Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-14T01:38:06.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kampungs and Conflict in Colonial Semarang*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

James L. Cobban
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

By the beginning of the twentieth century, Semarang was a major port city and administrative centre on Java. Attainment of this position was due partly to the expansion of its hinterland during the nineteenth century. This expansion was closely related to developments in the means of transportation and the consequent ability of plantation owners to bring the products of their plantations to the port for shipment to foreign markets. By the end of the century virtually the whole economic life of central Java focused upon Semarang. The city also exercised administrative functions in the Dutch colonial administration and generally had been responsible for Dutch interests in the middle and eastern parts of the island. The importance of Semarang as an administrative centre increased after 1906. In that year the government incorporated the city as an urban municipality (stadsgemeente). In 1914 it had consular representation from the United States, Belgium, Denmark, France, Great Britain, Italy, Norway, Germany, and Thailand. Subsequently, in 1926 it became the capital of the Province of Central Java under the terms of an administrative reform fostered by the colonial government at Batavia. Status as an urban municipality meant that local officials sitting on a city council would govern the domestic affairs of the city. The members of the city council at first were appointed from Batavia, subsequently some of them were elected by residents of the city. By the beginning of the twentieth century Semarang had enhanced its position as a major port on the north coast of the island of Java. It was one of the foremost cities of the Dutch East Indies, along with Batavia and Surabaya, a leading port and a centre of administration and trade. This article outlines the growth of the port of Semarang during the nineteenth century and discusses some of the conflict related to this growth over living conditions in parts of the city during the twentieth century, a conflict which smouldered for several decades among the government, members of the city council, and the non-European residents of the city, one which remained unresolved at the end of the colonial era.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Southeast Asian Studies , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , September 1988 , pp. 266 - 291
Copyright
Copyright © The National University of Singapore 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Vogel, De, Memorie van overgave van de Residentie Semarang, dated 3 Maart 1914. Contained in Mailrapport 1133/14, Department van Binnenlandse Zaken, The HagueGoogle Scholar.

2 Schrieke, J.J., Inleiding in het Staatsrecht van Nederlands-Indie (Haarlem: Tjeenk Willink & Zoon, 1940), p. 70Google Scholar.

3 Flieringa, Gellius, De Zorg voor de Volkshuisvesting in de Stadsgemeenten in Nederlandsch Oost Indie in het Bijzonder in Semarang (Amsterdam: Van Leer, 1930), p. 275Google Scholar.

4 van de Wetering, F.H., “Kampongverbetering”, Koloniale Studien 23 jaargang, no. 4 (08 1939): 315Google Scholar.

5 Tillema, H.F., Over't vraagstuk van “het Wonen” in Kromo's groote land (’s-Gravenhage: H. Uden Masman, 1915–1922), 5 volsGoogle Scholar. Reference is to vol. 1, map facing page 133 drawn in 1835–40 by W. Meyer.

6 Stibbe, D.G., Encyclopaedie van Nederlandsch-Indie (’s-Gravenhage: Martinus Nijhoff, 1919), tweede druk, derde deel, p. 742Google Scholar. For a map of Semarang at the beginning of the twentieth century see Eckstein, C.A. (ed.), Atlas van Nederlandsch Oost-Indie (’s-Gravenhage: Department van Kolonien, 1907), p. 4Google Scholar. The information in this atlas was collected between the years 1897–1904.

7 Verslag an den Toestand der Gemeente Semarang over 1914 (Semarang: G.C.T. van Dorp, 1915), p. 149Google Scholar.

8 Kerchman, F.W.M., 25 Jaren Decentralisatie in Nederlandsch-Indie 1905–1930 (Semarang: Vereeniging voor Locale Belangen, 1930)Google Scholar. A map showing the boundaries of Semarang and land use in 1930 is on page 153. Boundary changes in 1919 recorded in Indische Staatsblad no. 524 and in 1920 recorded in Indische Staatsblad no. 622. In 1917 the city by a decision dated 14 September decided to expand its boundaries. See Verslag over 1917 (Semarang: G.C.T. van Dorp, 1918), pp. 295–96Google Scholar. The reports around this time talk of expansion plans and of the expropriation of private estates.

9 In 1902 van den Berg portrayed the desa as a village with houses set in compounds with fruit trees and other growing plants and surrounded by arable land. Kampungs comprised the built-up part of the desa and possessed no arable land. Kampung also had the meaning of ward or district (wijk) in a large city if the district had no self-government. van den Berg, L.W.C., “Het Inlandsche Gemeentewezen op Java en Madura”, Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land-en Volkenkunde van Nederlandsch-Indie 52 (1901): 20–21Google Scholar.

10 Kleintjes, Ph., Staatsinstellingen van Nederlandsch-Indie (Amsterdam: J.H. de Bussey, 1933), tweede deel, p. 179Google Scholar. The guarantee originally appeared in article 71, paragraph 2 of the Regeringsreglement of 1854. This became article 128, paragraph 3 of the 1925 and subsequent revisions of the Constitution which became the Wet op de Staatsinrichting van Nederlandsche-Indie revised in 1936. The revised constitution is reprinted in Voornaamste Voorschriften Betreffende de Decentralisatie en Bestuurshervorming (Batavia: Landsdrukerij, 1938), pp. 12–48Google Scholar.

11 De Tramwegen op Java (’s-Gravenhage: M.M. Couvee, 1907), p. 10Google Scholar. This book is a memorial volume commemorating the twenty-fifth anniversary of the Semarang-Joana Steamtram Company.

12 Tramwegen, p. 86 and p. 86 footnote 2Google Scholar.

13 Tramwegen, p. 99Google Scholar.

14 Tramwegen, Bijlage V.

15 Tramwegen, p. 99 and Bijlage VGoogle Scholar.

16 Indische Staatsblad, No. 120, 21 February 1906 to take effect 1 April 1906.

17 Locale Belangen (LB), 9 jaargang, aflevering 5 (1921): 151Google Scholar; LB 11 jaargang, aflevering 5 (1924): 650Google Scholar; Slamet, , “Uitbreiding Indonesische zetels in Gemeenteraden”, LB 14 jaargang, aflevering 10 (1927): 329–36. Reference on p. 333Google Scholar.

18 Woesthoff, P.W., De Indische Decentralisatie-Wetgeving (Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1915), p. 42Google Scholar; Schrieke, J.J., Bepalingen en Beginselen der Decentralisatie van 1903 (Weltevreden: Commissie voor de Volkslecteur, 1920), p. 7Google Scholar.

19 Schrieke, , Inleiding, pp. 159–60Google Scholar.

20 Stibbe, , Encyclopaedie, vol. 1 (1917), p. 575Google Scholar.

21 Verslag over 1918 (Semarang: G.C.T. van Dorp, 1919), pp. 77–84Google Scholar discusses financial policy, the principles upon which borrowings should be based, and the minicipal activities upon which the borrowed money could be spent.

22 Schrieke, , Bepalingen, pp. 15, 49Google Scholar.

23 van Kempen, Th., “Het recht tot zelfbelasting der Javasche Gemeenten”, LB 17 jaargang, aflevering 17 (1930): 857–62Google Scholar. Reference on p. 858. For a discussion of the need to borrow for capital improvements see Mol., J., “Leeningen voor Duurzaamheidswerken”, LB 14 jaargang, aflevering 24 (1927): 1032–1040Google Scholar. For a discussion of borrowing for improvement and maintenance see de Raad, C., “Leeningen voor niet-productieve werken”, LB 11 jaargang, aflevering 18 (1924): 529–33Google Scholar.

24 Verslag over 1915 (Semarang: G.C.T. van Dorp, 1916), p. 93Google Scholar.

25 Schrieke, , Bepalingen, pp. 35, 42Google Scholar.

26 Schrieke, , Bepalingen, pp. 22ffGoogle Scholar; Woesthoff, , Decentralisatie-Wetgeving, pp. 128–29Google Scholar.

27 Ruckert, J.J., “Beknopt historisch overzicht omtrent het kampongvraagstuk binnen de Stadsgemeenten”, LB 15 jaargang, aflevering 5 (1928): 209–214Google Scholar. Reference on p. 209; Flieringa, , Zorg, p. 37Google Scholar; Schrieke, J.J., Ontstaan en groei der stads-en landgemeenten in Nederlandsch-Indie (Amsterdam: de Bussy, 1918), p. 137Google Scholar.

28 Tillema, , Vraagstuk, vol. 1 (1915–1916), p. 152Google Scholar.

29 Flieringa, , Zorg, Bijlage IV C, p. 277Google Scholar. A map on page 33 shows the 137 desa jurisdictions and the following two pages list their names.

30 Ruckert, J.J., “Pestgevaar en zijn indirecte gevolgen”, LB 8 jaargang, aflevering 4 (1902): 101–106Google Scholar. Reference is on p. 106.

31 Stibbe, , Encyclopaedie, vol. 3 (1919), pp. 389–91Google Scholar. Bubonic plague occurred subsequently in Surabaya and in villages in central Java. Plague in Semarang is discussed by Ruckert, , “Pestgevaar”, pp. 102–106Google Scholar. Its first occurrence in Semarang is mentioned in Verslag over 1916 (Semarang: G.C.T. van Dorp, 1917), pp. 211–12Google Scholar.

32 Verslag over 1918, p. 246Google Scholar.

33 Tillema, , Vraagstuk, vol. 2 (1916), pp. 151–52Google Scholar.

34 Later, J.F., “Inlandsche Belangstelling in de Locale Raden”, LB 11 jaargang, aflevering 20 (1924): 585–93Google Scholar. Reference on p. 588.

35 Ruckert, J.J., “De Regeering en de Inlandsche bevolking der groote Gemeenten”, LB 11 jaargang, aflevering 19 (1924): 557–63Google Scholar. Reference to pp. 558–59.

36 LB 11 jaargang, aflevering 21 (1924): 649Google Scholar.

37 LB 14 jaargang, aflevering 22 (1927): 927–28Google Scholar.

38 Verslag over 1928 (Semarang, Misset, 1929), p. 6Google Scholar.

39 V.K., , “De Inheemsche bevolking en de Gemeenteverordeningen”, LB 15 jaargang, aflevering 9 (1928): 451–57Google Scholar. Reference on p. 454.

40 de Raad, G., “De Decentralisatie in debat”, LB 14 jaargang, aflevering 14 (1927): 501–504Google Scholar. Reference is on pp. 501–502.

41 V.K., , “Inheemsche bevolking”, pp. 454–57Google Scholar.

42 Tillema, H.F., Van Wonen en Bewonen, Van Bouwen, Huis en Erf (Tjandi-Semarang: n.p., 1913), p. 57Google Scholar.

43 Tillema, , Van Wonen, pp. 33, 45, 99Google Scholar.

44 Tillema, , Van Wonen, p. 134Google Scholar.

45 Tillema, , Vraagstuk, vol. 1 (1915–1916), p. 30Google Scholar.

46 Reprinted in Tillema, , Vraagstuk, vol. 2 (1916), pp. 48–49Google Scholar.

47 The Volksraad was formed by a law of 16 December 1916 (Indische Staatsblad 1917, no. 114). Members numbered thirty-nine people at first including the chairman. Nineteen members were named by the governor-general, of which five were Indonesians and the remaining Europeans and foreign Asians, and nineteen were elected from regional and local councils, of which ten were Indonesians and the remaining Europeans and foreign Asians. In 1920 the number of members was increased to forty-nine of which eight Indonesians were named and twelve elected. In 1941 the body had sixty members. Government officials were denied membership. It met twice yearly to discuss among other things the colonial budget. Stibbe, , Encyclopaedie, vol. 4 (1921), pp. 612–23Google Scholar.

48 LB 7 jaargang, aflevering 5 (1919): 157Google Scholar.

49 LB 7 jaargang, aflevering 5 (1919): 160Google Scholar. Also Tillema, , Van Wonen, p. 138Google Scholar. Speakers commonly expressed the opinion that the government could help solve the housing problem by providing cheap building land. The editors of Locale Belangen reviewed another of Tillema's publications the illustrated brochure “Kampongwee”, in LB 7 jaargang, aflevering 10 (1919): 331–32Google Scholar.

50 Ruckert, , “Pestgevaar”, p. 101Google Scholar; LB 12 jaargang, aflevering 1 (1924): 127Google Scholar; Later, , “Inlandsche belangstelling”, pp. 585–91Google Scholar.

51 LB 14 jaargang, aflevering 10 (1927): 349–51Google Scholar. A report of the meeting first was given in a Semarang newspaper, De Locomotief. Budi Utomo was a cultural and educational organization formed on Java in 1908. Some years later it took on political aspects and in 1917 had representatives at the first meeting of the Volksraad. It had branches in many cities on Java, that of Semarang in 1918 having sixty members. After 1918 the movement lost much of its momentum as a popular organization. In 1935 it became part of the Partai Indonesia Raja (Greater Indonesian Party). Local chapters promoted the welfare of the local population. This function explains why Budi Utomo sponsored a political gathering in Semarang in 1927 to talk about kampung improvement. Nagazumi, Akira, The Dawn of Indonesian Nationalism: The Early Years of Budi Utomo, 1908–1918 (Tokyo: Institute of Developing Economies, 1972), especially pp. 1, 133, 138Google Scholar.

52 Ruckert, J.J., “Kampongverbetering in het centrum der belangstelling”, LB 15 jaargang, aflevering 5 (1928): 203–209Google Scholar. Reference is on p. 204.

53 Verslag over 1918, pp. 1–2Google Scholar.

54 The report is reprinted in Flieringa, , Zorg, pp. 261–72Google Scholar. Issuing bonds to cover the costs of kampung improvement was not an extraordinary idea. The city constantly borrowed to finance improvements in the rest of the city. Some concern existed, however, whether it was sound policy to borrow for projects which produced no income. See bibliography in note 23 above.

55 Ruckert, , “Beknopt historisch overzicht”Google Scholar.

56 Parts of the van Gigch report as well as parts of the Semarang report appear in Flieringa, , Zorg, Bijlage IV and Bijlage V, pp. 261–316Google Scholar.

57 Verslag over 1919 (Semarang: G.C.T. van Dorp, 1920), p. 6Google Scholar; Verslag over 1922 (Semarang: G.C.T. van Dorp, 1923), p. 6Google Scholar.

58 de Raad, J.G., “Het Kampongvraagstuk opgelost?”, LB 10 jaargang, aflevering 15 (1923): 455–59Google Scholar. Reference is on p. 456.

59 Verslag over 1924 (Semarang: Misset, 1925), p. 5Google Scholar.

60 Later, , “Inlandsche Belangstelling”, p. 591Google Scholar.

61 Converted at the rate of forty cents to the Dutch East Indies guilder. Federal Reserve Bulletin (Washington: Government Printing Office, 1930), vol. 16, no. 1, p. 27Google Scholar.

62 Verslag over 1926 (Semarang: Java Ien Boe Konosie, 1927), p. 4Google Scholar.

63 LB 13 jaargang, aflevering 15 (1926): 524Google Scholar.

64 LB 13 jaargang, aflevering 26 (1926): 896Google Scholar; LB 14 jaargang, aflevering 10 (1927): 349Google Scholar; LB 17 jaargang, aflevering 14 (1930): 721Google Scholar; Ruckert, J.J., “Bij de jaarwisseling”, LB 18 jaargang, aflevering 1 (1931): 1–8Google Scholar. Reference is on p. 4.

65 Flieringa, , Zorg, pp. 37–38Google Scholar.

66 Flieringa, , Zorg, p. 41Google Scholar; Ruckert, J.J., “De Decentralisatie in 1928”, LB 16 jaargang, aflevering 1 (1929): 1–7Google Scholar.

67 LB 14 jaargang, aflevering 10 (16 Mei 1927): 349Google Scholar. “De regeering is de vader van de desa en de gemeente wil haar (de desa) wel trouwen … als papa maar betaalt.”

68 Van der Wetering, , “Kampongverbetering”, p. 308Google Scholar.

69 Verslag over 1917, pp. 393–96Google Scholar.

70 Verslag over 1927, p. 4Google Scholar.

71 Verslag over 1928, pp. 2, 92Google Scholar.

72 Verslag over 1929 (Semarang: Benjamins, 1930), p. 2, 112Google Scholar; Verslag over 1930 (Semarang: Misset, 1931), pp. 83–84Google Scholar.

73 Ruckert, , “De Decentralisatie in 1928”, p. 5Google Scholar.

74 LB 16 jaargang, aflevering 6 (1929): 273Google Scholar.

75 LB 18 jaargang, aflevering 4 (1931): 137–38Google Scholar.

76 Verslag over 1930, p. 3Google Scholar.

77 LB 18 jaargang, aflevering 23 (1931): 929Google Scholar.

78 D.K., , “Centraal Behoud”, LB 14 jaargang, aflevering 18 (1927): 691–95Google Scholar.

79 R., , “De a.s. vermindering der accresuitkeering en hare gevolgen”, LB 10 jaargang, aflevering 22 (1923): 701–707Google Scholar. Reference on p. 704. See also Kerchman, F.W.M., “Het Bezuinigingsvraagstuk voor onze Indische Locale Ressorten”, LB 10 jaargang, aflevering 16 (1923): 499–507Google Scholar.

80 de Raad, G., “Twee Moties”, LB 13 jaargang, aflevering 12 (1925): 407–412Google Scholar. Reference on pp. 407–408.

81 Converted at the rate of fifty-five cents to the Netherlands guilder. Federal Reserve Bulletin (Washington: Government Printer, 1939), vol. 25, no. 1, p. 84.

82 Van der Wetering, , “Kampongverbetering”, pp. 308, 313Google Scholar. The Kampung Improvement Commission was created by a government decision of 25 May 1938, No. 30.

83 Verslag over 1916, p. 30Google Scholar.

84 Verslag over 1926, pp. 3–4Google Scholar; Verslag over 1927, p. 2Google Scholar.

85 Verslag over 1927, supplement, pp. 3–4Google Scholar; Verslag over 1928, p. 2Google Scholar.

86 Verslag over 1928, p. 92 and supplement, p. 6Google Scholar; Verslag over 1930, p. 2 and supplement, p. 3Google Scholar.

87 Verslag over 1930, supplement p. 5Google Scholar.

88 Ruckert, J.J., “De decentralisatie gedurende de laatste 25 jaren”, LB 11 jaargang, aflevering 5 (1923): 127–33Google Scholar. Reference is on p. 129.

89 De Raad, De a.s. vermindering, Mededeelingen No. 58. Dertiende Jaarvergadering van de vereeniging voor Locale Belangen op Zaterdag 30 Mei 1925 in het logegebouw te Soerabaya. Reprinted in LB 13 jaargang (1926), 57 pages. Reference on p. 5Google Scholar.

90 Verslag over 1927, supplement, p. 7Google Scholar; Verslag over 1929, supplement, p. 12Google Scholar; Verslag over 1931 (Semarang: Misset, 1932), supplement, p. 6Google Scholar.

91 Reprinted in LB 14 jaargang, aflevering 5 (1927): 143–49Google Scholar. G. Gonggrijp, “De Belastingdruk op de Inlandse Bevolking en Haar Ekonomiese Toestand.”

92 Pluvier, J.M., Overzicht van de Ontwikkeling der Nationalistische Beweging in Indonesie (’s-Gravenhage: van Hoeve, 1953), p. 30Google Scholar. Pages 29–34 describe the effects of the depression of the 1920s and 1930s on Indonesia as a whole.

93 Verslag over 1930, p. 1Google Scholar.

94 Verslag over 1932 (Semarang: Misset, 1933), p. 2Google Scholar.

95 Ruckert, J.J., “Op den goeden weg?”, LB 18 jaargang, aflevering 22 (16 11 1931): 889–94, reference on p. 889Google Scholar; de Raad, G., “Op den goeden weg?”, LB 18 jaargang, aflevering 23 (1931): 919–22, reference on p. 920Google Scholar. See also Kerchman, F.W.M., “De consequentie van het verwerpen der 10% korting ten opzichte van de voorgestelde verdere accresvermindering”, LB 18 jaargang, aflevering 16 (1931): pp. 651–53Google Scholar.

96 Abikoesno, R., “Aanleg van Stedelijke Bevolkings-kampoengs”, Locale Techniek 4 jaargang, No. 3 (1935): 9–17. Reference is on p. 9Google Scholar.

97 Tillema, , Van Wonen, pp. 138, 101Google Scholar.

98 Kahin, George McT., Nationalism and Revolution in Indonesia (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1952), pp. 24–34Google Scholar.

99 Pluvier, , Overzicht, pp. 8–19Google Scholar.