Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T01:10:10.065Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Users and Providers: Different Perspectives on Community Care Services

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Gail Wilson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Elderly clients usually express satisfaction with their services when they are asked. Surveys of clients and carers therefore have to take this tendency into account. It is important not to ask direct questions and to allow for positive, neutral and negative responses, otherwise positive responses will be overestimated. A survey of clients and carers served by a community psychogeriatric service indicated that the way a service is delivered can be more important than what is provided. The differences between staff and user perceptions of services are analysed. There are theoretical reasons for the differences connected with the combination of care and control exercised by service providers. There are also practical reasons in terms of staff perceptions, which are dominated by process, and client perceptions, which are more directly influenced by the services as they are actually delivered. Attempts to incorporate users' views into the processes of service delivery need to understand these differences and to acknowledge the limitations of user satisfaction surveys.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 22 , Issue 4 , October 1993 , pp. 507 - 526
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Age Concern (1974), ‘The attitudes of the elderly and retired’, Age Concern England, Mitcham, Surrey.Google Scholar
Arber, S., Gilbert, N. and Evandrou, M. (1988), ‘Gender, household composition and the receipt of domiciliary services by the elderly disabled’, Journal of Social Policy, 17: 2, 153–75.Google Scholar
Bebbington, A. and Davies, B. (1990), Resource Needs and Outcomes in Community Based Care, Averbury, Aldershot.Google Scholar
Billis, D. (1984), Welfare Bureaucracies, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Billis, D., Bromley, G. and Rowbottom, R. (1980), Organising Social Service Departments, Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
Billis, D. and Rowbottom, R. (1987), Organisational Design: the work levels approach, Gower, Aldershot.Google Scholar
Brannen, J. (1988), ‘The study of sensitive subjects: notes on interviewing’, The Sociological Review, 36: 3, 552–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cm 555 (1989), Working for Patients, HMSO. London.Google Scholar
Cm 849 (1989), Caring for People: Community care in the next decade and beyond, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Cornwell, J. (1984), Hard Earned Lives, Tavistock, London.Google Scholar
Dant, T. and Gearing, B. (1990), ‘Keyworkers for elderly people in the community: case managers and care co-ordinators’. Journal of Social Policy, 19: 3, 331–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Day, P. R. (1981), Social Work and Social Control, Tavistock, London.Google Scholar
Dean, M. (1991), ‘Seamless service or fragile market?’, Search, 8, 4–6.Google Scholar
Douglas, J. D. (1971), American Social Order: Social rules in a pluralistic society, Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
Evandrou, M. (1987), ‘The use of domiciliary services by the elderly: a survey’, Welfare State Programme Discussion Paper No. 15, London School of Economics, London.Google Scholar
George, V. and Wilding, P. (1984), The Impact of Social Policy, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Goldberg, E. M. and Warburton, R. W. (1979), Ends and Means in Social Work, George Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
Goldberg, E. M. and Connelly, N. (1982), The Effectiveness of Social Care for the Elderly, Heinemann Educational Books, London.Google Scholar
SirGriffiths, R. (1988), Community Care: Agenda for Action, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Hunter, D., McKeganey, N. P. and MacPherson, I. (1988), Care of the Elderly: Policy and Practice, Aberdeen University Press, Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Johnson, M., Gearing, B., Carley, M. and Dant, T. (1988), A Blographically Based Health and Social Diagnostic Technique: A research report, Care for Elderly People at Home, Project Paper 4, Open University, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
Latto, S. M. (1982), ‘Managing the care system’, in Glendinning, F. (ed.). Community Care: Recent research and current projects, Beth Johnson Foundation, Stoke-on-Trent.Google Scholar
Levin, E. et al. (1989), Family Services and Confusion in Old Age, Avebury, Aldershot.Google Scholar
Lipsky, M. (1980), Street Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services, Russell Sage, New York.Google Scholar
Mayer, J. and Timms, N. (1970), The Client Speaks, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
National Institute for Social Work (1988), Residential Care: A Positive Choice (Wagner Report), HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Parker, R. (1981), ‘Tending and social policy’, in Goldberg, E. M. and Hatch, S. (eds.), A New Look at the Personal Social Services, PSI, London.Google Scholar
Qureshi, H. and Walker, A. (1989), The Caring Relationships, Macmillan, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, H. L. (1986), Ethical Dilemmas in Social Work Practice, Routledge and Kegan Paul, Boston, Mass.Google Scholar
Rivlin, A. M. and Wiener, J. M. (1988), Caring for the Disabled Elderly, The Brookings Institution, Washington.Google Scholar
Salvage, A. V. (1986), ‘Attitudes of the over-75s to health and social services’, Research Team for the Care of the Elderly, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff.Google Scholar
Satyamurti, C. (1979: 98) in Parry, N., Rustin, M. and Satyamurti, C., Social Work, Welfare and the State, Edward Arnold, London.Google Scholar
Sinclair, I. et al. (1988), Bridging Two Worlds: Social work and the Elderly Living Alone, Averbury, Aldershot.Google Scholar
Smith, G. (1980), Social Need: Policy practice and research, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Stewart, J. and Walsh, K. (1989), The Search for Quality, Local Government Training Board, London.Google Scholar
Wallace, A. and Rees, S. (1984), ‘The priority of client evaluations’, in Lishman, J. (ed.), Evaluation Research Highlights in Social Work 8, Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London.Google Scholar
Webb, A. and Wistow, G. (1987), Social Work, Social Care and Social Planning: The personal social services since Seebohm, Longman, London.Google Scholar
Willcocks, D., Peace, S. M. and Kellaher, L. (1987), Private Lives in Public Places, Tavistock, London.Google Scholar
Wilson, G. (1987), Money in the Family: Financial organisation and women's responsibility, Averbury, Aldershot.Google Scholar
Wilson, G. (1991), ‘Coping with change in home and neighbourhood’, Housing Studies 6, 4, 263–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, E. (1990), ‘User friendly’. Insight for managers in the community, 6 06, 27–9.Google Scholar