Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T15:22:02.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Critical associated metrics on contact manifolds III

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

David E. Blair
Affiliation:
Michigan State UniversityEast Lansing, Michigan 48824-1027, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the first paper of this series we studied on a compact regular contact manifold the integral of the Ricci curvature in the direction of the characteristic vector field considered as a functional on the set of all associated metrics. We showed that the critical points of this functional are the metrics for which the characteristic vector field generates a 1-parameter group of isometries and conjectured that the result might be true without the regularity of the contact structure. In the present paper we show that this conjecture is false by studying this problem on the tangent sphere bundle of a Riemannian manifold. In particular the standard associated metric is a critical point if and only if the base manifold is of constant curvature +1 or −1; in the latter case the characteristic vector field does not generate a 1-parameter group of isometries.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1991

References

[1]Blair, D. E., Contact manifolds in Riemannian geometry, Lecture Notes in Math. 509, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1976.Google Scholar
[2]Blair, D. E., ‘On the non-regularity of tangent sphere bundles’, Proc. Royal Soc. Edinburgh Sect A 82 (1978), 1317.Google Scholar
[3]Blair, D. E., ‘Critical associated metrics on contact manifolds’, J. Austral. Math. Soc. Ser.A 37 (1984), 8288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Blair, D. E. and Ledger, A. J., ‘Critical associated metrics on contact manifolds II’, J. Austral. Math. Soc. Ser. A 41 (1986), 404410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Boothby, W. M. and Wang, H. C., ‘On contact manifolds’, Ann. of Math. 68 (1958), 721734.Google Scholar
[6]Cartan, E., Geometry of Riemannian spaces, Math. Sci. Press, Brookline, Mass., 1983.Google Scholar
[7]Chern, S.S. and Hamilton, R. S., On Riemannian metrics adapted to three-dimensional contact manifolds, Lecture Notes in Math., 1111, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985, pp. 279308.Google Scholar
[8]Dombrowski, P., ‘On the geometry of the tangent bundle’, J. Reine Angew. Math. 210 (1962), 7388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Kowalski, O., ‘Curvature of the induced Riemannian metric on the tangent bundle of a Riemannian manifold’, J. Reine Angew. Math. 250 (1971), 124129.Google Scholar
[10]Tachibana, S. and Okumura, M., ‘On the almost complex structure of tangent bundles of Riemannian spaces’, Tôhoku Math.J. 14 (1962), 156161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Tanno, S., ‘Variational problems on contact Riemannian manifolds’, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 314 (1989), 349379.Google Scholar
[12]Tashiro, Y., ‘On contact structures of tangent sphere bundles’, Tôhoku Math. J. 21 (1969), 117143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar