Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T00:15:40.726Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“The Creation of Wealth”: John Rae's Knowledge-Based Growth Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Masazumi Wakatabe
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

John Rae is best known for his contribution to capital theory, particularly to Austrian capital theory. J. A. Schumpeter's (1954) assessment is typical in the literature: “two cornerstones of [Böhm-Bawerk]'s structure–one of them also a cornerstone of [Nassau] Senior's–are in fact there” (Schumpeter, 1954, pp. 468-69). Although this seems to have been the standard perception (see also Dorfman, 1995, p. 21), there is growing appreciation that Rae had a theory of economic development, rather than only a theory of capital. As Klaus Hennings put it: “Rae ascribes to inventions a more important role for economic progress … than capital accumulation” (Hennings, 1987, p. 40). Spengler (1959) saw Rae's contribution as “his recognition of the importance of the role of technical knowledge and invention in economic development” (ibid., 1959, p. 406; see Deans and Deans, 1972; Birchler, 1980). Syed Ahmad (1996a, 1996b) and Anthony Brewer (1990, 1991, 1996) agree on the central role of innovation in the economics of Rae.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , September 1998 , pp. 329 - 347
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ahmad, Syed. 1996a. “On John Rae's Controversial Contributions to Economics,” Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 18, Fall, 207–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmad, Syed. 1996b. “Smith's Division of Labour and Rae's “Invention”: A Study of the Second Dichotomy, with an Evaluation of the First,” History of Political Economy, 28, Fall, 441–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumol, William J. 1993. Entrepreneurship, Management, and the Structure of Payoffs, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Birchler, Urs W. 1980. John Rae (1796–1872), Seine Theorie der wirtschftliche Entwicklung, Peter Lang, Bern.Google Scholar
Böhm-Bawerk, Eugen von. 1959. Capital and Interest, vol. 1, History and Critique of Interest Theories, translated by Huncke, George E. and Sennholz, Hans F., Libertarian Press, South Holland.Google Scholar
Brewer, Anthony. 1990. “John Rae's Theory of Capital and Economic Growth,” in Douglas, Mair, ed., The Scottish Contribution to Modern Economic Thought, Aberdeen University Press, Aberdeen, 281–92.Google Scholar
Brewer, Anthony. 1991. “Economic Growth and Technological Change: John Rae's Critique of Adam Smith,” History of Political Economy, 23, Spring, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Anthony. 1996. “Innovation and Economic Development: Rae and Schumpeter,” paper presented at John Rae Bicentenary Conference, Aberdeen, Scotland, March 27–29.Google Scholar
Deans, Robert H. and Janet S., Deans. 1972. “John Rae and the Problems of Economic Development,” Review of Social Economy, 30, 97–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimand, Robert W. 1996. “Rae and International Trade,” paper presented at John Rae Bicentenary Conference, Aberdeen, Scotland, March 27–29.Google Scholar
Dorfman, Robert. 1995. “Austrian and American Capital Theories: A Contrast of Cultures,” Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 17, Spring, 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennings, Klaus H. 1987. “John Rae,” in John, Eatwellet al., ed., The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, 3, Macmillan, New York and London, 39–40.Google Scholar
Hollander, Samuel. 1987. Classical Economics, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hollander, Samuel. 1997. The Economics of Thomas Robert Malthus, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howitt, Peter. 1994. “Adjusting to Technological Change,” Canadian Journal of Economics, 27, Nov., 763–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howitt, Peter. 1996. “On Some Problems in Measuring Knowledge-Based Growth,” in Peter, Howitt, ed., The Implications of Knowledge-Based Growth for Micro-Economic Policies, University of Calgary Press, Calgary, 9–29.Google Scholar
James, R. Warren. 1965. John Rae, Political Economist: An Account of His Life and a Compilation of His Main Writings, 2 vols., University of Toronto Press, Toronto.Google Scholar
Macfie, Alec L. 1955. “The Scottish Tradition in Economic Thought,” Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 1, 81–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mair, Douglas. 1990. “John Rae: Ugly Duckling or Black Swan?” Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 37, 275–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mixter, Charles W. ed. 1905. The Sociological Theory of Capital, being a Complete Reprint of the New Principles of Political Economy 1834, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
Niehans, Jürg. 1990. A History of Economic Theory, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Rae, John. 1825. “Sketches of the Origin and Progress of Manufactures and of the Policy which has Regulated Their Legislative Encouragement in Great Britain and in Other Countries”; reprinted in James 1965, 1, 195–206.Google Scholar
Rae, John. 1834. Statement of Some New Principles on the Subject of Political Economy, Exposing the Fallacies of the System of Free Trade, and of Some Other Doctrines Maintained in the “Wealth of Nations,” Hillard, Gray, and Co, Boston; reprint, Augustus M. Kelley, New York, 1964; reprinted in James 1965, 2.Google Scholar
Rae, John. ca. 1854. “Letter to J. S. Mill (draft),” in James 1965, 1, 430–37.Google Scholar
Romer, Paul M. 1994. “The Origins of Endogenous Growth,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, Winter, 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, Nathan. 1982. “How Exogenous is Science?” in Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 141–59.Google Scholar
Rymes, Thomas K. 1996. “John Rae: Capital and Growth Theory,” paper presented at John Rae Bicentenary Conference, Aberdeen, Scotland, March 27–29.Google Scholar
Scherer, Fred M. 1965. “Invention and Innovation in the Watt–Bolton Steam Engine Venture,” Technology and Culture, 6, Spring, 165–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1934. The Theory of Economic Development, English translation by Redvers Opie, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1954. History of Economic Analysis, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Spengler, Joseph J. 1959. “John Rae on Economic Development: A Note,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 73, 393–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wakatabe, Masazumi. 1996. “John Rae as a Monetary Economist: Another Scottish Tradition in a Canadian Setting,” paper presented at John Rae Bicentenary Conference, Aberdeen, Scotland, March 27–29.Google Scholar