Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T12:49:46.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Radiographers’ perception on the provision of psychosocial support for cancer patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2022

Jade Azzopardi
Affiliation:
Department of Radiography, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malta, Msida, MSD 2080, Malta
Susan Mercieca
Affiliation:
Department of Radiography, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malta, Msida, MSD 2080, Malta
Jonathan Loui Portelli*
Affiliation:
Department of Radiography, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malta, Msida, MSD 2080, Malta
*
Author for correspondence: Dr Jonathan L Portelli, Department of Radiography, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malta, Msida, MSD 2080, Malta. E-mail: jonathan.portelli@um.edu.mt

Abstract

Introduction:

Therapeutic radiographers are the first point of contact for cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy treatment and therefore have an important role in providing both physical and psychosocial support to these patients. This study aimed to evaluate therapeutic radiographers’ perception about their role in identifying and providing psychosocial support for patients receiving RT treatment.

Method:

The study used a cross-sectional, prospective research design. A self-designed questionnaire was distributed to all therapeutic radiographers (n = 26) working at a radiotherapy department in Malta.

Results:

A total of 21 therapeutic radiographers completed the questionnaire. All participants felt that the provision of psychological care was an important part of their role as therapeutic radiographers. The majority of the participants reported having the most confidence in giving treatment-related symptoms advice rather than psychological support. The most common barrier to providing psychological support was lack of training (95·2%), followed by the lack of an appropriate screening tool (85·7%), availability of private space to talk to patients (76·2%) and a lack of knowledge (61·9%).

Conclusion:

While most therapeutic radiographers believed that providing psychosocial support was an important aspect of their role, several barriers prevented them from fulfilling this role. Training, the introduction of a psychosocial screening tool and clear referral processes are recommended to improve radiotherapy service.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ng, R, Verkooijen, H M, Ooi, L L, Koh, W-P. Unmet psychosocial needs among cancer patients undergoing ambulatory care in Singapore. Support Care Cancer 2012; 20 (5): 10491056.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mackenzie, L J, Sanson-Fisher, R W, Carey, M L, D’Este, C A. Radiation oncology outpatient perceptions of patient-centred care: a cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open 2013; 3 (2): e001265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chou, Y-H, Chia-Rong, H V, Chen, X, Huang, T-Y, Shieh, S-H. Unmet supportive care needs of survival patients with breast cancer in different cancer stages and treatment phases. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 59 (2): 231236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Habboush, Y, Shannon, R P, Niazi, S K et al. Patient-reported distress and survival among patients receiving definitive radiation therapy. Adv Radiat Oncol 2017; 2 (2): 211219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, J, Slade, A N, McDonagh, P R, Burton, W, Fields, E C. The long-lasting relationship of distress on radiation oncology-specific clinical outcomes. Adv Radiat Oncol 2018; 4 (2): 354361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlson, L E, Bultz, BD. Benefits of psychosocial oncology care: improved quality of life and medical cost offset. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003; 1 (1): 8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Council for the Professions Complementary to Medicine Malta. Code of practice – radiography. 2006. https://deputyprimeminister.gov.mt/en/regcounc/cpcm/documents/copradiography.pdf. Accessed on 15th December 2020.Google Scholar
European Federation of Therapeutic Radiographer Societies. European qualifications framework (EQF) level 6 benchmarking document: therapeutic radiographers (2nd ed.). 2018. fromhttps://www.radiologietechnologen.at/fileadmin/content/Netzwerk/EFRS/EFRS_EQF_level_6_Benchmark_Web_version.pdf. Accessed on 15th December 2020.Google Scholar
ESTRO Radiation TherapisT Committee. The European society of radiotherapy and oncology (ESTRO) European higher education area levels 7 and 8 postgraduate benchmarking document for radiation TherapisTs (RTTs). Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2018; 8: 2240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikkelsen, T H, Søndergaard, J, Jensen, A B, Olesen, F. Cancer rehabilitation: psychosocial rehabilitation needs after discharge from hospital? A qualitative interview study. Scand J Prim Health Care 2008; 26 (4): 216221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsner, K, Naehrig, D, Halkett, G K B, Dhillon, H M. Reduced patient anxiety as a result of radiation therapist-led psychosocial support: a systematic review. J Med Radiat Sci 2017; 64 (3): 220231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elsner, K L, Naehrig, D, Halkett, G K B, Dhillon, H M. Development and pilot of an international survey: ‘radiation therapists and psychosocial support’. J Med Radiat Sci 2018; 65 (3): 209217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maamoun, J, Fitch, M, Barker, R et al. Results of a radiation therapist opinion survey identifying, measuring and addressing radiation therapy patient supportive care needs. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2009; 40 (1): 2431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lavergne, C, Taylor, A, Gillies, C, Barisic, V. Understanding and addressing the informational needs of radiation therapists concerning the management of anxiety and depression in patients receiving radiation therapy treatment. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2015; 46 (1): 3036.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yusoff, M S B. ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. EIMJ 2019; 11 (2): 4954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mihailescu, M. Content analysis. ResearchGate. 2021. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333756046_Content_analysis. Accessed on 26th February 2021.Google Scholar
Moore, P M, Rivera Mercado, S, Grez Artigues, M, Lawrie, T A. Communication skills training for healthcare professionals working with people who have cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 2013 (3): CD003751.Google ScholarPubMed
Oultram, S, Findlay, N, Clover, K, Cross, L, Ponman, L, Adams, C. A comparison between patient self-report and radiation therapists’ ability to identify anxiety and distress in head and neck cancer patients requiring immobilization for radiation therapy. J Radiother Pract 2012; 11 (2): 7482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botti, M, Endacott, R, Watts, R, Cairns, J, Lewis, K, Kenny, A. Barriers in providing psychosocial support for patients with cancer. Cancer Nurs 2006; 29 (4): 309316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merchant, S, O’Connor, M, Halkett, G. Time, space and technology in radiotherapy departments: how do these factors impact on patients’ experiences of radiotherapy? Eur J Cancer Care 2017; 26 (2): e12354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, C S, Chan, S W-C, Chan, M F, Yap, S F, Wang, W, Kowitlawakul, Y. Nurses’ perceptions of psychosocial care and barriers to its provision: a qualitative study. J Nurs Res 2017; 25 (6): 411418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larsen, T, Fineberg, H, Rinaldo, A, Menon, T, Jones, G. Perceptions of radiation therapists about providing psychosocial and supportive care to patients at peel regional cancer center. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2015; 46 (1): 3744.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bolderston, A, Lewis, D, Chai, M. The concept of caring: perceptions of radiation therapists. Radiography 2010; 16: 198208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halkett, G K B, Kristjanson, L J. Patients’ perspectives on the role of radiation therapists. Patient Educ Couns 2007; 69 (1–3): 7683.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: PDF

Azzopardi et al. supplementary material

Azzopardi et al. supplementary material 1

Download Azzopardi et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 656.6 KB
Supplementary material: File

Azzopardi et al. supplementary material

Azzopardi et al. supplementary material 2

Download Azzopardi et al. supplementary material(File)
File 224.3 KB