Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T10:53:00.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gordon Brown's Misplaced Smithian Appeal: The Eclipse of Sympathy in Changing British Welfare Norms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2009

MATTHEW WATSON
MATTHEW WATSON*
Affiliation:
Department of Politics and International Studies, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL email: matthew.g.watson@warwick.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Gordon Brown has eagerly lauded his fellow Kirkcaldy citizen, Adam Smith, as his main policy inspiration. This article tests the rigour of such a claim by matching Brown's promotion of Smithian ‘sympathy’ as the centrepiece of his programme for government with the changes introduced by his Treasury to the British welfare model. In the 1970s, Thomas Wilson showed that the traditions of the post-war British welfare state were compatible with a modified form of Smithian sympathy socialised at the level of the state. New Labour has set about reforming the welfare model with respect to both its underlying institutions and the basic subjectivities of its recipients. I show that Brown's substantive preference for an asset-based system of welfare moves those subjectivities away from the ‘relational self’ of Smithian sympathy and towards a much more ‘autonomous self’. Consequently, I conclude that it is stretching Smith's concept of sympathy too far, even in a modified socialised form, to associate it with New Labour's asset-based system of welfare.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 38 , Issue 2 , April 2009 , pp. 195 - 210
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balls, E. (2007), ‘The second Saving Gateway pilot’, Speech delivered to the Bristol Institute of Public Affairs, University of Bristol, 25 May.Google Scholar
Boltanski, L. (1999), Distant Suffering: Morality, Media and Politics, translated by Burchell, G., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Braudel, F. (1982), The Wheels of Commerce: Civilization and Capitalism, 15th–18th Century, Volume II, translated by Reynolds, S., London: Collins.Google Scholar
Brown, G. (2000), ‘Civic society in modern Britain’, The 17th Arnold Goodman Lecture, Merchant Taylor's Hall, London, 20 July.Google Scholar
Brown, G. (2002), ‘The strength to make long-term decisions: investing in an enterprising, fairer Britain’, Budget Report, Speech delivered to the House of Commons, 17 April.Google Scholar
Brown, G. (2003a), ‘State and market: Towards a public interest test’, Political Quarterly, 74: 3, 266–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, G. (2003b), Speech delivered to the Social Market Foundation, Cass Business School, London, 3 February.Google Scholar
Brown, G. (2005a), Speech delivered to the Volunteering Conference, HM Treasury, London, 31 January.Google Scholar
Brown, G. (2005b), ‘Politics as a moral duty’, Speech delivered to the Labour Party Conference, Brighton, 26 September.Google Scholar
Brown, G. (2005c), ‘The Hugo Young memorial lecture’, Speech delivered at Chatham House, 13 December.Google Scholar
Brown, G. (2006a), Speech delivered to the Lord Mayor's Banquet, Mansion House, London, 21 June.Google Scholar
Brown, G. (2006b), ‘The Donald Dewar memorial lecture’, Speech delivered at the University of Glasgow, 12 October.Google Scholar
Brown, G. (2007), Speech delivered to the Labour Party Conference, Bournemouth, 24 September.Google Scholar
Coates, D. (2005), Prolonged Labour: The Slow Birth of New Labour Britain, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cronin, J. (2004), New Labour's Pasts: The Labour Party and Its Discontents, Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
DCLG (2008), Communities in Control: Real People, Real Power, London: Department of Communities and Local Government.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Evensky, J. (2005), Adam Smith's Moral Philosophy: A Historical and Contemporary Perspective on Markets, Law, Ethics, and Culture, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finlayson, A. (2008), ‘Characterizing New Labour: the case of the Child Trust Fund’, Public Administration, 86: 1, 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Force, P. (2003), Self-Interest before Adam Smith: A Genealogy of Economic Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Griswold, C. (1999), Adam Smith and the Virtues of Enlightenment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
HM Treasury (2001a), Saving and Assets For All: The Modernisation of Britain's Tax and Benefit System, Number Eight, London: HM Treasury.Google Scholar
HM Treasury (2001b), Myners Review of Institutional Investment in the UK: Final Report, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
HM Treasury (2006), Pre-Budget Report 2006, London: HM Treasury.Google Scholar
HM Treasury/Inland Revenue (2003), Detailed Proposals for the Child Trust Fund, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Langley, P. (2008), The Everyday Life of Global Finance: Saving and Borrowing in Anglo-America, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S. (2007), Best for Britain? The Politics and Legacy of Gordon Brown, Oxford: Oneworld.Google Scholar
McLean, I. (2006), Adam Smith, Radical and Egalitarian: An Interpretation for the 21st Century, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Montes, L. (2004), Adam Smith in Context: A Critical Reassessment of some Central Components of his Thought, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pensions Commission (2005), A New Pension Settlement for the Twenty-First Century: The Second Report of the Pensions Commission, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (1994), Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Raphael, D. D. (2007), The Impartial Spectator: Adam Smith's Moral Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherraden, M. (2005), ‘Assets and public policy’, in Sherraden, M. (ed.), Inclusion in the American Dream: Assets, Poverty, and Public Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, A. (1979), A System of Social Science: Papers Relating to Adam Smith, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Slater, D. and Tonkiss, F. (2001), Market Society: Markets and Modern Social Theory, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1981 [1776]), An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1982 [1759]), The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1982), Lectures on Jurisprudence, Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Toynbee, P. and Walker, D. (2005), Better or Worse? Has Labour Delivered?, paperback edition, London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Verburg, R. (2000), ‘Adam Smith's growing concern on the issue of distributive justice’, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 7: 1, 23–44.Google Scholar
Weinstein, J. R. (2006), ‘Sympathy, difference, and education: social unity in the work of Adam Smith’, Economics and Philosophy, 22: 1, 1–33.Google Scholar
Wilson, T. (1976), ‘Sympathy and self-interest’, in Wilson, T. and Skinner, A. (eds), The Market and the State: Essays in Honour of Adam Smith, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Witzum, A. (1997), ‘Distributive considerations in Smith's conception of economic justice’, Economics and Philosophy, 12: 2, 241–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar