Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T13:30:59.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors associated with late presentation of cancer: a limited literature review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2010

A. Almuammar ,
C. Dryden  and
J.A. Burr
A. Almuammar*
Affiliation:
School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
C. Dryden
Affiliation:
School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
J.A. Burr
Affiliation:
School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
*
Correspondence to: A. Almuammar, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK. E-mail: cmp07aa@sheffield.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

According to the World Health Organization (WHO 2006), cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Deaths from cancer are projected to continue rising, with an estimated 9 million people dying from cancer in 2015 and 11.4 million dying in 2030 (WHO 2006). Delayed presentation or late diagnosis of cancer is associated with low survival. The aim of this review is to identify factors associated with delayed presentation of cancer that were reported by previous studies. Published studies which identified the most common factors attributed to the late presentation of cancer were reviewed. Publications were identified using MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online), the Cochrane Library, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) and EMBASE (Excerpta Medica Database) databases. A Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) was used to assess the methodological quality of the studies. A total of 24 studies met the inclusion criteria. A data extraction sheet was used to systematically record relevant factors. Twenty-four studies met the inclusion criteria which identified factors associated with patients’ delay including patients’ knowledge, stress and fear, and nature of the disease. Other factors were attributed to health providers such as general practitioner (GP) experience, referral delay, and a younger age group being considered as low risk, so symptoms were missed.

Keywords

Cancerdelaydiagnosislate presentationpatientstime factortreatment
Type
Literature Review
Information
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , June 2010 , pp. 117 - 123
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.de Nooijer, J, Lechner, L, de Vries, H. A qualitative study on detecting cancer symptoms and seeking medical help; an application of Andersen’s model of total patient delay. Patient Educ Couns 2001; 42: 145–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Montazeri, A, Ebrahimi, M, Mehrdad, N, Ansari, M, Sajadian, A. Delayed presentation in breast cancer: a study in Iranian women. BMC Womens Health 2003; 3:4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Tromp, DM, Brouha, XD, Hordijk, GJ, Winnubst, JA, de Leeuw, JR. Patient factors associated with delay in primary care among patients with head and neck carcinoma: a case-series analysis. Fam Pract 2005; 22: 554–559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Llewellyn, CD, Johnson, NW, Warnakulasuriya, S. Factors associated with delay in presentation among younger patients with oral cancer. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004; 97: 707–713.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Cockburn, J, Paul, C, Tzelepis, F, McElduff, P, Byles, J. Delay in seeking advice for symptoms that potentially indicate bowel cancer. Am J Health Behav 2003; 27: 401–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Andersen, BL, Cacioppo, JT. Delay in seeking a cancer diagnosis: delay stages and psychophysiological comparison processes. Br J Soc Psychol 1995; 34(Pt 1): 33–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Arndt, V, Stürmer, T, Stegmaier, CZiegler, HBecker, A & Brenner, H. Provider delay among patients with breast cancer in Germany: A population-based study. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2003, 21(8): 1440–1446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Burgess, C, Hunter, MS, Ramirez, AJ. A qualitative study of delay among women reporting symptoms of breast cancer. Br J Gen Pract 2001; 51: 967–971.Google ScholarPubMed
9.Kirwan, JM, Tincello, DG, Herod, JJ, Frost, O, Kingston, RE. Effect of delays in primary care referral on survival of women with epithelial ovarian cancer: Retrospective audit. BMJ 2002; 324: 148–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Tessaro, I, Eng, E, Smith, J. Breast cancer screening in older African-American women: qualitative research findings. Am J Health Promot 1994; 8: 286–292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Corner, J, Hopkinson, J, Roffe, L. Experience of health changes and reasons for delay in seeking care: a UK study of the months prior to the diagnosis of lung cancer. Soc Sci Med 2006; 62: 1381–1391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Evans, J, Ziebland, S, McPherson, A. Minimizing delays in ovarian cancer diagnosis: an expansion of Andersen’s model of ‘total patient delay’. Fam Pract 2007; 24: 48–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Amir, Z, Kwan, SY, Landes, D, Feber, T, Williams, SA. Diagnostic delays in head and neck cancers. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 1999; 8: 198–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Mor, V, Masterson-Allen, S, Goldberg, R, Guadagnoli, E, Wool, MS. Pre-diagnostic symptom recognition and help seeking among cancer patients. J Community Health 1990; 15: 253–266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Lannin, DR, Mathews, HF, Mitchell, J, Swanson, MS, Swanson, FH, Edwards, MS. Influence of socioeconomic and cultural factors on racial differences in late-stage presentation of breast cancer. JAMA 1998; 279: 1801–1807.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Baumann, LC, Han, Y, Love, RR. Beliefs about breast cancer and care seeking in Vietnam. Clin Excell Nurse Pract 1997; 1: 301–311.Google Scholar
17.Facione, NC. Delay versus help seeking for breast cancer symptoms: a critical review of the literature on patient and provider delay. Soc Sci Med 1993; 36: 1521–1534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Bain, NS, Campbell, NC, Ritchie, LD, Cassidy, J. Striking the right balance in colorectal cancer care—a qualitative study of rural and urban patients. Fam Pract 2002; 19: 369–374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Esteva, M, Ramos, M, Cabeza, E, Llobera, J, Ruiz, A, Pita, S, Segura, JM, Cortes, JM, Gonzalez-Lujan, L; DECCIRE research group. Factors influencing delay in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a study protocol. BMC Cancer 2007; 7:86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Howell, DA, Smith, AG, Roman, E. Lymphoma: variations in time to diagnosis and treatment. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2006; 15: 272–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Miedema, BB, Easley, J, Hamilton, R. Young adults’ experiences with cancer: comments from patients and survivors. Can Fam Physician 2006; 52: 1446–1447.Google ScholarPubMed
22.Thorne, AL, Mercer, SJ, Harris, GJ, Simson, JN. Reduction in late diagnosis of colorectal cancer following introduction of a specialist colorectal surgery service. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2006; 88: 562–565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed