Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T13:53:38.448Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Steinberg Character of a Finite Simple Group of Lie Type

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

Bhama Srinivasan
Affiliation:
The Ramanujan InstituteUniversity of MadrasMadras–5, India and Clark University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Let K be an algebraically closed field of characteristic ρ >0. If G is a connected, simple connected, semisimple linear algebraic group defined over K and σ an endomorphism of G onto G such that the subgroup Gσ of fixed points of σ is finite, Steinberg ([6] [7]) has shown that there is a complex irreducible character χ of Gσ with the following properties. χ vanishes at all elements of Gσ which are not semi- simple, and, if xG is semisimple, χ(x) = ±n(x) where n(x)is the order of a Sylow p-subgroup of (ZG(x))σ (ZG(x) is the centraliser of x in G). If G is simple he has, in [6], identified the possible groups Gσ they are the Chevalley groups and their twisted analogues over finite fields, that is, the ‘simply connected’ versions of finite simple groups of Lie type. In this paper we show, under certain restrictions on the type of the simple algebraic group G an on the characteristic of K, that χ can be expressed as a linear combination with integral coefficients of characters induced from linear characters of certain naturally defined subgroups of Gσ. This expression for χ gives an explanation for the occurence of n(x) in the formula for χ (x), and also gives an interpretation for the ± 1 occuring in the formula in terms of invariants of the reductive algebraic group ZG(x).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1971

References

[1]Chevalley, C., Seminaire sur la classification des groups deLie algebriques (Paris, 1958).Google Scholar
[2]Kondo, K., ‘The characters of the Weyl group of type F4’, Jour. Fac. Sci. Univ. of Tokyo 11 (1965), 145153.Google Scholar
[3]Lang, S., ‘Algebraic groups over finite fields’, Amer. J. Math. 78 (1956), 555563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Shephard, G. C., and Todd, J. A., ‘Finite unitary reflection groups’, Canadian J. Math. 6 (1954), 274304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Solomon, L., ‘Invariants of finite reflection groups’, Nagoya Math. J. 22 (1963), 5764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Steinberg, R., Endomorphism of linear algebraic groups (Memoirs of the American Math. Society, No. 80).Google Scholar
[7]Steinberg, R., ‘Representations of algebraic groups’, Nagoya Math. J. 22 (1963), 3356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Suzuki, M., ‘On a class of doubly transitive groups’, Annals of Math. 75 (1962), 105145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Ward, H. N., ‘On Ree's series of simple groups’, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 121 (1966), 6289.Google Scholar
[10]Osima, M., ‘On the representations of the generalized symmetric group’, Math. J. Okayama Univ. 4 (1954), 3955.Google Scholar
[11]Added in proof. A description of the one-to-one correspondence mentioned after Lemma 1 is contained in Springer, T. A. and Steinberg, R., Seminar on Algebraic Groups and Related Finite Groups (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, No. 131, Springer-Verlag, 1970).Google Scholar