Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T11:10:44.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Who's the Fairest of Them All and Does It Really Matter? Positive and Negative Affective Responses to Levels of Relational Equity in Adolescent Relationships

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2016

Terence V. Bowles
Terence V. Bowles*
Affiliation:
Melbourne Graduate School of Education, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE: Terry Bowles, Melbourne Graduate School of Education, 100 Leicester St, University of Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia. Email: tbowles@unimelb.edu.au
Get access

Abstract

The current study investigated how a sample of adolescents perceived the level of equity with friends, teachers, parents, and siblings; and how equity influenced adolescents’ affect. Analysis of responses from 208 Australian secondary students showed that level of perceived equity influenced positive and negative affect. Respondents’ mean scores showed they were more benefitted in their relationships with parents, siblings, friends and least benefitted in relations with teachers. Respondents were most frequently equitable in their relationships with friends. Importantly, consistent with previous research, negative affect was consistently associated with both the underbenefitted and overbenefitted conditions, particularly in relationships with parents and teachers. In conclusion, the findings confirm the initial proposition of equity theory when applied to multiple relationships with adolescents.

Keywords

equitable relationshipspositive affectsnegative affectsadolescent relationships
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Relationships Research , Volume 7 , 2016 , e13
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, J.S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Psychology, 2, 267–299.Google Scholar
Almas, I., Cappelen, A.W., Sørensen, E.Ø., & Tungodden, B. (2010). Fairness and the development of inequality acceptance. Science, 328, 1176–1178. doi:10.1126/science.1187300 Google Scholar
Al-Zawahreh, A., & Al-Madi, F. (2012). The utility of equity theory in enhancing organizational effectiveness. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 46, 158–170.Google Scholar
Allen, J.P., Moore, C., Kuperminc, G., & Bell, K. (1998). Attachment and adolescent psychosocial functioning. Child Development, 69, 1406–1419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Armsden, G., & Greenberg, M.T. (1987). The inventory of parent and peer attachment: relationships to well-being in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16, 427–454. doi:10.1007/BF02202939 Google Scholar
Bakker, A.B., Schaufeli, W.B., Demerouti, E., Janssen, P.P., Van Der Hulst, R., & Brouwer, J. (2000). Using equity theory to examine the difference between burnout and depression. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 13, 247–268. doi:10.1080/10615800008549265 Google Scholar
Bowles, T. (2008a). The relationship of time orientation with perceived academic performance and preparation for assessment in adolescents. Educational Psychology, 28, 551–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowles, T. (2008b). Profiling year level and gender differences in adolescent communication. Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 25, 70–90.Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1995). Developmental ecology through space and time: A future perspective. In Moen, P., Elder, G.H., & Luscher, L. (Eds.), Examining lives in context: Perspectives on the ecology of human development (pp. 619–647). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buunk, B.P., & Van Yperen, N.W. (1991). Referential comparisons, relational comparisons, and exchange orientation: Their relation to marital satisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 709–717. doi:10.1177/0146167291176015 Google Scholar
Canary, D.J., & Stafford, L. (1992). Relational maintenance strategies and equity in marriage. Communication Monographs, 59, 243–267. doi:10.1080/03637759209376268 Google Scholar
Chan, K. (2008). Social comparison of material possessions among adolescents. Qualitative Market Research, 11, 316–330. doi:10.1108/13522750810879039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donoghue, N., & Fallon, B.J. (2003). Gender-role self-stereotyping and the relationship between equity and satisfaction in close relationships. Sex Roles, 48, 217–230. doi:10.1023/A:1022869203900 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fallon, B.J., & Bowles, T. (1999). Adolescent help-seeking for major and minor problems. Australian Journal of Psychology, 51, 12–18. doi:10.1080/00049539908255329 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fallon, B.J., & Bowles, T. (2001). Family functioning and adolescent help-seeking behavior. Family Relations, 50, 239–245. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2001.00239.x Google Scholar
Fehr, E., Bernhard, H., & Rockenbach, B. (2008). Egalitarianism in young children. Nature, 454, 1079–1083. doi:10.1038/nature07155 Google Scholar
Fehr, E., Glatzle-Rutzler, D., & Sutter, M. (2013). The development of egalitarianism, altruism, spite and parochialism in childhood and adolescence. European Economic Review, 64, 369–383. doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2013.09.006 Google Scholar
Floyd, F.J., & Wasner, G.H. (1994). Social exchange, equity, and commitment: Structural equation modeling of dating relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 8, 55–73.Google Scholar
Galinsky, A.M., & Sonenstein, F.L. (2013). Relationship commitment, perceived equity, and sexual enjoyment among young adults in the United States. Archives of Sex Behavior, 42, 93–104. doi:10.1007/s10508-012-0003-y Google Scholar
Guerrero, L.K., La Valley, A.G., & Farinelli, L. (2008). The experience and expression of anger, guilt, and sadness in marriage: An equity theory explanation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 699–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatfield, E., Greenberger, D., Traupmann, J., & Lambert, P. (1982). Equity and sexual satisfaction in recently married couples. Journal of Sex Research, 18, 18–32.Google Scholar
Hatfield, E., & Rapson, R.L. (2011). Equity theory in close relationships. In Van Lange, P.A.M., Kruglanski, A.W., & Higgins, E.T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 200–217). London: Glyph International.Google Scholar
Hatfield, E., & Sprecher, S. (1995). Men's and women's preferences in marital partners in the United States, Russia, and Japan. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 728–750. doi:10.1177/002202219502600613 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatfield, E., Traupmann, J., Sprecher, S., Utne, M., & Hay, J. (1985). Equity and intimate relations: Recent research. In Ickes, W. (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp. 91–117). New York: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegtvedt, K.A. (1990). The effects of relationship structure on emotional reactions to inequity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 53, 214–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hook, J.G., & Cook, T.D. (1979). Equity theory and the cognitive ability of children. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 429–445. doi:10.1037/0033–2909.86.3.429 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jager, J. (2011). Convergence and nonconvergence in the quality of adolescent relationships and its association with adolescent adjustment and young-adult relationship quality. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35, 497–506. doi:10.1177/0165025411422992 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jovanović, V. (2015). Beyond the PANAS: Incremental validity of the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE) in relation to well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 487–491.Google Scholar
Longmore, M.A., & DeMaris, A. (1997). Perceived inequity and depression in intimate relationships: The moderating effect of self-esteem. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 172–184. doi:10.2307/2787103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGillicuddy-De Lisi, A.V., De Lisi, R., & Van Gulik, K. (2008). The effects of grade level, context, and family type on male and female adolescents’ distributive justice reasoning. Journal of Adolescence, 31, 107–124. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.05.003 Google Scholar
Meuwese, R., Crone, E.A., Rooij, M., & Güroğlu, B. (2015). Development of equity preferences in boys and girls across adolescence. Child Development, 86, 145–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Molinari, L., Speltini, G., & Passini, S (2013). Do perceptions of being treated fairly increase students’ outcomes? Teacher–student interactions and classroom justice in Italian adolescents. Educational Research and Evaluation, 19, 58–76. doi:10.1080/13803611.2012.748254.Google Scholar
Mussweiler, T., & Ruter, K. (2003). What friends are for! The use of routine standards in social comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 467–481. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.467 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nunnally, J.C., & Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Panayides, P. (2013). Coefficient alpha: Interpret with caution. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 9, 687–696.Google Scholar
Piko, B.F., Skultéti, D., Luszczynska, A., & Gibbons, F.X. (2010). Social orientations and adolescent health behaviours in Hungary. International Journal of Psychology, 45, 12–20. doi:10.1080/00207590903030279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pritchard, R.D. (1969). Equity theory: A review and critique. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4, 176–211. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(69)90005-1 Google Scholar
Raudino, A., Fergusson, D.M., & Horwood, L.J. (2013). The relationship of parent/child relationships in adolescents is associated with poor adult psychosocial adjustment. Journal of Adolescence, 36, 331.340. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.12.002 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schafer, R.B., Keith, P.M., & Lorenz, F.O. (1984). Equity/inequity and the self-concept: An interactionist analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 47, 42–49.Google Scholar
Sechrist, J., Suitor, J.J., Howard, A.R., & Pillemer, K. (2014). Perceptions of equity, balance of support exchange, and mother–adult child relation. Journal of Marriage & Family, 76, 285–299. doi:10.1111/jomf.12102.Google Scholar
Sprecher, S. (1986). The relation between inequity and emotions in close relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 49. 309–321. doi:10.2307/2786770 Google Scholar
Sprecher, S. (1988). Investment model, equity, and social support determinants of relationship commitment. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 318–328.Google Scholar
Sprecher, S. (1992). How men and women expect to feel and behave in response to inequity in close relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55, 57–69.Google Scholar
Sprecher, S. (1998). Social exchange theories and sexuality. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 32–43.Google Scholar
Sprecher, S. (2001a). A comparison of emotional consequences of and changes in equity over time using global and domain-specific measures of equity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18, 477–501. doi:10.1177/0265407501184003.Google Scholar
Sprecher, S. (2001b). Equity and social exchange in dating couples: Associations with satisfaction, commitment, and stability. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 599–613. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00599.Google Scholar
Steinbeis, N., Bernhardt, B.C., & Singer, T. (2012). Impulse control and underlying functions of the left DLPFC mediate age-related and age-independent individual differences in strategic social behavior. Neuron, 73, 1040–1051. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.12.027 Google Scholar
Traupmann, J., Hatfield, E., & Wexler, P. (1983). Equity and sexual satisfaction in dating couples. British Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 33–40.Google Scholar
Van Yperen, N., & Buunk, B.P. (1990). A longitudinal study of equity and satisfaction in intimate relationships. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 287–309.Google Scholar
Vogl-Bauer, S., Kalbfleisch, P.J., & Beatty, J. (1999). Perceived equity, satisfaction, and relational maintenance strategies in parent–adolescent dyads. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 28, 27–49. doi:10.1023/A:1021668424027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yum, Y.O., & Canary, D.J. (2009). Cultural differences in equity theory predictions of relational maintenance strategies. Human Communication Research, 35, 384–406. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01356.x Google Scholar
Walster, E., Berscheid, E., & Walster, G.W. (1973). New directions in equity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 151–176. doi:10.1037/h0033967 Google Scholar