Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T11:18:33.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Addendum to ‘The improving accuracy of the basic data and the exposed-to-risk of the English life tables’ (JIA 109, 117)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2012

Extract

In the above note I suggested that the improved accuracy of E.L.T. No. 13 as compared with E.L.T. No. 12 was largely because E.L.T. No. 13 was based on census and death registrations at which the date of birth had been asked for instead of age. Since writing that note I have come across interesting evidence that more accurate results are obtained when date of birth is asked for at a census than when age is required.

Type
Addendum
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gray, P. & Gee, F. A. (1972) A Quality Check on the 1966 Ten Per Cent Sample Census of England and Wales. (Office of Population Censuses and Surveys.) H.M.S.O., London.Google Scholar
Thatcher, A. R. (1981) Centenarians. Population Trends 25, 1114. H.M.S.O., London.Google Scholar