Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T02:14:47.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reconstructing Allyn A. Young's Theory of Increasing Returns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Giorgio Colacchio
Giorgio Colacchio
Affiliation:
Department of Juridical Studies, University of Lecce, Italy. E-mail: giorgio.colacchio@ ateneo.unile.it.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In this essay we are going to closely analyze the importance of Allyn A. Young's theory of increasing returns. In truth, we could also discuss his position on economies of scale, in that the analytical definitions suggested by the theory, as we shall shortly see, are not that helpful in understanding exactly what this writer meant by (the principle of) increasing returns: in fact, the latter are always linked to the more general, all-pervasive concept of economic progress, as is evident from the title of his most famous work. Young's contribution to the debate (one only has to think of the cost controversy of the 1920s) over returns and economies (and diseconomies) of scale, was in truth somewhat marginal. His only work that dealt with these questions, besides his 1928 celebrated paper (Young 1928), dates back to 1913, when in an important critical note (Young 1913), which we shall briefly analyze in section 2, he criticized a number of economic policy rules deriving from Arthur C. Pigou's (1912) famous work. To put it more precisely, Young did not have any substantial role to play in the construction and perfection of the neoclassical theoretical paradigm; in fact, as we argue in section 3, there is significant evidence to suggest that he was probably moving increasingly further away from such a position. The essence of Young's work, summarized in the article written in 1928, would seem to consist in the request for a theoretical redirection, in the analysis of the dynamics of capitalist economies, along the lines of some of the classical economists, thus carrying the various suggestions on this matter already present in Alfred Marshall's theoretical contribution to extremes. In sections 4 and 5, dedicated to the discussion of this article and of its appendix respectively, we maintain that the logic of Young's analysis is based on a multi-sectoral model subject to qualitative and quantitative transformations, i.e., to structural change. Such a view enables us to understand: (1) the author's emphasis on the proportionality among different productive branches needed in order to ensure balanced economic expansion; (2) the attempt (made by the author in the appendix to his 1928 article) to explain the dynamics of the economic system in the presence of different intersectoral growth rates. In the concluding section we maintain that it is the alternative nature of his position compared with the “standard theory”—the reference here is particularly to Pigou's transcription of Marshall's economics—that represents the main feature of Young's work.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , September 2005 , pp. 321 - 344
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arrow, K. J. and Hahn, F. H. (1971) General Competitive Analysis (San Francisco, CA: Holden-Day Inc.).Google Scholar
Blitch, C. P. (1983a) Allyn A. Young: A Curious Case of Professional Neglect, History of Political Economy, 15 (1), pp. 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blitch, C. P. (1983b) Allyn Young on Increasing Returns, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 5 (3), pp. 359–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blitch, C. P. (1995) Allyn Young: The Peripatetic Economist (London: Macmillan and New York: St. Martin's Press, Inc.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bharadwaj, K. (1972) Marshall on Pigou's Wealth and Welfare, Economica, 39 (153), pp. 32–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. and Yoon, Y. J. (1999) Generalized Increasing Returns, Euler's Theorem, and Competitive Equilibrium, History of Political Economy, 31 (3), pp. 512–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. and Yoon, Y. J. (2000) A Smithean Perspective on Increasing Returns, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 22 (1), pp. 43–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlin, E. H. (1948) Proportionality, Divisibility and Economies of Scale, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 63 (02), pp. 229–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clapham, J. (1922) Of Empty Economic Boxes, in: Stigler, J. G. and Boulding, K. (Eds) Readings in Price Theory (London: Allen and Unwin, 1953).Google Scholar
Clark, J. B. (1899) The Distribution of Wealth (New York: Kelley & Millman, Inc., 1956).Google Scholar
Colacchio, G. and Soci, A. (2003) On the Aggregate Production Function and Its Presence in Modern Macroeconomics, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 14 (03), pp. 75–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, L. (1997) Implications of an Endogenous Theory of Growth in Allyn Young's Macroeconomic Concept of Increasing Returns, History of Political Economy, 29 (3), pp. 413–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debreu, G. (1959) Theory of Value (New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.).Google Scholar
Edgeworth, F. Y. (1894a). The Theory of International Values, I, The Economic Journal, IV (03), pp. 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgeworth, F. Y. (1894b) The Theory of International Values, II, The Economic Journal, IV (09), pp. 424–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgeworth, F. Y. (1894c) The Theory of International Values, III, The Economic Journal, IV (12), pp. 606–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgeworth, F. Y. (1911) The Laws of Increasing and Diminishing Returns, in: Edgeworth, F. Y. (Ed.), Papers Relating to Political Economy, Vol. 1 (New York: Burt Franklin, 1925), pp. 61–99.Google Scholar
Ely, R. T., Adams, T. A., Lorenz, M. O. and Young, A. A. (1908) Outlines of Economics, revised edition (New York: Macmillan).Google Scholar
Gold, B. (1981) Changing Perspectives on Size, Scale, and Returns: an Interpretative Survey, Journal of Economic Literature, 19 (03), pp. 5–33.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. R. (1985) Methods of Dynamic Economics (Oxford: Oxford Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Hicks, J. R. (1989) The Assumption of Constant Returns to Scale, in: Lawson, T., Palma, G. J. and Sender, J. (Eds) Kaldor's Political Economy (London: Academic Press Limited), pp. 9–17.Google Scholar
Increasing Returns and the Representative Firm: A Symposium (1930) The Economic Journal, XL (03), pp. 79–116.Google Scholar
Kaldor, N. (1934) The Equilibrium of the Firm, The Economic Journal, 65 (03), pp. 60–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaldor, N. (1972) The Irrelevance of Equilibrium Economics, The Economic Journal, 82 (12), pp. 1237–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, F. H. (1921) Risk, Uncertainty and Profit (Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Knight, F. H. (1925) On Decreasing Cost and Comparative Cost: A Rejoinder, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 39 (02), pp. 331–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laidler, D. (1993) Hawtrey, Harvard, and the Origins of the Chicago Tradition, Journal of Political Economy, 101 (12), pp. 1068–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundberg, E. (1937) Studies in the Theory of Economic Expansion (London: P.S. King & Sons).Google Scholar
Marchionatti, R. (1992) Marshall on Increasing Returns and Competition, Quaderni di Storia dell'Economia Politica, X/n. (1), pp. 553–81.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. (1879) The Pure Theory of Foreign Trade: The Pure Theory of Domestic Values (London: The London School of Economics, Replika Press, 1930).Google Scholar
Marshall, A. (1920) Principles of Economics, eighth edition (Hong Kong: Macmillan, 2000).Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1861) Theories of Surplus Value, Part. 2 (London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1969).Google Scholar
Mehrling, P. G. and Sandilands, R. J. (Eds) (1999) Money and Growth: Selected Papers of Allyn Abbot Young (New York: Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myrdal, G. (1931) Monetary Equilibrium (London: W. Hodge & Co., 1939).Google Scholar
Newman, P. (1987) Allyn Young, in: Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. and Newman, P. (Eds) The New Palgrave A Dictionary of Economics, Vol. 4 (London: Macmillan), pp. 937–40.Google Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L. (1981) Structural Change and Economic Growth: A Theoretical Essay on the Dynamics of the Wealth of Nations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L. (1993) Structural Economic Dynamics: A Theory of the Economic Consequences of Human Learning (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pigou, A. C. (1912) Wealth and Welfare (London: Macmillan and Company).Google Scholar
Pigou, A. C. (1932) The Economics of Welfare (London: Macmillan, 1952).Google Scholar
Richardson, G. B. (1976) Adam Smith on Competition and Increasing Returns, in: Skinner, A. S. and Wilson, T. (Eds) Essays on Adam Smith (Oxford: Clarendon Press), pp. 350–60.Google Scholar
Robertson, D. H. (1930) The Trees of the Forest, in: Increasing Returns and the Representative Firm: A Symposium, The Economic Journal, XL (03), pp. 79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandilands, R. J. (Ed.) (1990) Nicholas Kaldor's Notes on Allyn Young's LSE Lectures, 1927–1929, Journal of Economic Studies, 17 (3/4), pp 18–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. (1911) The Theory of Economic Development (New York: Oxford University Press, 1961).Google Scholar
Sraffa, P. (1925) On the Relation s Between Cost and Quantity Produced, in: Pasinetti, L. (Ed.) Italian Economic Papers, Vol. 3 (Bologna: Il Mulino, 1998).Google Scholar
Sraffa, P. (1926) The Laws of Returns under Competitive Conditions, The Economic Journal, XXXVI (12), pp. 535–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sraffa, P. (1930) A Criticism, in: Increasing Returns and the Representative Firm: A Symposium, The Economic Journal, XL (03), pp. 89–93.Google Scholar
Sraffa, P. (1960) Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Stigler, G. J. (1941) Production and Distribution Theories (New York: The Macmillan Company).Google Scholar
Viner, J. (1931) Cost Curves and Supply Curves, in: Stigler, G. J. and Boulding, K. H. (Eds) Readings in Price Theory (London: Allen and Unwin, 1953).Google Scholar
Whitaker, J. K. (Ed.) (1975) The Early Economic Writings of Alfred Marshall, 1867–1890, 2 vols. (London: Macmillan for the Royal Economic Society).Google Scholar
Young, A. A. (1908) The Social Dividend, Appendix to chapter XXV, “Profits” of Ely, Richard T., Adams, Thomas A., Lorenz, Max O., and Young, Allyn A, reprinted in: P. G. Mehrling and R. J. Sandilands (1999) Money and Growth: Selected Papers of Allyn Abbot Young (New York: Routledge), pp. 65–73.Google Scholar
Young, A. A. (1911) Some Limitations of the Value Concept, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 25 (05), pp. 409–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, A. A. (1913) Pigou's Wealth and Welfare, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 27 (08), pp. 672–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, A. A. (1917) Do the Statistics of the Concentration of Wealth in the United States Mean What They Are Commonly Assumed to Mean?, The American Economic Review, 7 Supplement (03), pp. 144–56.Google Scholar
Young, A. A. (1923) The Trend of Prices, The American Economic Review, 13 Supplement (03), pp. 5–14.Google Scholar
Young, A. A. (1927) Economic Problems New and Old (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company).Google Scholar
Young, A. A. (1928) Increasing Returns and Economic Progress, The Economic Journal XXXVIII (12), pp. 527–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, A. A. (1929). 11 entries in the Encyclopaedia Britannica, 14th edition: Capital, Economics, Labour, Land, Price, Rent, Supply and Demand, Utility, Value, Wages, Wealth. Reprinted in: Journal of Economic Studies, 17, 3/4: 115–160, 1990.Google Scholar