Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T21:21:49.296Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Marshall: Just how Interested in Doing Good was he?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Rhead S. Bowman
Rhead S. Bowman
Affiliation:
School of Business, Southern Utah University, 351 West Center St., Cedar City, UT 84720, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper critiques the way Alfred Marshall is presented in many histories of economic thought, in particular, the typical neglect of the relation of his economic theory and method to his public policy proposals and views on economic evolution. A good example is the textbook of Stanley L. Brue, The Evolution of Economic Thought, which is specifically policy oriented. He notes in his remarks on Marshall's life and method: “Marshall's thinking left room for cautious reform, that is, modest departures from laissez-faire” (2000, p. 295). But the only illustration of this is Marshall's discussion of the welfare effects of industry taxes and subsidies. However, even here Brue concludes (2000, p. 316) with a quote from Marshall: “These conclusions, it will be observed, do not by themselves afford a valid ground for government interference.”

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , December 2004 , pp. 493 - 518
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Albon, R. 1989. “Alfred Marshall and the Consumers' Loss from the British Post Office Monopoly.” History of Political Economy 21 (4): 679–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aslanbeigui, N. 1987. “Marshall's and Pigou's Policy Prescriptions on Unemployment, Socialism and Inequality.” In Walker, D. A., ed., Perspectives on the History of Economic Thought, Vol. I. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Blaug, M. 1997. Economic Theory in Retrospect, 5th edition. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, R. S. 1990. “Smith, Mill and Marshall on Human Capital Formation.” History of Political Economy 22 (2): 239–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, R. S. 1997. “The Place of Education in W. S. Jevons's Political Economy.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 4 (3): 455–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brue, S. L. 2000. The Evolution of Economic Thought, 6th edition. Orlando, FL: Dryden Press.Google Scholar
Canterbery, E. R. 1995. The Literate Economist. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Coats, A. W. 1990. “Marshall and Ethics.” In Tullberg, R. McWilliams, ed., Alfred Marshall in Retrospect. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Collard, D. A. 1990. Cambridge after Marshall.” In Whitaker, J. K., ed., Centenary Essays on Alfred Marshall. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Collini, S. 1991. Public Moralists: Political Thought and Intellectual Life in Britain 1850–1930. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekelund, R. B. Jr. & Hèbert, R. F. 1997. A History of Economic Theory and Method. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Groenewegen, P. 1990. “Marshall on Taxation.” In Tullberg, R. McWilliams, ed., Alfred Marshall in Retrospect. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Groenewegen, P. 1995. A Soaring Eagle: Alfred Marshall 1842–1924. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Hutchison, T. W. 1969. “Economists and Economic Policy in Britain After 1870.” History of Political Economy 1 (Fall): 231–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchison, T. W. 1978. On Revolutions and Progress in Economic Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jevons, W. S. 1905. The Principles of Economics. New York: Augustus M. Kelly, 1965.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. 1951. Essays In Biography. New York: W.W. Norton & Co, 1963.Google Scholar
Landreth, H. & Collander, D. C. 2002. History of Economics, 4th edition. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Levitt, T. 1976. “Alfred Marshall: Victorian Relevance for Modern Economics.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 90 (08): 425–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maloney, J. 1985. Marshall, Orthodoxy and the Professionalisation of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maloney, J. 1990. “Marshall and Business.” In Tullberg, Rita McWilliams, ed., Alfred Marshall in Retrospect. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. 1920. Principles of Economics, 8th edition. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. 1927. Industry and Trade. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. 1925. Memorials of Alfred Marshall, edited by Pigou, A. C.. New York: Augustus M. Kelly, 1966.Google Scholar
Marshall, M. P. & Marshall, A. 1881. The Economics of Industry. London.Google Scholar
Mathews, Robin C. O. 1990. “Marshall and the Labour Market.” In Whitaker, J. K., ed., Centenary Essays on Alfred Marshall. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McWilliams Tullberg, R. 1975. “Marshall's ‘Tendency to Socialism,’” History of Political Economy, 7 (1): 75–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Middleton, R. 1998. Charlatans or Saviours? Economists and the British economy from Marshall to Meade. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Reisman, D. 1986. The Economics of Alfred Marshall. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisman, D. 1990. Alfred Marshall's Mission. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, A. 1990. “Cambridge Economics in the Post-Marshallian Period.” In Tullberg, R. McWilliams, ed., Alfred Marshall in Retrospect. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Rogin, L. 1956. The Meaning and Validity of Economic Theory. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1776) An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. New York: Modern Library, 1937.Google Scholar
Spiegel, H. W. 1991. The Growth of Economic Thought. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Tullberg, R. M. 1990. Alfred Marshall in Retrospect. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Whitaker, J. K. 1977. “Some Neglected Aspects of Alfred Marshall's Economic and Social Thought.” History of Political Economy, 9 (2): 161–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitaker, J. K. 1987. “Alfred Marshall.” In Eatwell, J., Milgate, M., and Newman, P., eds, The New Palgrave: A Dictionary or Economics, Vol. 3. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Whitaker, J. K. 1990. “What Happened to the Second Volume of the Principles? The Thorny Path To Marshall's Last Books.” In Whitaker, J. K., ed., Centenary Essays on Alfred Marshall. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whitaker, J. K., ed., 1996. The Correspondence of Alfred Marshall, Economist, Vols. 1–3. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar