Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T19:08:51.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On precipitousness of the nonstationary ideal over a supercompact

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Moti Gitik*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel

Extract

Namba [N] proved that the nonstationary ideal over a measurable (NSκ) cannot be κ+-saturated. Baumgartner, Taylor and Wagon [BTW] asked if it is possible for NSκ to be precipitous over a measurable κ. A model with this property was constructed by the author, and shortly after Foreman, Magidor and Shelah [FMS] proved a general theorem that after collapsing of a supercompact or even a superstrong to the successor of κ, NSκ became precipitous. This theorem implies that it is possible to have the nonstationary ideal precipitous over even a supercompact cardinal. Just start with a supercompact κ and a superstrong λ > κ. Make supercompactness of κ indistractible as in [L] and then collapse λ to be κ+.

The aim of our paper is to show that the existence of a supercompact cardinal alone already implies the consistency of the nonstationary ideal precipitous over a supercompact. The proof gives also the following: if κ is a λ-supercompact for λ ≥ (2κ)+, then there exists a generic extension in which κ is λ-supercompact and NSκ is precipitous. Thus, for a model with NSκ precipitous over a measurable we need a (2κ)+-supercompact cardinal κ. Jech [J] proved that the precipitous of NSκ over a measurable κ implies the existence of an inner model with o(κ) = κ+ + 1. In §3 we improve this result a little by showing that the above assumption implies an inner model with a repeat point.

The paper is organized as follows. In §1 some preliminary facts are proved. The model with NSκ precipitous over a supercompact is constructed in §2.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[BTW]Baumgartner, J., Taylor, A. and Wagon, S., On splitting stationary subsets of large cardinals, this Journal, vol. 42 (1977), pp. 203214.Google Scholar
[FMS]Foreman, M., Magidor, M. and Shelah, S., Martin's maximum, saturated ideals and nonregular ultrafilters. I, II (to appear).Google Scholar
[G1]Gitik, M., The nonstationary ideal on ℵ2, Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 48 (1984), pp. 257288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[G2]Gitik, M., Changing cofinalities and the nonstationary ideal (to appear).Google Scholar
[J]Jech, T., Stationary subsets of inaccessible cardinals, Axiomatic set theory, Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 31, American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, 1984, pp. 115142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[L]Laver, R., Making the supercompactness of κ indestructible under κ-directed closed forcing, Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 29 (1978), pp. 385388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Ma]Mathias, A. R. D., Sequences in the sense of Prikry, Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society, vol. 15 (1973), pp. 409414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Mi1]Mitchell, W., Sets constructible from sequences of ultrafilters, this Journal, vol. 39 (1974), pp. 5766.Google Scholar
[Mi2]Mitchell, W., How weak is a closed unbounded ultrafilter?Logic Colloquium '80 (van Dalen, D.et al., editors), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982, pp. 209230.Google Scholar
[Mi3]Mitchell, W., The core model for sequences of measures, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, vol. 95 (1984), pp. 229260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Mi4]Mitchell, W., Indiscernibles, skies, and ideals, Axiomatic set theory, Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 31, American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, 1984, pp. 161182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[N]Namba, K., On the closed unbounded ideals of ordinal numbers, Commentarii Mathematici Universitatis Sancti Pauli, vol. 22 (1984), pp. 3356.Google Scholar
[P]Prikry, K., Changing measurable into accessible cardinals, Dissertationes Mathematicae Rozprawy Matematyczne, vol. 68 (1970).Google Scholar
[R]Radin, L., Adding closed cofinal sequences to large cardinals, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 23 (1982), pp. 263283.Google Scholar
[S]Shelah, S., Proper forcing, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 940, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[SRK]Solovay, R., Reinhardt, W. and Kanamori, A., Strong axioms of infinity and elementary embeddings, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 13 (1978), pp. 73116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar