Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T20:58:29.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An exposé of the fallacy: ‘That it is just to tax temporary annuities at the same rate as perpetual annuities’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

Peter Hardy*
Affiliation:
Institute of Actuaries Corporation of the London Assurance

Extract

The merits and demerits of the present mode of assessing the Property and Income Tax have been so frequently made the subject of popular discussion, and are in themselves questions of such national importance, that I feel no apology to be necessary for again bringing the subject under the notice of the Institute of Actuaries.

A valuable paper on the inequitable operation of this tax was, some time ago, read before the Institute by Mr. Jellicoe; and, more recently, an elaborate and important contribution on the same subject was brought by Mr. Farr under the notice of the Statistical Society of London, which paper has given rise to a lengthened and very interesting discussion. An exceedingly temperate and able pamphlet has also been recently published by Mr. John G. Hubbard, the Deputy Governor of the Bank of England, in which that gentleman has discussed, with very considerable ability, the views of Mr. Warburton, and has, in my opinion, very effectually exposed their absurdity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 1852

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 199 note * We are all well aware that the long annuity is payable half-yearly, but it is unnecessary to complicate our argument by dealing with it, excepting as an annual payment.