Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T10:56:42.358Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DEFINING EXCELLENCE: SEVENTY YEARS OF THE JOHN BATES CLARK MEDAL

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2020

Beatrice Cherrier  and
Andrej Svorenčík
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Before the John Bates Clark Medal (JBCM) had become a widely acknowledged professional and public marker of excellence in economics research, in the first twenty years since its inception more than seventy years ago in 1947, it was almost discontinued three times and once even not conferred. These controversies derived from the fact that the medal was originally established to showcase the expertise of economists to other scientists, policy-makers, and the wider public. While earlier awards were given to theorists, in later years empirical and policy-oriented economists gained ground, reflecting how such research became more prestigious in economics. Based on a quantitative analysis of the forty medalists so far, we show that this empirical shift was concomitant with a decrease in the diversity and an increase in concentration of laureates: twenty-four or twenty-five out of forty awardees received their PhD degree or worked at Harvard, MIT, or Chicago at the time of being awarded.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 42 , Issue 2 , June 2020 , pp. 153 - 176
Copyright
© The History of Economics Society 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Beatrice Cherrier, CNRS & THEMA, Cergy University, beatrice.cherrier@gmail.com. Andrej Svorenčík, University of Mannheim, Department of Economics, L7, 3-5, 68161 Mannheim, svorencik@uni-mannheim.de. The authors would like to thank the archivists of the Rubinstein Library, Duke University, and Erich Pinzon-Fuchs for their help with retrieving relevant archival materials. We also thank Pedro Duarte, Roger Backhouse, Steven Medema, David Warsh, participants of the session “Merit & Privilege in Economics” at the 2017 AEA meetings in Chicago, Marianne Betrand and John J. Siegfried in particular, as well as two anonymous referees for their very helpful comments and suggestions. Cherrier acknowledges financial support from INET for this research. The usual caveats apply.

References

REFERENCES

American Economic Review. 1945. “Report of the Exploratory Committee on Honors and Awards.” The American Economic Review 35 (2): 494–500.Google Scholar
American Economic Review. 1948. “Inauguration of the Francis A. Walker and John Bates Clark Awards.” The American Economic Review 38 (2): x–xiv.Google Scholar
American Economic Review. 1958. “Report of the President Presented at the Annual Business Meeting.” The American Economic Review 48 (2): 608–610.Google Scholar
Backhouse, Roger. 2017. Founder of Modern Economics: Paul A. Samuelson. Volume I. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Backhouse, Roger E., and Cherrier, Beatrice. 2017. “The Age of the Applied Economist: The Transformation of Economics since 1970.” Supplement, History of Polical Economy 49 (5): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barany, Michael J. 2014. “The Myth and the Medal.” Notices of the American Mathematical Society 62 (1): 15–20.Google Scholar
Bayer, Amanda, and Rouse, Cecilia Elena. 2016. “Diversity in the Economics Profession: A New Attack on an Old Problem.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 30 (4): 221–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Michael A. 2014. A Perilous Progress: Economists and Public Purpose in Twentieth-Century America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bjork, Samuel, Offer, Avner, and Söderberg, Gabriel. 2014. “Time Series Citation Data: the Nobel Prize in Economics.” Scientometrics 98 (1): 185–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boustan, Leah, and Langan, Andrew. 2019. “Variation in Women’s Success across PhD Programs in Economics.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 33 (1): 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvajalino, Juan. 2018. “Samuelson’s Operationally Meaningful Theorems: Reflections of E. B. Wilson’s Methodological Attitude.” Journal of Economic Methodology 25 (2): 143–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, Ho Fai, Frey, Bruno S., Gallus, Jana, and Torgler, Benno. 2013. “Does the John Bates Clark Medal Boost Subsequent Productivity and Citation Success?” Working paper No. 4419. Munich: Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute (CESifo).Google Scholar
Cherrier, Beatrice. 2014. “Toward a History of Economics at MIT, 1940–72.” History of Polical Economy 46 (5): 15–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherrier, Beatrice. 2017. “Classifying Economics: A History of the JEL Codes.” Journal of Economic Literature 55 (2): 545–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherrier, Beatrice, and Svorenčík, Andrej. 2018. “The Quantitative Turn in the History of Economics: Promises, Perils and Challenges.” Journal of Economic Methodology 25 (4): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darity, William Jr, and Arden, Kreeger. 2014. “The Desegregation of an Elite Economics Department’s PhD Program: Black Americans at MIT.” Supplement, History of Political Economy 46: 317–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fontaine, Philippe. 2010. “Stabilizing American Society: Kenneth Boulding and the Integration of the Social Sciences, 1943–1980.” Science in Context 23 (2): 221–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frandsen, Tove Faber, and Nicolaisen, Jeppe. 2013. “The Ripple Effect: Citation Chain Reactions of a Nobel Prize.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64 (3): 437–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Robert Marc. 2001. The Politics of Excellence: Behind the Nobel Prize in Science. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
Hoover, Kevin D., and Svorenčík, Andrej. 2019. “Who Runs the AEA?” Center for the History of Political Economy (CHOPE) Working Paper Series No. 2020–03.Google Scholar
Igersheim, Herrade. 2019. “The Death of Welfare Economics: History of a Controversy.” History of Political Economy 51 (5): 827–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundberg, Shelly, and Stearns, Jenna. 2019. “Women in Economics: Stalled Progress.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 33 (1): 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirowski, Philip, and Nik-Khah, Edward M.. 2017. The Knowledge We Have Lost in Information: The History of Information in Modern Economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Offer, Avner, and Söderberg, Gabriel. 2016. The Nobel Factor: The Prize in Economics, Social Democracy, and the Market Turn. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pinzón-Fuchs, Erich. 2016. “Macroeconometric Modeling as a ‘Photographic Description of Reality’ or as an ‘Engine for the Discovery of Concrete Truth’? Friedman and Klein on Statistical Illusions.” The Center for the History of Political Economy Working Paper Series No. 2016-26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Gregory N. 2009. “The Problem of the 21st Century: Economics Faculty and the Color Line.” Journal of Socio-Economics 38 (2): 331–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggles, Nancy. 1970. Economics. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Svorenčík, Andrej. 2014. “MIT’s Rise to Prominence: Outline of a Collective Biography.” History of Political Economy 46 (5): 109–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svorenčík, Andrej. 2018. “The Missing Link: Prosopography in the History of Economics.” History of Political Economy 50 (3): 605–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svorenčík, Andrej. 2019. “Prosopography: The Missing Link in the History of Economics.” In Düppe, Till and Weintraub, E. Roy, eds., A Contemporary Historiography of Economics. New York: Routledge, pp. 101–118.Google Scholar
Weintraub, , E. Roy, ed. 2014. MIT and the Transformation of American Economics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Woirol, Gregory R. 1999. “The Contributions of Frederick C. Mills.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 21 (02): 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar