Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T01:13:00.948Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Conditions which give rise to Surplus in Life Assurance Companies, and on the Amount of the Return or “Bonus” which such Conditions justify

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

Charles Jellicoe*
Affiliation:
Eagle Insurance Company

Extract

To trace the succession of events which have given rise to the duplex system of assurance in this country, known as the Participating, and Non-participating, would not be altogether uninteresting or unprofitable. There is little doubt, that the immoderate premiums required at the outset by the few who were disposed to embark in the then novel speculation of life assurance, suggested the idea of mutual association, as a means of achieving the same objects on more advantageous terms; and thus the participating system owed, to a certain extent, its origin to the non-participating.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 1852

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 333 note * See Report on application of the “Equitable” for a charter, Vol. I., page 89.

page 334 note * px here denoting the premium for the risk; Φx, the difference between it and the premium charged; c and e, the claims and expenses respectively; and being f used as a symbol of summation merely.

page 334 note † There are, no doubt, others of an accidental description—such, for instance, as the abandonment of assurances by their owners; but although this was a matter of frequent occurrence formerly, it is no longer so at the present day; and it is very important to bear in mind, that it is only the value of the policy which in such cases fells into the general fund, not the amount of the premiums paid in respect of it, as the statements frequently put forth would seem to imply.

page 341 note * Take, for instance, the generally prevailing method of dividing the surplus in the proportion indicated by the difference between the amount of premiums paid at compound interest and the value of the assurance. Tha t is to say, in the proportion shewn by .p x-.l.

Since .l= ∫.px-∫.c, the former expression is equal to ∫.p x- (∫. px-∫.c)= ∫Φx+∫.c; so that the surplus is thus actually allotted amongst the assurances by this method, not simply in the proportion in which each has contributed thereto, but in the extraordinary ratio of its contribution to surplus, and to the payment of claims.