Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T06:55:22.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rothbard and Mises on Interest: An Exercise in Theoretical Purity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Peter Lewin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The conventional wisdom in economics holds, with Irving Fisher, that interest is explained jointly by the forces of time preference (thrift) and productivity. One school of thought, however, has held stubbornly to the assertion that interest is best understood as a result of time preference alone, time preference as the essential determinant of interest. This is the pure time preference approach to interest. And while most economists are inclined to dismiss this approach out of hand, the pure time preference approach has proved remarkably resilient. Part of the explanation for the persistence of rival theories can be found, not surprisingly, in terminological confusions and ambiguities, for example in deciding among candidates for essential causation. I hope in this article to improve the case for the pure time preference approach to interest by clarifying the argument. It appears that some of the confusion can be attributed to the approach of two theorists, Ludwig von Mises and Murray Rothbard, and to their connecting the time preference approach to their particular a priori methodology.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , Spring 1997 , pp. 141 - 159
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Block, W. and Rockwell, L. H.. 1988. Man, Economy and Liberty: Essays in Honor of Murray N. Rothbard, Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn.Google Scholar
Böhm-Bawerk, E. von. 1884, 1889, 1921. Capital and Interest, Libertarian Press, South Holland, 1959.Google Scholar
Cowen, T. and Fink, R.. 1985. “Inconsistent Equilibrium Constructs: The Evenly Rotating Economy of Mises and Rothbard” American Economic Review, 75, no. 4, 866–89.Google Scholar
Faber, M. 1979. Introduction to Modern Austrian Capital Theory, Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
Faber, M. 1986. Studies in Austrian Capital Theory, Investment and Time, Springer-Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetter, F. A. 1977. Capital, Interest and Rent: Essays in the Theory of Distribution, edited by Rothbard, Murray N., Sheed, Andrews and McMeel, Kansas City.Google Scholar
Garrison, R. 1979a. “Comment: Waiting in Vienna” in Rizzo 1979, 215–26.Google Scholar
Garrison, R. 1979b. “In Defense of the Misesian Theory of Interest” Journal of Libertarian Studies, 3, no. 2, 141–50.Google Scholar
Garrison, R. 1988. “Professor Rothbard and the Theory of Interest,” in Block 1988, 44–55.Google Scholar
Greaves, P. L. and Greaves, B. B.. 1974. Mises Made Easier, 2d ed., Free Market Books New York, 1990.Google Scholar
Herbener, J. M., ed. 1993. The Meaning of Ludwig von Mises: Contributions in Economics, Sociology, Epistemology and Political Philosophy, Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn.Google Scholar
Kirzner, I. M. 1993. “The Pure Time-Preference Theory of Interest,” in Hebener, 1993, 166–92.Google Scholar
Lachmann, L. M. 1956. Capital and its Structure, Sheed, Andrews and McMeel, Kansas City, 1978.Google Scholar
Mises, L. von. 1940. Nationalökonomie, Editions Union, Geneva.Google Scholar
Mises, L. von. 1949. Human Action: A Treatise on Economics, 3d revised ed., Henry Regnery Company, Chicago, 1966.Google Scholar
Pellengahr, I. 1986a. “Austrians Versus Austrians I: A Subjectivist View of Interest,” in Faber 1986, 60–77.Google Scholar
Pellengahr, I. 1986b. “Austrians Versus Austrians II: Functionalist Versus Essentialist Theories of Interest,” in Faber 1986, 78–96.Google Scholar
Pellengahr, I. 1996. The Austrian Subjective Theory of Interest: An Investigation into the History of Thought, Peter Lang, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Rizzo, M. J. 1979. Time, Uncertainty and Equilibrium: Exploration of Austrian Themes, Health and Company, Lexington.Google Scholar
Rothbard, M. N. 1962. Man Economy and State: A Treatise on Economic Principles, Nash Publishing, Los Angeles, 1970.Google Scholar
Rothbard, M. N. 1963. America's Great Depression, 3d ed., Sheed and Ward, Kansas City, 1975.Google Scholar
Rothbard, M. N. 1977. “Introduction,” in Fetter 1977, 1–23.Google Scholar
Rothbard, M. N. 1987. “Time Preference” in John, Eatwell, Murray, Milgate and Peter, Newman, eds., The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, Macmillan, New York;Google Scholar
reprinted in Austrian Economics: A Reader, edited by Richard, Ebeling, Hillsdale College Press, Hillsdale, 1991.Google Scholar
Rothbard, M. N. 1995. An Austrian Perspective on the History of Economic Thought, 2 vols., Edward Elgar, Aldershot.Google Scholar
Yeager, L. B. 1979. “Capital Paradoxes and the Concept of Waiting” in Rizzo 1979, 187–214.Google Scholar