Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T22:43:19.566Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Romantic Political Economy: Donald Winch and David Levy on Victorian Literature and Economics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

A. M. C. Waterman
A. M. C. Waterman
Affiliation:
St John's College, Winnipeg R3T2M5, Canada.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Essay
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , March 2003 , pp. 91 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bagehot, Walter. 1965–1986. The Collected Works of Walter Bagehot, 15 vols., edited by Stevas, N. St John. London: The Economist.Google Scholar
Carlyle, Thomas. 1844. Past and Present, edited by Altick, Richard D.. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1965.Google Scholar
Carlyle, Thomas. 1849. “Occasional Discourses on the Negro Question.” Eraser's Magazine for Town and Country 40 (6): 670–79. Available at http://www.econlib.org.Google Scholar
Carlyle, Thomas. 1867. Shooting Niagara: And After? London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Collini, Stefan, Whatmore, Richard, and Young, Brian, eds. 2000a. History, Religion and Culture: British Intellectual History 1750–1950. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collini, Stefan, Whatmore, Richard, and Young, Brian, eds. 2000b. Economy, Polity and Society: British Intellectual History 1750–1950. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickens, Charles. 1854. Hard Times. In Complete Works, Centennial Edition. Geneva: Edito-Service, 1970.Google Scholar
Godwin, William. 1793. Enquiry Concerning Political Justice and its Influence on Morals and Happiness. London: Robinson.Google Scholar
Halévy, Elie. 1952. The Growth of Philosophic Radicalism, translated by Morris, M., new edition reprinted with corrections. London: Faber.Google Scholar
Leavis, F.R. 1950. “Introduction” to Mill on Bentham and Coleridge. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
Levy, David M. 1992. “Bishop Berkeley Exorcises the Infinite: Fuzzy Consequences of Strict Finitism.” Hume Studies 18 (2): 511–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, David M. 1995. “The Partial Spectator in the Wealth of Nations: A Robust Utilitarianism.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 2 (2): 299–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, David M. 1997. “Adam Smith's Rational Choice Linguistics.” Economic Inquiry 35 (3): 672–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, David M. 1999. “Katallactic Rationality: Language, Approbation, and Exchange.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 58 (4): 729–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, David M. 2001a. “Economic Texts as Apocrypha.” In Forget, Evelyn L. and Peart, Sandra, eds., Reflections on the Classical Canon in Economics: Essays in Honor of Samuel Hollander. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Levy, David M. 2001b. “How the Dismal Science Got Its Name: Debating Racial Quackery.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 23 (03): 5–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, David M. 2001c. How the Dismal Science Got Its Name: Classical Economics andthe Ur-Text of Racial Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovejoy, A. O. 1941. “The Meaning of Romanticism in the History of Ideas.” Journal of the History of Ideas 2 (2): 257–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1850. “The Negro Question.” Frasers's Magazine for Town and Country 41 (1): 25–31. Available at http://www.econlib.org.Google Scholar
Levy, David M. 1861. “Utilitarianism.” Fraser's Magazine for Town and Country 64 (4): 391–406.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. 1991. “Literary Imagination in Public Life.” New Literary History 22 (4): 877–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poliakov, Léon. 1974. The Aryan Myth, translated by Howard, Edmund. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, John D. 1985. Carlyle andthe Burden of History. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruskin, John. 1862. “Unto this Last:” Four Essays on the First Principles of Political Economy. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1887.Google Scholar
Ruskin, John. 1871. Munera Pulvis: Six Essays on the Elements of Political Economy. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1887.Google Scholar
Semmel, Bernard. 1962. The Governor Eyre Controversy. London: Macgibbon & Kee.Google Scholar
Southey, Robert. 1804. “Review of An Essay on the Principle of Population by T. R. Malthus.” Annual Review. Reprinted in Pyle, Andrew, ed., Population: Contemporary Responses to Thomas Malthus. Bristol: Thoemmes, 1994.Google Scholar
Southey, Robert. 1807. Letters from England by Dom Manuel Alvarez Espriella Translated from the Spanish. London.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P. 1963. The Making of the English Working Class. London: Gollancz.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P. 1976. William Morris: Romantic to Revolutionary. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Toynbee, Arnold. 1879. Lectures on the Industrial Revolution of the Eighteenth Century in England. Popular Addresses, Notes and Other Fragments, new edition. London: Longmans, Green, 1906.Google Scholar
Walvin, James. 1973. Black and White: The Negro and English Society, 1555–1945. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Waterman, A. M. C. 1991. Revolution, Economics and Religion: Christian Political Economy, 1798–1833. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterman, A. M. C. 1998. “Reappraisal of ‘Malthus the Economist’, 1933–97.” History of Political Economy 30 (2): 293–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterman, A. M. C. 2002. “The‘Sussex School’ and the History of Economic Thought: British Intellectual History, 1750–1950.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 9 (3): 452–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, N. P. 1927. The Idea ofthe Fall and of Original Sin (Bampton Lectures, 1924). London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond. 1958. Culture and Society, 1780–1950. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Winch, Donald. 1996. Riches and Poverty: An Intellectual History of Political Economy in Britain, 1750–1834. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Winch, Donald. 2000. “Mr Gradgrind and Jerusalem.” In Collini, Stefan, Whatmore, Richard and Young, Brian, Economy, Polity and Society: British Intellectual History 1750–1950. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Winch, Donald. 2001. “Ruskin and Political Economy.” Unpublished conference paper.Google Scholar
Winch, Donald. 2002. “Thinking Green, Nineteenth-Century Style: John Stuart Mill and John Ruskin.” In Bevir, Mark and Trentmann, Frank, eds., Markets in Context: Critical Thinkers and Social Movements from the Eighteenth Century to the Present. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William. 1950. Poetical Works, edited by Hutchinson, T., new edition prepared by E. de Selincourt. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar