Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T05:14:57.722Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

89 The Neuropsychology of Complex Homelessness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2023

Jamie Berry*
Affiliation:
Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Advanced Neuropsychological Treatment Services, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Arthur Shores
Affiliation:
Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Advanced Neuropsychological Treatment Services, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Karen Wallace
Affiliation:
Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Advanced Neuropsychological Treatment Services, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Peter Valpiani
Affiliation:
The Haymarket Foundation, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Grace Rullis
Affiliation:
The Haymarket Foundation, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Nicola Earls
Affiliation:
Advanced Neuropsychological Treatment Services, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Talia Nardo
Affiliation:
Advanced Neuropsychological Treatment Services, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
*
Correspondence: Jamie Berry, Macquarie University/Advanced Neuropsychological Treatment Services, jamie.berry@mq.edu.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

Although the cognitive profiles of people experiencing homelessness have been described in the literature, the neuropsychological profile of people experiencing complex homelessness has not been delineated. Complex homelessness is homelessness that continues despite the provision of bricks and mortar solutions. People experiencing complex homelessness often have an array of physical health, mental health, substance use, neurodevelopmental and neurocognitive disorders. The present study aimed to delineate the neuropsychological profile of people experiencing complex homelessness and explore the utility of neuropsychological assessment in supporting this population.

Participants and Methods:

19 people experiencing complex homelessness in Sydney, Australia, were consecutively referred by specialist homelessness services for neuropsychological assessment. They underwent comprehensive assessment of intelligence, memory and executive functioning and completed questionnaires to screen for the presence of ADHD, PTSD, depression, anxiety and stress. A range of performance validity measures were included. Referrers were asked to complete questionnaires on history of childhood trauma, psychological functioning, drug and alcohol use, functional cognitive abilities, homelessness factors, personality, risk of cognitive impairment and adaptive functioning and to note existing or suspected mental health, neurodevelopmental and neurocognitive disorders. Referrers also completed a post-assessment pathways questionnaires to identify whether the neuropsychological assessment facilitated referral pathways (e.g., for government housing or financial assistance). Clinicians completed a post-assessment diagnosis survey, which was compared to the pre-assessment known or suspected diagnoses. Finally, referrers were asked to complete a satisfaction questionnaire regarding the neuropsychological assessment.

Results:

Mean (SD) WAIS-IV indexes were VCI = 81.1 (14.5), PRI = 86.1 (10.9), WMI = 80.5 (13.0), PSI = 81.6 (10.2). Mean WMS-IV Flexible (LMVR) indexes were AMI = 68.3 (19.6), VMI = 77.1 (19.3), IMI = 72.7 (17.2), and DMI = 70.5 (17.6). The majority of participants showed unusual differences between WAIS-IV and TOPF-predicted WAIS-IV scores and between WAIS-IV General Ability and WMS-IV Flexible (LMVR) scores. Demographically corrected scores on tests of executive functioning were mostly one or more standard deviations below the mean. The majority of participants screened positive on screening measures of executive dysfunction, PTSD and ADHD and had elevated self-reported psychological distress scores. At least one new diagnosis was made for nine (47%) participants, established diagnoses were confirmed for two (11%) participants, diagnoses were supported for 15 (79%) participants, tentative diagnoses were made for 16 (84%) participants, and five (26%) participants had at least one diagnosis disconfirmed/unsupported. Referrers indicated that the majority of post-assessment pathways were more accessible following the neuropsychological assessment and that they were very satisfied with the neuropsychological assessments overall.

Conclusions:

This is one of the first studies to delineate the neuropsychological profile of people experiencing complex homelessness using robust psychometric approaches, including performance validity tests. This population experiences a high burden of cognitive impairment and associated substance use, neurodevelopmental and mental health comorbidities. Neuropsychological assessment makes referral pathways more accessible and is valued by referrers of people experiencing complex homelessness.

Type
Poster Session 01: Medical | Neurological Disorders | Neuropsychiatry | Psychopharmacology
Copyright
Copyright © INS. Published by Cambridge University Press, 2023