Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T19:34:49.090Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Indecomposable ultrafilters over small large cardinals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Michael Sheard*
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley, California 94720

Extract

Indecomposability of ultrafilters was introduced by Keisler as a natural weakening of the concept of measurability. The property was first studied in depth by Chudnovsky and Chudnovsky, Prikry, and Silver (see [4] and [5]). One intriguing result of this early work was the following theorem: if κ is an inaccessible cardinal and there is an indecomposable ultrafilter over κ, then κ is in fact ω-Mahlo. Silver asked whether this result could be strengthened to say that an inaccessible cardinal carrying an indecomposable ultrafilter must be measurable. We prove in this paper that this is not the case; we construct a model where κ is inaccessible and carries an indecomposable ultrafilter but κ is not even weakly compact.

The results in this paper form part of the research for my doctoral dissertation at the University of California, Berkeley. I would like to thank my thesis advisor, Robert Solovay, for his patient guidance during this endeavor.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Jech, T., Set theory, Academic Press, New York, 1978.Google Scholar
[2]Kanamori, A. and Magidor, M., The evolution of large cardinal axioms inset theory, Higher set theory, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 669, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1978, pp. 99275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Kunen, K., Saturated ideals, this Journal, vol. 43 (1978), pp. 6576.Google Scholar
[4]Prikry, K., On descendingly complete ultrafilters, Cambridge Summer School in Mathematical Logic, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 337, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1973, pp. 459488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Silver, J., Indecomposable ultrafilters and 0*, Proceedings of the Tarski Symposium, Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol. 25, American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I., 1974, pp. 357364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Donder, D., Jensen, R.B. and Koppelberg, B.J., Some applications of the core model, Set theory and model theory (Proceedings of a Symposium, Bonn, 1979), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 872, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1981, pp. 5597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar