Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-qks25 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T20:14:04.794Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Equality of Treatment for Housewives in Tax and Benefit Systems: A Proposal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Rolande Cuvillier
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is proposed in this article to integrate housewives into tax and benefit systems, in their own right, on the basis of what can be considered as ‘work’ in their case: housekeeping for a husband. The implications as regards the assessment of working time and earnings are examined, as well as the consequences from the point of view of liability to income tax and National Insurance contributions. The basis proposed would serve to recognise personal rights to social benefits to replace rights that are derived from a husband.

The author reviews a number of objections raised by the proposal. She considers that what is at stake is the selective protection of some men's domestic comforts, the status of housekeeping as an occupation and womens' freedom of occupational choice. A section is devoted to family responsibilities because they are often confused with housekeeping. In spite of the weight of habit and vested interest, the author thinks that it is possible to make progress while preserving the individual rights of older generations of women.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 22 , Issue 4 , October 1993 , pp. 439 - 460
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Breeze, E., Trevor, G. and Wilmot, A. (1989), 1989 General Household Survey, Office of Population Censuses and Surveys, Series GHS no. 20, 3.Google Scholar
Cretney, S. (1991), ‘With this pre-marriage contract I thee wed’, The Times, 13 08, 25.Google Scholar
Cuvillier, R. (1977), ‘L'Epouse au foyer: une charge injustiflée pour la collectivité’, Droit social, 12, 427–37.Google Scholar
Cuvillier, R. (1979), ‘The housewife: an unjustified financial burden on the community’, Journal of Social Policy, 8: 1 (01) 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuvillier, R. (1988), Sur la protection sociale de l'épouse non active', Droit social, 6, 531–8.Google Scholar
Cuvillier, R. (1990), ‘L’Activaté ménagère de l'épouse au foyer: base d'obligations et droits propres?, Droit social, 11 (11) 751–6.Google Scholar
Dupeyroux, J.-J., Droit, , de la sécurité sociale, Précis Dalloz, Paris, 11th edn, 164–5.Google Scholar
Elliot, D. M. (1951), ‘The status of domestic work in the United Kingdom, with special reference to the National Institute of Houseworkers’, International Labour Review, 43: 2, 125–48.Google Scholar
Beveridge, W. (1943), ‘Social security plans in Great Britain’, International Labour Review (International Labour Office, Geneva). 47: 1, 46–61.Google Scholar
Johnson, P. and Stark, G. (1979), Taxation and Social Security, 1979–1989: The impact on household incomes, The Institute for Fiscal Studies, London, 7.Google Scholar
King, A. (1991), ‘Togetherness is a contract’, The Times, 8 05, 12.Google Scholar
Kirkby, H. (1991), ‘Housewife, Cinderella or superstar’, The Times, 10 07, 12.Google Scholar
Marcel, A. (1988), ‘Les Droits directs et les droits dérivés dans les régimes de pension’, Revue belge de sécurité sociale (Brussels), 30 (07–08), 769–91.Google Scholar
Oakley, A. (1974), Housewife, Penguin.Google Scholar
Pateman, C. (1988), The Sexual Contract, Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pridham, H. (1989), Tax and Finance for Woman, Allied Dunbar Library, Money Guides, Longman, London.Google Scholar
Reekie, P. D. and Tuddenham, R. (1988), Family Law and Practice, Sweet and Maxwell, London.Google Scholar
Toch, H. (1975), Income Tax, MacDonald and Evans Ltd., London, 18–19.Google Scholar