Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ph5wq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T13:22:01.431Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

GEOMETRICAL AND MEASURE-THEORETIC STRUCTURES OF MAPS WITH A MOSTLY EXPANDING CENTER

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 July 2021

Jiagang Yang*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Geometria, Instituto de Matemática e Estatística, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, Brazil (yangjg@impa.br)

Abstract

In this article we study physical measures for $\operatorname {C}^{1+\alpha }$ partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms with a mostly expanding center. We show that every diffeomorphism with a mostly expanding center direction exhibits a geometrical-combinatorial structure, which we call skeleton, that determines the number, basins and supports of the physical measures. Furthermore, the skeleton allows us to describe how physical measures bifurcate as the diffeomorphism changes under $C^1$ topology.

Moreover, for each diffeomorphism with a mostly expanding center, there exists a $C^1$ neighbourhood, such that diffeomorphism among a $C^1$ residual subset of this neighbourhood admits finitely many physical measures, whose basins have full volume.

We also show that the physical measures for diffeomorphisms with a mostly expanding center satisfy exponential decay of correlation for any Hölder observes. In particular, we prove that every $C^2$ , partially hyperbolic, accessible diffeomorphism with 1-dimensional center and nonvanishing center exponent has exponential decay of correlations for Hölder functions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alves, J. F., Bonatti, C. and Viana, M., SRB measures for partially hyperbolic systems whose central direction is mostly expanding, Invent. Math. 140 (2000), 351398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alves, J. F. and Li, X., Gibbs-Markov-Young structures with (stretched) exponential tail for partially hyperbolic attractors, Adv. Math. 279 (2017), 405437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, M. and Vásquez, C. H., On mostly expanding diffeomorphisms, Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 38 (2018), 28382859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, M. and Vásquez, C. H., Statistical stability of mostly expanding diffeomorphisms, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar Anal. Non Linaire 37(6) (2020), 12451270.Google Scholar
Avila, A., On the regularization of conservative maps, Acta Math. 205 (2010), 518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baraviera, A. and Bonatti, C., Removing zero central Lyapunov exponents, Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 23 (2003), 1655–1670.Google Scholar
Barreira, L., Pesin, Ya. and Schmeling, J., Dimension and product structure of hyperbolic measures, Ann. Math. 149 (1999), 755783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonatti, C. and Crovisier, S., Recurrence et genericite, Invent. Math. 158 (2004), 33104.Google Scholar
Bonatti, C., Díaz, L. J. and Ures, R., Minimality of strong stable and unstable foliations for partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms, J. Inst. Math. Jussieu 1 (2002), 513541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonatti, C., Díaz, L. J. and Viana, M., Dynamics Beyond Uniform Hyperbolicity, Encyclopaedia Math. Sci, Vol. 102 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2005).Google Scholar
Bonatti, C. and Viana, M., SRB measures for partially hyperbolic systems whose central direction is mostly contracting, Israel J. Math. 115 (2000), 157C193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, R., Entropy for group endomorphisms and homogeneous spaces, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 153 (1971), 401414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brin, M., Burago, D. and Ivanov, S., Dynamical coherence of partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms of the 3-torus, J. Mod. Dyn. 3 (2009) 111.Google Scholar
Brin, M. and Pesin, Ya., Partially hyperbolic dynamical systems, Izv. Acad. Nauk. SSSR 1 (1974), 177212.Google Scholar
Brown, A., Smoothness of stable holonomies inside center-stable manifolds and the ${C}^2$ hypothesis in Pugh-Shub and Ledrappier-Young theory, Preprint 2016, https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.05886.Google Scholar
Burns, K., Dolgopyat, D., Pesin, Ya. and Pollicott, M., Stable ergodicity for partially hyperbolic attractors with negative central exponents, J. Mod. Dyn. 2 (2008), 6381.Google Scholar
Burns, K., Rodriguez Hertz, F., Rodriguez Hertz, M. A., Talitskaya, A. and Ures, R., Density of accessibility for partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms with one-dimensional center, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 22 (2008), 7588.Google Scholar
Burns, K. and Wilkinson, A., On the ergodicity of partially hyperbolic systems, Ann. Math. 171 (2010), 451489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzzi, J., Crovisier, S. and Sarig, O., Measures of maximal entropy for surface diffeomorphisms, Preprint 2018, https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.02240.Google Scholar
Cao, Y., Liao, G. and You, Z., Upper bounds on measure theoretic tail entropy for dominated splittings, Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 40(9) (2020), 23052316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catsigeras, E., Cerminara, M. and Enrich Pesin, H., Entropy formula for ${C}^1$ diffeomorphisms with dominated splitting, Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 35(3) (2015), 737761 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chernov, N. and Haskell, C., Nonuniformly hyperbolic K-systems are Bernoulli, Ergod. Th & Dynam. Sys. 16(1) (1996), 1944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crovisier, S., Yang, D.and Zhang, J., Empirical measures of partially hyperbolic attractors, Commun. Math. Phys. 375(1) (2020), 725764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolgopyat, D., Limit theorems for partially hyperbolic systems, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 356(4) (2004), 16371689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolgopyat, D., On differentiability of SRB states for partially hyperbolic systems, Invent. Math. 155 (2004), 389449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolgopyat, D., Viana, M. and Yang, J., Geometric and measure-theoretical structures of maps with mostly contracting center, Commun. Math. Phys. 341 (2016), 9911014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gan, S., A generalized shadowing lemma, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 8(3) (2002), 627632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouëzel, S., Decay of correlations for nonuniformly expanding systems, Bull. Soc. Math. France 134(1) (2006), 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammerlindl, A. and Potrie, R., Pointwise partial hyperbolicity in three-dimensional nilmanifolds, J. Lond. Math. Soc. 89 (2014), 853875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez Hertz, F., Rodriguez Hertz, M. A., Tahzibi, A. and Ures, R., New criteria for ergodicity and nonuniform hyperbolicity, Duke Math. J. 160 (2011), 599629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, M., Pugh, C. and Shub, M., Invariant Manifolds, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 583 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hua, Y., Yang, F. and Yang, J., New criterion of physical measures for partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 373(1) (2020), 385417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledrappier, F., Propriétés ergodiques des mesures de Sinaï, Publ. Math. I.H.E.S. 59 (1984) 163188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledrappier, F. and Strelcyn, J. M., A proof of the estimation from below in Pesins entropy formula, Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 2 (1982), 203219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledrappier, F. and Young, L.-S., The metric entropy of diffeomorphisms. I. Characterization of measures satisfying Pesin’s entropy formula, Ann. Math. 122 (1985), 509539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledrappier, F. and Young, L.-S., The metric entropy of diffeomorphisms. II. Relations between entropy, exponents and dimension, Ann. Math. 122 (1985), 540574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liao, G., Viana, M. and Yang, J., The entropy conjecture for diffeomorphisms away from tangencies, J. Eur. Math. Soc. 15(6) (2013), 20432060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liao, S. T., On $\left(\eta, d\right)$ -contractible orbits of vector fields, Sys. Sci. Math. Sci. 2 (1989), 193227.Google Scholar
Mañé, R., Contributions to the stability conjecture, Topology 17 (1978), 383396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niţică, V. and Török, A., An open dense set of stably ergodic diffeomorphisms in a neighborhood of a non-ergodic one, Topology 40 (2001), 259278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ornstein, D. and Weiss, B., On the Bernoulli nature of systems with some hyperbolic structure, Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 18 (1998), 441456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pesin, Ya., Characteristic Ljapunov exponents, and smooth ergodic theory, Uspehi Mat. Nauk 32(4) (1977), 55–112, 287 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Pesin, Ya. and Sinai, Ya., Gibbs measures for partially hyperbolic attractors, Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 2 (1982), 417438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pugh, C. and Shub, M., Ergodicity of Anosov actions, Invent. Math. 15 (1972), 1C–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rokhlin, V. A., On the fundamental ideas of measure theory, Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. 10 (1952), 1–52; Translation from Mat. Sbornik 25 (1949) 107150.Google Scholar
Rokhlin, V. A., Lectures on the entropy theory of measure-preserving transformations, Russ. Math. Surveys 22(5) (1967), 152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shi, Y., Viana, M. and Yang, J., Derived from Anosov diffeomorphisms with high entropy: Mañé’s example revisited.Google Scholar
Ures, R., Intrinsic ergodicity of partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms with a hyperbolic linear part, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 140 (2012), 19731985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ures, R., Viana, M. and Yang, J., Nonuniform expansion bundles, Preprint.Google Scholar
Viana, M. and Yang, J., Physical measures and absolute continuity for one-dimensional center direction, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 30 (2013), 845877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, X., Wang, L. and Zhu, Y., Formula of entropy along unstable foliations for ${C}^1$ diffeomorphisms with dominated splitting, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 38 (2018), 21252140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, J., Entropy along expanding foliations, Preprint 2016, https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.05504.Google Scholar
Young, L.-S., Statistical properties of dynamical systems with some hyperbolicity, Ann. Math. 147 (1998), 585650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, L.-S., Recurrence times and rates of mixing, Israel J. Math. 110 (1999), 153188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, L.-S., What are SRB measures, and which dynamical systems have them?, J. Stat. Phys. 108 (2002), 733754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar