Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T05:37:46.403Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Two Notes on Questions of Office-Practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

Ralph Todhunter
Affiliation:
University Life Assurance Society

Extract

In this note 1 submit for discussion two questions in connection with limited-payment policies: (1) by what method should the office premiums be calculated, and (2) how should the policies be valued. Neither of these questions appears to have been brought—except incidentally—before the Institute; both are of some practical importance in view of the large amount of limited-payment business transacted in the United Kingdom; and in regard to both there seem to be greater differences in practice than would be justified by theory. The following remarks refer more particularly to participating policies of the kind issued by the majority of British companies—that is to say, policies entitled throughout their currency to the same reversionary bonuses as similar ordinary whole-life policies—but similar considerations would apply to non-participating policies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 1915

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 263 note * The corresponding expression for the requisite extra reserve (in addition to has been deduced in a rather more general form by Mr. A. Fraser in his Note on “The Special Reserve required for Future Profits on Limited Payment Policies” (T.F.A., vol. vi, p. 93), to which reference should be made. The writer is indebted to Mr. Fraser for the information that in a fairly large limited-payment class of some years' standing the total reserve by the usual method was almost exactly double the true reserve, and that in that class the mortality was found to be 61 per-cent of the O[M] as compared with 74 per-cent in the whole-life class and 52 per-cent in the Endowment Assurance class—all three classes being with profits.