Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T23:09:04.138Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In Defence of Ordinary Help: Estimating the effect of Early Help/Family Support Spending on Children in Need Rates in England using ALT-SR

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2021

CALUM WEBB Open the ORCID record for CALUM WEBB [Opens in a new window]
CALUM WEBB*
Affiliation:
Sheffield Methods Institute, The University of Sheffield, 219 Portobello, Sheffield, UK. S10 2TN email: c.j.webb@sheffield.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Randomised controlled trials are often inappropriate for many forms of preventative children’s services; as such, observational studies using administrative data can be valuable for evidence-based policymaking. However, estimates of effectiveness can be confounded by differences in thresholds of intervention and national policies that exert pressure on local trends. This study adjusted for these factors using methods developed in clinical psychology to control for individual traits and developmental trajectories, Autoregressive Latent Trajectory Models with Structured Residuals, to analyse the relationship between local authority preventative spending and Children in Need (CIN) rates in England. Higher spending was associated with significant decreases in CIN rates between 2010/11 and 2014/15, but not from 2014/15 onwards. In the first half of the decade, 1% increases in expenditure were associated with between 0.07% and 0.157% decreases in CIN rates. Based on average local authority spending cuts, this translates to an additional 13,000 to 16,500 children and young people put or kept at risk of developmental or health impairments nationally for each year between 2011 and 2015. These findings highlight the potential of early help/family support policies and concerns around how their effectiveness has changed consequent to prolonged austerity and a deliberate policy focus on ‘what works’.

Keywords

austeritysocial workchild welfaresocial carestructural equation modellingearly intervention
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 52 , Issue 2 , April 2023 , pp. 396 - 423
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, G. (2011), ‘Early Intervention: The Next Steps ’. London: HM Government.Google Scholar
Allison, P. (2015), ‘Don’t put lagged dependent variables in mixed models’. Statistical Horizons, 2. https://statisticalhorizons.com/lagged-dependent-variables [accessed 18.01.2021]Google Scholar
Allison, P. D., Williams, R. and Moral-Benito, E. (2017), ‘Maximum likelihood for cross-lagged panel models with fixed effects’. Socius, 3, 2378023117710578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axford, N., Sonthalia, S., Wrigley, Z., Goodwin, A., Ohlson, C., Bjornstad, G., Barlow, J., Schrader-McMillan, A., Coad, J., Toft, A. (2015), ‘The Best Start at Home: What works to improve the quality of parent-child interactions from conception to age 5 years? A rapid review of interventions’. London: Early Intervention Foundation.Google Scholar
Bergé, L. (2018), ‘Efficient estimation of maximum likelihood models with multiple fixed-effects: the R package FENmlm’. CREA Discussion Papers.Google Scholar
Berry, D. and Willoughby, M. T. (2017), ‘On the practical interpretability of cross-lagged panel models: Rethinking a developmental workhorse’. Child Development, 88, 4, 1186–1206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broadhurst, K., Wastell, D., White, S., Hall, C., Peckover, S., Thompson, K., Pithouse, A., Davey, D. (2010), ‘Performing ‘Initial Assessment’: Identifying the Latent Conditions for Error at the Front-Door of Local Authority Children’s Services’, The British Journal of Social Work, 40, 2, 352–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979), The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Curran, P. J., Howard, A. L., Bainter, S. A., Lane, S. T. and McGinley, J. S. (2014), ‘The separation of between-person and within-person components of individual change over time: A latent curve model with structured residuals’. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82, 5, 879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagenais, C., Bégin, J., Bouchard, C., Fortin, D. (2004), ‘Impact of intensive family support programs: a synthesis of evaluation studies’. Children and Youth Services Review, 26, 249–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department for Education. (2013, 28 June), ‘Guidance: What Works Network’. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/what-works-network [accessed 18.01.2021]Google Scholar
Department for Education. (2019, Oct 31), ‘Statistics: children in need and child protection’. London: Department for Education. https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/statistics-children-in-need [accessed 18.01.2021]Google Scholar
Department for Education. (2020, Mar 2), ‘Section 251 documents’. London: Department for Education. https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/section251-materials [accessed 2.07.2020]Google Scholar
Devaney, J. (2019), ‘The trouble with thresholds: Rationing as a rational choice in child and family social work’. Child and Family Social Work, 24, 458–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devaney, J., Bunting, L., Davidson, G., Hayes, D., Lazenbatt, A. and Spratt, T. (2012). The impact of early childhood experiences on adolescent suicide and accidental death. Belfast: Northern Ireland Commissioner for Children and Young People.Google Scholar
Duncan, T. E. and Duncan, S. C. (2009), ‘The ABC’s of LGM: An introductory guide to latent variable growth curve modeling’. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 6, 979–991.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunst, C. J., Trivette, C. M., Hamby, D. W. (2007), ‘Meta-analysis of family-centered helpgiving practices research’. Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 13, 4, 370378.Google ScholarPubMed
Early Intervention Foundation (2020, May), ‘Early Intervention Foundation Guidebook’. London: Early Intervention Foundation. https://guidebook.eif.org.uk [accessed 02.07.2020]Google Scholar
Featherstone, B., Gupta, A., Morris, K., White, S. (2019), ‘Protecting Children: A Social Model ’. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Frost, N., Abbott, S. and Race, T. (2015), ‘Family support: Prevention, early intervention and early help ’. John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Grilli, L. and Varriale, R. (2014), ‘Specifying measurement error correlations in latent growth curve models with multiple indicators’. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioural and Social Sciences, 10, 4, 117–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamaker, E. L., Kuiper, R. M. and Grasman, R. P. (2015), ‘A critique of the cross-lagged panel model’. Psychological Methods, 20, 1, 102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayes, D. and Spratt, T. (2012), ‘Child welfare as child protection then and now: What social workers did and continue to do’. British Journal of Social Work, 44, 3, 615–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, R., Goldacre, A., Gorin, S., Bywaters, P. and Webb, C. (2020a), ‘Identifying and understanding the link between system conditions and welfare inequalities in children’s social care services ’. London: Kingston University.Google Scholar
Hood, R., Gorin, S., Goldacre, A., Muleya, W. and Bywaters, P. (2020b), ‘Exploring drivers of demand for child protection services in an English local authority’. Child and Family Social Work.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, L. T. and Bentler, P. M. (1999), ‘Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives’. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchings, J., Griffith, N., Bywater, T. and Williams, M. E. (2017), ‘Evaluating the Incredible Years Toddler Parenting Programme with parents of toddlers in disadvantaged (Flying Start) areas of Wales’. Child: Care, Health and Development, 43, 1, 104–113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Isiordia, M. and Ferrer, E. (2018), ‘Curve of factors model: A latent growth modeling approach for educational research’. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 78, 2, 203–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jack, G. and Gill, O. (2010), ‘The role of communities in safeguarding children and young people’. Child Abuse Review, 19, 82–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. (2014), ‘The story of Baby P: Setting the record straight ’. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. (2018), ‘In whose interest? The privatisation of child protection and social work ’. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, D. A. (2020), Measuring Model Fit. http://davidakenny.net/cm/fit.htm [accessed 11.04.2021]Google Scholar
Lavalette, M. (2019), ‘What is the Future of Social Work?: A handbook for positive action ’. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Layzer, J. I., Goodson, B. D., Bernstein, L., Price, C. (2001), ‘National Evaluation of Family Support Programs. Final Report Volume A: The Meta-Analysis ’. Washington, DC.: Administration for Children, Youth, and Families (DHHS) Google Scholar
Little, T. D., Jorgensen, T. D., Lang, K. M. and Moore, E. W. G. (2014), ‘On the joys of missing data’. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 39, 2, 151–162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacMillan, H.L., Wathen, C.N., Barlow, J., Fergusson, D.M., Leventhal, J.M. and Taussig, H.N. (2009), ‘Interventions to prevent child maltreatment and associated impairment’. The Lancet, 373, 250–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maron, A. (2021), ‘Austerity Beyond Crisis: Economists and the Institution of Austere Social Spending for At-Risk Children in Israel’. Journal of Social Policy, 50, 1, 168–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T. and Grayson, D. (2005), ‘Goodness of fit in structural equation models’. In Maydeu-Olivares, A. and McArdle, J. (eds.), ‘Psychometrics. A festschrift to Roderick P. McDonald ’. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T. and Wen, Z. (2004), ‘In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings’. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 3, 320–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melhuish, E., Belsky, J., Leyland, A. H., Barnes, J. and National Evaluation of Sure Start Research Team. (2008), ‘Effects of fully-established Sure Start Local Programmes on 3-year-old children and their families living in England: a quasiexperimental observational study’. The Lancet, 372, 9650, 1641–1647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government. (2015, Sept 30), ‘English indices of deprivation 2015’. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/english-indices-ofdeprivation-2015 [accessed 18.01.2021]Google Scholar
Mulder, J. D. and Hamaker, E. L. (2020), ‘Three extensions of the random intercept cross-lagged panel model’. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1–11.Google Scholar
Mund, M. and Nestler, S. (2019), ‘Beyond the cross-lagged panel model: Next-generation statistical tools for analyzing interdependencies across the life course’. Advances in Life Course Research, 41, 100249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Audit Office. (2016), ‘Children in need of help or protection ’. London: National Audit Office.Google Scholar
National Audit Office. (2019), ‘Pressures on children’s social care ’. London: National Audit Office.Google Scholar
National Children’s Bureau. (2017, March), ‘No Good Options: Report of the Inquiry into Children’s Social Care in England ’. London: National Children’s Bureau and APPG for Children.Google Scholar
Niemand, T. and Mai, R. (2018), ‘Flexible cutoff values for fit indices in the evaluation of structural equation models’. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46, 6, 1148–1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T. and Muthén, B. O. (2007), ‘Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study’. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14, 4, 535–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ofsted (2016), ‘The report of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills 2016: Social Care ’. Manchester: Ofsted.Google Scholar
R Core Team (2019), ‘R: A language and environment for statistical computing ’. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Rosseel, Y. (2012), ‘lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling’. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 2, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shi, D., Lee, T. and Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2019), ‘Understanding the model size effect on SEM fit indices’. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 79, 2, 310–334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, G., Sylva, K., Smith, T., Sammons, P. and Omonigho, A. (2018), ‘Stop Start: Survival, Decline or Closure? Children’s Centres in England’. London: Sutton Trust.Google Scholar
Stewart-Brown, S. (2012), ‘More thoughts on the RCT question: a rejoinder to Forrester and Ritter’. Journal of Children’s Services. 7, 2, 153–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart-Brown, S., Anthony, R., Wilson, L., Winstanley, S., Stallard, N, Snooks, H. and Simkiss, D. (2011), ‘Should randomised controlled trials be the “gold standard” for research on preventive interventions for children? ’ Journal of Children’s Services, 6, 4, 228–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thoburn, J., Cooper, N., Brandon, M. and Connolly, S. (2013), ‘The place of “think family” approaches in child and family social work: messages from a process evaluation of an English pathfinder service’. Children and Youth Services Review, 35, 2, 228–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wastell, D. and White, S. (2017), ‘Blinded by Science: The Social Implications of Epigenetics and Neuroscience ’. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Webb, C., Bywaters, P., Scourfield, J., McCartan, C., Bunting, L., Davidson, G. and Morris, K. (2020), ‘Untangling child welfare inequalities and the ‘Inverse Intervention Law’ in England’. Children and Youth Services Review, 111, 104849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, C. J. and Bywaters, P. (2018), ‘Austerity, rationing and inequity: trends in children’s and young peoples’ services expenditure in England between 2010 and 2015’. Local Government Studies, 44, 3, 391–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, S., Morris, K., Featherstone, B., Brandon, M. and Thoburn, J. (2014), ‘Reimagining early help: looking forward, looking back’. in Blyth, M. (2014), ‘Moving on from Munro: Improving Children’s Services ’. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
White, S., Wastell, D., Smith, S., Hall, C., Whitaker, E. Debelle, G., Mannion, R. and Waring, J.(2015), ‘Improving practice in safeguarding at the interface between hospital services and children’s social care: a mixed-methods case study’. Health Services and Delivery Research, 3, 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiggan, J. (2018), ‘Policy boostering the social impact investment market in the UK’. Journal of Social Policy, 47, 4, 721–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
YMCA. (2020), ‘Out of Service: A report examining local authority expenditure on youth services in England and Wales’. London: YMCA.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Webb supplementary material

Webb supplementary material 1

Download Webb supplementary material(File)
File 24 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Webb supplementary material

Webb supplementary material 2

Download Webb supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 248.9 KB