Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T22:49:18.504Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Doctors' Attitude Towards Current Smokers With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Its Impact on Delivering Smoking Cessation Advice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2012

Laura Winstanley*
Affiliation:
Nottingham University Hospital, United Kingdom. laurawinstanley@nhs.uk
Matthew Daunt
Affiliation:
Derby Royal Infirmary, United Kingdom.
James Macfarlane
Affiliation:
Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
*
*Address for correspondence: Laura Winstanley, 19 Tom Blower Close, Wollaton, Nottingham NG8 1JQ, United Kingdom.

Abstract

Objective: To explore the attitudes of hospital doctors towards current smokers with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Methods: We surveyed 184 hospital doctors of all grades regarding their attitudes to four patient scenarios including: current excess alcohol drinker, current smoker limited by angina, current intravenous drug user and current smoker limited by COPD. Doctors scored to what degree they felt the patients were at fault for their condition and in control of their future health. Results: Most doctors agreed/strongly agreed that current smokers with COPD were the most ‘at fault’ for their condition and when asked to rank the four patients from most to blame to least to blame for their own ill health, 80% doctors ranked smokers with COPD more to blame than smokers with angina. In the last 2 weeks almost all doctors had managed smokers, but only two thirds had offered any form of cessation advice. Comment: A significant proportion of doctors believe that patients with COPD are at fault for their condition; however, they appear to believe there is scope for change in smokers and other addicted patients. By implementing smoking cessation training, doctors can improve the care offered to smokers and avoid the negative attitude towards smokers with COPD.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)