Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T05:37:44.654Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Law of Conservation of Matter and Energy in the History of Economic Thought

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Extract

The development of economic thinking has seldom taken place entirely independently of developments in other disciplines. There is a long history of interdisciplinary influences among economics, mathematics, physics, biology, and philosophy. Among the most influential of these other disciplines has been physics. Numerous authors have attributed significant influence upon economics to Newtonian mechanics (Taylor 1960, Georgescu-Roegen 1971). The strength of that influence is perhaps best illustrated by William Stanley Jevons's proclamation of his attempt to reconstruct economics as “the mechanics of utility and self interest.“ Frank Knight, having observed what Jevons and others had wrought, concluded that mechanics had become the “sister science” of economics (Knight 1976, p. 85).

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Angsist, Stanley and Hepler, Loren. 1967. Order and Chaos: Law of Energy and Entropy, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Daly, Herman. 1980. “The Economic Thought of Frederick Soddy,History of Political Economy, 12, no. 4, Winter, 469488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgescu-Roegen, Nicholas. 1971. The Entropy Law and the Economic Process, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jevons, William Stanley. 1965a. The Coal Question, 3rd ed., Kelley, Augustus M., New York.Google Scholar
Jevons, William Stanley. 1965b. The Principles of Economics, Kelley, Augustus M., New York.Google Scholar
Knight, Frank. 1976. The Ethics of Competition, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Knight, Frank. 1933. The Economic Organization, Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
Marshall, Alfred. 1961. Principles of Economics, 5th ed., Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1965. Principles of Political Economy, Augustus Kelley, New York.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1968. Essays on Some Unsettled Questions of Political Economy, Kelley, Augustus M., New York.Google Scholar
Mirowski, Philip. 1988. Against Mechanism: Protecting Economics from Science, Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, Maryland.Google Scholar
Pasour, E.C. 1981. “Economic Efficiency: Touchstone or Mirage,Intercollegiate Review, 17, no. 1, Fall, 3346.Google Scholar
Say, J.B. 1803. A Treatise on Political Economy, reprint of translation, Kelley, Augustus M., New York.Google Scholar
Sowell, Thomas. 1980. Knowledge and Decisions, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Taylor, Overton. 1960. A History of Economic Thought, MacGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Andrew, Von Melsen. 1967. “Atomism,” Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar