Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T15:12:16.468Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the possibility of a Σ21 well-ordering of the Baire space

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Richard Mansfield*
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802

Extract

It is well known that the hypothesis that all real numbers are constructible in the sense of Gödel [1] implies the existence of a Σ21 well-ordering of the Baire space [1, p. 67]. We are concerned with the converse to this theorem. From the assumption of the existence of a Σ21 well-ordering with total domain, we derive various consequences which in the presence of a nonconstructible real seem highly pathological. However, while several of these consequences are obviously absurd, none have as yet been disproven. Indeed some of the stranger consistency proofs of Jensen seem to indicate that there is a possibility that they may be consistent. I am referring to such results as existence of a model for ZF set theory in which the degrees of constructibility form a sequence of type ω + 1 with the (ω + 1)st degree being the only one which contains a nonconstructible real, and that degree being the degree of a Δ31 nonconstructible real.

In what follows we shall use the small Greek letters α, β, γ to range over the Baire space NN where N is the set of natural numbers. We assume that the reader is familiar with the use of trees to encode closed subsets of this space. The class Σ21 is the collection of all those subsets of the Baire space which can be defined by a formula which is Σ21 in a constructible parameter. Correspondingly Π21 will be taken to mean Π11 in a constructible parameter. The proof of the first lemma is left as an exercise. It involves nothing more than coding perfect sets by trees and then counting quantifiers.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

[1]Gödel, K., The consistency of the continuum hypothesis (2nd edition), Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Mansfield, Richard, Perfect subsets of definable sets of reals, Pacific Journal of Mathematics, vol. 35 (1970), pp. 451457.Google Scholar
[3]Mansfield, Richard, The theory of Σ21 sets, Doctoral Dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., 1970.Google Scholar
[4]Shoenfield, J. R., Mathematical logic, Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park, Calif., 1967.Google Scholar
[5]Shoenfield, J. R., The problem of predicativity, Essays on the foundations of mathematics, Magnes Press, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, 1961.Google Scholar
[6]Solovay, R. M., The cardinality of Σ21 sets, Foundations of mathematics, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1968.Google Scholar
[7]Solovay, R. M., A nonconstructible Δ31 set of integers, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 127 (1967), pp. 5075.Google Scholar