Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T18:04:30.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Encodability of Kleene's O

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Carl G. Jockusch Jr.
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801
Robert I. Soare
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Chicago Circle, Chicago, Illinois 60680

Extract

Let ω be the nonnegative integers. G. E. Sacks once asked whether there exists an infinite Xω such that, for all YX, ω1Yω1 where ω1 is the first nonrecursive ordinal. In this note we negatively answer this question by giving a simple proof that for every infinite set Xω there exists YX such that the first recursively inaccessible ordinal. This is accomplished by proving that Hα is hyper-arithmetic in Y whereHα is the αth hyperjump of the empty set ∅, defined in a suitable sense for all ordinals

Background information and undefined notation can be found in Rogers [11]. In particular, we write AhB(A ≤T B) if A is hyperarithmetical (recursive) in B, and AhB if AhB and BhA. We will say that a set A is hyperarithmetically (recursively) encodable if, for every infinite set Xω, there exists YX such that AhY (ATY). For any set A (hyperdegree a) let A′ (a′) denote the hyperjump of A (a). Let 0 denote the hyperdegree of ∅. A function f majorizes a function g if f(n)g(n) for every n. E1 is the representing (type-2) functional of

introduced by Tugué [13] (also Kleene [6]). Let be the smallest ordinal which is not the order type of any well-ordering recursive in E1. Information on can be found in Richter [9] and [10].

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Friedman, H., Borel sets and hyperdegrees, this Journal, vol. 38 (1973), pp. 405409.Google Scholar
[2]Jockusch, C. G. Jr., Uniformly introreducible sets, this Journal, vol. 33 (1968), pp. 521536.Google Scholar
[3]Jockusch, C. G. Jr., Encodable sets (in preparation).Google Scholar
[4]Jockusch, C. G. Jr., and Soare, R. I., Π10 classes and degrees of theories, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 173 (1972), pp. 3356.Google Scholar
[5]Jockusch, C. G. Jr., and Soare, R. I., Degrees of members of Π10 classes, Pacific Journal of Mathematics, vol. 40 (1972), pp. 605616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Kleene, S. C., Recursive functionals and quantifiers of finite types, II, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 108 (1963), pp. 106142.Google Scholar
[7]Mathias, A. R. D., On a generalization of Ramsey's theorem, Notices of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 15 (1968), p. 931. Abstract 68T-E19.Google Scholar
[8]Mathias, A. R. D., Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (to appear).Google Scholar
[9]Richter, W., Constructive transfinite number classes, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 73 (1967), pp. 261265.Google Scholar
[10]Richter, W., Constructively accessible ordinal numbers, this Journal, vol. 33 (1968), pp. 4355.Google Scholar
[11]Rogers, H. Jr., Recursive functions and effective computability, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967.Google Scholar
[12]Soare, R. I., Sets with no subset of higher degree, this Journal, vol. 34 (1969), pp. 5356.Google Scholar
[13]Tugué, T., Predicates recursive in a type-2 object and Kleene hierarchies, Commentarii Mathematici Universitatis Sancti Pauli, vol. 8 (1960), pp. 97117.Google Scholar