Kimura, D. (1987). Are men's and women's brains really different? Canadian Psychology, 28, 133–147.Google Scholar
Kolb, B. & Whishaw, I.Q. (1990). Fundamentals of human neuropsychology. New York: W.H. Freeman & Company.Google Scholar
LaRue, A. & Jarvik, L.F. (1982). Old age and biobehavioral changes. In Wolman, B.B., Stricker, G., Ellman, S.J., Keith-Spiegel, P., & Palermo, D.S. (Eds.), Handbook of developmental psychology (pp. 791–866). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Nelson, L., Satz, P., & D'Elia, L.F. (1994). Neuropsychology behavior and affect profile self and other versions manual. Palo Alto, CA: Mind Garden Press.Google Scholar
Reed, T., Carmelli, D., Swan, G.E., Breitner, J.C.S., Welsh, K.A., Jarvik, G.P., Deeb, S., & Auwerx, J. (1994). Lower cognitive performance in normal older adult male twins carrying the apolipoprotein E ***4 allele. Archives of Neurology, 51, 1189–1192.Google Scholar
Swan, G.E., Carmelli, D., & LaRue, A. (1995). Performance on the Digit Symbol Substitution Test and 5-year mortality in the Western Collaborative Group Study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 141, 32–40.Google Scholar
Swan, G.E., LaRue, A., Carmelli, D., Reed, T.E., Fabsitz, R.R. (1992). Decline in cognitive performance in aging twins: Heritability and biobehavioral predictors from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Twin Study. Archives of Neurology, 49, 476–481.Google Scholar
Uchiyama, C.L., Mitrushina, M.N., D'Elia, L.F., Satz, P., & Mathews, A. (1994). Frontal lobe functioning in geriatric and non-geriatric samples: An argument for multimodal analyses. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 9, 215–227.Google Scholar
Veroff, A.E. (1980). The neuropsychology of aging: Qualitative analysis of visual reproductions. Psychological Research, 41, 259–268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willis, L., Yeo, R.A., Thomas, P., & Garry, P.J. (1988). Differential declines in cognitive function with aging: The possible role of health status. Developmental Neuropsychology, 4, 23–28.Google Scholar