Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T03:52:23.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does Relationship Satisfaction Always Mean Satisfaction? Development of the Couple Relationship Satisfaction Scale

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2019

Viktorija Cepukiene Open the ORCID record for Viktorija Cepukiene [Opens in a new window]
Viktorija Cepukiene*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Vytautas Magnus University, Kaunas, Lithuania
*
Address for correspondence: Viktorija Cepukiene, Department of Psychology, Vytautas Magnus University, Jonavos st. 66–329, Kaunas LT-44248, Lithuania. Email: viktorija.cepukiene@vdu.lt
Get access

Abstract

This article presents the development of an instrument measuring relationship satisfaction, based on the theory that separates ‘relationship quality’ from ‘satisfaction’ concerning the semantic meaning of the concepts, and to evaluate psychometric properties of the new measure. Two studies were conducted in order to investigate the psychometric properties of the new scale, with 372 and 1,185 participants taking part in Study 1 and Study 2 respectively. Results revealed that the new scale has two-factor structure, adequate internal consistency reliability, and convergent, discriminant and known-groups validity.

Keywords

couplesrelationship satisfactionrelationship qualityscale developmentscale validation
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Relationships Research , Volume 10 , 2019 , e14
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bryant, C.M., Conger, R.D., & Meehan, J.M. (2001). The influence of in-laws on change in marital success. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 614–626.Google Scholar
Canel, A.N. (2013). The development of the marital satisfaction scale (MSS). Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13, 97–117.Google Scholar
Chow, C.M., Buhrmester, D., & Tan, C.C. (2014). Interpersonal coping styles and couple relationship quality: Similarity versus complementarity hypotheses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 175–186.Google Scholar
Decuyper, M., De Bolle, M., & De Fruyt, F. (2012). Personality similarity, perceptual accuracy, and relationship satisfaction in dating and married couples. Personal Relationships, 19, 128–145.Google Scholar
English Oxford dictionary. Retrieved from https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definitionGoogle Scholar
Erol, R.Y., & Orth, U. (2014). Development of self-esteem and relationship satisfaction in couples: Two longitudinal studies. Developmental Psychology, 50, 2291–2303.Google Scholar
Evans, C., Mellor-Clark, J., Margison, F., Barkham, M., Audin, K., Connell, J., & McGrath, G. (2000). CORE: Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation. Journal of Mental Health, 9, 247–255.Google Scholar
Ferreira, L.C., Narciso, I., Novo, R.F., & Pereira, C.R. (2014). Predicting couple satisfaction: the role of differentiation of self, sexual desire and intimacy in heterosexual individuals. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 29, 390–404.Google Scholar
Fincham, F.D., & Rogge, R. (2010). Understanding relationship quality: Theoretical challenges and new tools for assessment. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 2, 227–242.Google Scholar
Finkbeiner, N.M., Epstein, N.B., & Falconier, M.K. (2013). Low intimacy as a mediator between depression and clinic couple relationship satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 20, 406–421.Google Scholar
Fitzsimons, G.M., & Fishbach, A. (2010). Shifting closeness: Interpersonal effects of personal goal progress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 535–49.Google Scholar
Fletcher, G.J. O., Simpson, J.A., & Thomas, G. (2000). The measurement of perceived relationship quality components: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 340–354.Google Scholar
Funk, J.L., & Rogge, R.D. (2007). Testing the ruler with item response theory: Increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 572–583.Google Scholar
Gabb, J., Klett-Davies, M., Fink, J., & Thomae, M. (2013). Enduring love? Couple relationships in the 21st century. Survey Findings. The Open University.Google Scholar
Gere, J., Schimmack, U., Pinkus, R.T., & Lockwood, P. (2011). The effects of romantic partners’ goal congruence on affective well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 549–559.Google Scholar
Goldenberg, H., & Goldenberg, I. (2013). Family therapy (8th ed). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Gottman, J.M. (1993). A theory of marital dissolution and stability. Journal of Family Psychology, 7, 57–75.Google Scholar
Gottman, J.M. (1998). Psychology and the study of marital processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 169–97.Google Scholar
Graham, J.M., Diebels, K.J., & Barnow, Z.B. (2011). The reliability of relationship satisfaction: A reliability generalization meta-analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 25, 39–48.Google Scholar
Graña, J.L., Cuenca, M.L., & Redondo, N. (2017). Relationship satisfaction and interpartner agreement about acts of physical and psychological aggression: a multilevel analysis. BMC Psychiatry, 17, 295.Google Scholar
Hendrick, S.S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 93–98.Google Scholar
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M.R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53–60.Google Scholar
Hu, W., Sze, Y.T., Chen, H., & Fang, X. (2015). Actor–partner analyses of the relationship between family-of-origin triangulation and marital satisfaction in Chinese couples. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24, 2135–2146.Google Scholar
Johnson, M.D., Galovan, A.M., Horne, R.M., Min, J., & Walper, S. (2017). Longitudinal associations between adult children's relations with parents and intimate partners. Journal of Family Psychology, 31, 821–832.Google Scholar
Karakurt, G. (2012). Relationship stability through lenses of complexity. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 40, 126–140.Google Scholar
Karney, B.R., & Bradbury, T.N. (1997). Neuroticism, marital interaction, and the trajectory of marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1075–1092.Google Scholar
Khajehei, M. (2016). Parenting challenges and parents’ intimate relationships. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 26, 447–451.Google Scholar
Khalifian, C.E., & Barry, R.A. (2016). Trust, attachment, and mindfulness influence intimacy and disengagement during newlyweds’ discussions of relationship transgressions. Journal of Family Psychology, 30, 592–601.Google Scholar
Kito, M. (2016). Shared and unique prototype features of relationship quality concepts. Personal Relationships, 23, 759–786.Google Scholar
Kaiser, H.F., & Rice, J. (1974). Little Jiffy, Mark IV. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 111–117.Google Scholar
Klein, W., Izquierdo, C., & Bradbury, T.N. (2007). Psychology working relationships: Communicative patterns and strategies among couples in everyday life. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 4, 1–38.Google Scholar
Li, T., & Fung, H.H. (2011). The dynamic goal theory of marital satisfaction. Review of General Psychology, 15, 246–254.Google Scholar
Locke, H.J., & Wallace, K.M. (1959). Short marital adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity. Marriage and Family Living, 21, 251–255.Google Scholar
Mattson, R.E., Rogge, R.D., Johnson, M.D., Davidson, E.K. B., & Fincham, F.D. (2013). The positive and negative semantic dimensions of relationship satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 20, 328–355.Google Scholar
Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurusGoogle Scholar
Miller, R.B., Yorgason, J.B., Sandberg, J.G., & White, M.B. (2003). Problems that couples bring to therapy: A view across the family life cycle. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 31, 395–407.Google Scholar
Miller, S.D., Duncan, B.L., Brown, J., Sorrel, R., & Chalk, B. (2006). Using outcome to inform and improve treatment outcomes. Journal of Brief Therapy, 5, 5–22.Google Scholar
Norton, R. (1983). Measuring marital quality: A critical look at the dependent variable. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 141–151.Google Scholar
Novak, J.R., Sandberg, J.G., & Davis, S.Y. (2017). The role of attachment behaviors in the link between relationship satisfaction and depression in clinical couples: implications for clinical practice. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 43, 352–363.Google Scholar
Ogletree, S.M., & Worthen, J.B. (2008). Housecleaning attitudes and intimate relationships. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 7, 136–149.Google Scholar
Prentice, C.M. (2005). The assimilation of in-laws: The impact of newcomers on the structuration of families (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Missouri, Columbia, MO.Google Scholar
Preston, C.C., & Colman, A.M. (2000). Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: Reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychologica, 104, 1–15.Google Scholar
Raffagnino, R., & Matera, C. (2015). Assessing relationship satisfaction: Development and validation of the dyadic-familial relationship satisfaction scale. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 14, 322–341.Google Scholar
Rempel, J.K., Ross, M., & Holmes, J.G. (2001). Trust and communicated attributions in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 57–54.Google Scholar
Røsand, G.B., Slinning, K., Eberhard-Gran, M., Røysamb, E., & Tambs, K. (2012). The buffering effect of relationship satisfaction on emotional distress in couples. BMC Public Health, 12, 1–13.Google Scholar
Røysamb, E., Vittersø, J., & Tambs, K. (2014). The relationship satisfaction scale — Psychometric properties. Norsk Epidemiologi, 24, 187–194.Google Scholar
Sandberg, J.G., Bradford, A.B., & Brown, A.P. (2017). Differentiating between attachment styles and behaviors and their association with marital quality. Family Process, 56, 518–531.Google Scholar
Schumm, W.R., Nichols, C.W., Schectman, K.L., & Grinsby, C.C. (1983). Characteristics of responses to the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale by a sample of 84 married mothers. Psychological Reports, 53, 567–572.Google Scholar
Skowron, E.A., & Friedlander, M.L. (1998). The Differentiation of Self Inventory: Development and initial validation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45, 1–11.Google Scholar
Snyder, D.K., & Halford, W.K. (2012). Evidence-based couple therapy: Current status and future directions. Journal of Family Therapy, 34, 229–249.Google Scholar
Sommer, J., Babcock, J., & Sharp, C. (2017). A dyadic analysis of partner violence and adult attachment. Journal of Family Violence, 32, 279–290.Google Scholar
Spanier, G.B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and Family, 38, 15–28.Google Scholar
Urbano-Contreras, A., Iglesias-García, M.-T., & Martínez-González, R.-A. (2017). Development and validation of the Satisfaction in Couple Relationship Scale (SCR). Contemporary Family Therapy, 39, 54–61.Google Scholar
Vandenberg, R.J., & Lance, C.E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–69.Google Scholar
Vowels, L.M., & Mark, K.P. (2018). Relationship and sexual satisfaction: A longitudinal actor–partner interdependence model approach. Sexual and Relationship Therapy. doi:10.1080/14681994.2018.1441991Google Scholar
Weigel, D.J., Lalasz, C.B., & Weiser, D.A. (2016). Maintaining relationships: The role of implicit relationship theories and partner fit. Communication Reports, 29, 23–34.Google Scholar
Wiebe, S.A., Johnson, S.-M., Lafontaine, M., Moser, M.B., Dalgleish, T.L., & Tasca, G.A. (2017). Two-year follow-up outcomes in emotionally focused couple therapy: An investigation of relationship satisfaction and attachment trajectories. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 43, 227–244.Google Scholar
Wiebe, S.A., Johnson, S.M., Moser, M.B., Dalgleish, T.L., & Tasca, G.A. (2016). Predicting follow-up outcomes in emotionally focused couple therapy: The role of change in trust, relationship-specific attachment, and emotional engagement. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 43, 213–226.Google Scholar
Zemp, M., Nussbeck, F.W., Cummings, E.M., & Bodenmann, G. (2017) The spillover of child-related stress into parents’ relationship mediated by couple communication. Family Relations, 66, 317–330.Google Scholar