Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T21:21:09.997Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Note on Suetonius, Divus Julius 56, 6

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2012

Extract

‘Epistulae quoque ejus ad senatum extant, quas primum videtur ad paginas et formam memorialis libelli convertisse, cum antea consules et duces non nisi transversa charta scriptas mitterent.’ The form that Caesar used in writing his dispatches to the Senate is still a matter of dispute: the object of this note is to suggest that an old interpretation of this passage, to be found implicit in Lewis and Short's Latin Dictionary, s.v. ‘libellus,’ has more in its favour than recent critics have admitted and to claim for the papyrus codex, or rather for a crude precursor of that form, an antiquity reaching back to the middle of the first century B.C. The sentence in question occurs towards the end of the chapter, after the description of the literary works and before that of the private papers; consequently the position of the sentence does little to support Sir F. G. Kenyon's view that ‘the point of the passage must be that Caesar's dispatches to the Senate were in such a form that they could be enumerated among his literary works.’ The obvious meaning of the passage is that, of the contrasted methods described by ‘transversa charta’ and ‘paginas et formam memorialis libelli,’ Caesar was the first to adopt the latter in official correspondence.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright ©C. H. Roberts 1933. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Quoted in C. Suetoni Tranquilli Divus Julius, ed. Butler, H. E. and Cary, M. (Oxford, 1927), p. 120Google Scholar, from a letter to the editors.

2 Books and Readers in Ancient Greece and Rome (Oxford, 1932), p. 54, note 2.

3 An Introduction to Greek and Latin Palaeography (Oxford, 1912), p. 46, note 3.

4 op. cit. pp. 138–9, abb. 76.

5 Der Brief in der, römischen Literatur (Leipzig, 1901), p. 31. For this reference I am indebted to Mr. T. C Skeat.

6 Rolfe, J. C. (Suetonius, with an English translation, vol. i, London and New York, 1924 [Loeb Classical Library], p. 78)Google Scholar comments—‘Caesar reduced his reports to book form. … His predecessors merely took a sheet, or sheets, and wrote from side to side and from top to bottom, without columns or margins.’ He leaves it an open question whether the book was a roll or a codex.

7 C. Suetoni Tranquilli Divus Julius, ed. Butler, and Cary, , p. 120Google Scholar.

8 vii 53. 3. etc.; xiv, 4.

9 Das Buch bei den Griechen und Römern (Berlin, 1921), p. 185.

10 ibid., p. 114.