Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-4thr5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T08:47:53.797Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Differences of functions and measures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

R. E. Edwards
R. E. Edwards
Affiliation:
Department of MathematicsInstitute of Advanced Studies Australian National University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Throughout this paper, G will denote a locally compact Hausdorff group with a chosen left Haar measure m. For each s ∈ G, τs denotes the left translation operator which acts on functions ƒ according to the rule; τsƒ(x) = ƒ(s−1x) and on measures or distributions in the corresponding way. The associted left difference operators ts−1 is denoted by Δs. On occasions it will be more convenient to write τ(s) and Δ(s) in place of τs and Δs.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , May 1968 , pp. 250 - 268
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1968

References

[1]de Bruijn, N. G., ‘Functions whose differences belong to a given class’, Nieuw Arch. Wiskunde (2) 23 (1951). 194–218.Google Scholar
[2]de Bruijn, N. G., ‘A difference property for Riemann integrable functions and for some similar classes of functions, Nederl. Akad. Wetensch. Proc. Ser. A 55 (1952), 145–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Edwards, R. E., ‘Translates of L∞ functions and of bounded measures’, J. Austr. Math. Soc. 4 (1964), 304–409.Google Scholar
[4]Edwards, R. E., Functional Analysis Theory and Applications (Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc., New York, 1965).Google Scholar
[5]Schwartz, L., Théorie des Distributions, Tomes I, II (Hermann et Cie, Paris, 1950, 1951).Google Scholar
[6]Edwards, R. E., ‘Criteria for Fourier transforms’. J. Austr. Math. Soc. 7 (1967), 239–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Rudin, W., Fourier analysis on groups (Interscience Publishers, New York, 1962).Google Scholar
[8]Edwards, R. E., ‘Uniform approximation on noncompact spaces’. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 122 (1966), 249–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Edwards, R. E., ‘Supports and singular supports of pseudomeasures’, J. A ustr. Math. Soc. 6 (1966), 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Edwards, R. E., ‘Changing signs of Fourier coefficients’, Pacific J. Math. 15 (1965), 463–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Kahane, J.-P. et Salem, R., Ensembles parfaits et séries trigonométriques (Hermann et Cie, Paris, 1963).Google Scholar
[12]Bary, N., A treatise on trigonometric series, Vols. I, II (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1964).Google Scholar
[13]Hewitt, E. and Ross, K. A., Abstract Harmonic Analysis, I (Springer-Verlag, BerlinGöttingen-Heidelberg, 1963).Google Scholar
[14]Kemperman, J. H. B., ‘A general functional equation’, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 86 (1957), 28–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Carroll, F. W., ‘Functions whose differences belong to Lp (0, 1)’, Nederl. Akad. Wetensch. Proc. Ser. A 67 (1964), 250–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Carroll, F. W., ‘A difference property for polynomials and exponential polynomials on abelian locally compact groups’, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 114 (1965), 147–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar