^1. Johnson, Lyndon, “To Fulfill These Rights,” in The Moynihan Report and the Politics of Controversy, ed. Rainwater, Lee and Yancey, William L. (Cambridge, Mass., 1967), 425–32.Google Scholar

^2. See Steinfels, Peter, The Neoconservatives: The Men Who Are Changing America's Politics (New York, 1979), 50, 126Google Scholar; Lemann, Nicholas, The Promised Land: The Great Black Migration and How It Changed America (New York, 1991)Google Scholar; and Edsall, Thomas Byrne and Edsall, Mary D., Chain Reaction (New York, 1992), 54Google Scholar. The Edsalls view Moynihan as calling for jobs, but they make no mention of welfare reform. Matusow, Allen J., The Unraveling of America: A History of Liberalism in the 1960s (New York, 1984), 195.Google Scholar

^3. Rainwater, and Yancy, eds., The Moynihan Report, x, 7.

^4. Yarmolinsky, Adam, “How Good Was the Answer? How Good Was the Question?” in Controversies and Decisions: The Social Sciences and Public Policy, ed. Frankel, Charles (New York, 1976), 262Google Scholar. Lawrence M. Mead has also held that to mention the family issue was to “strike a nerve.” See The New Politics of Poverty (New York, 1992), 234Google Scholar. While he emphasizes the role of the riots in shaping policy decisions, Charles Murray does not mention the influence of Watts on the reception of the Moynihan Report. See Losing Ground: American Social Policy, 1950–1980 (New York, 1984), 30, 129–30.Google Scholar

^5. Matusow, Unraveling of America, 196–97. Nicholas Lemann gives virtually no attention to the attitudes of black leaders before the riot, and he emphasizes the response of younger black intellectuals afterward. See Lemann, Promised Land, 176–77.

^6. Ibid., 59–72. Like Moynihan, Frazier is more often denounced than read. For a similar reading of Frazier's work as emphasizing the temporary nature of disorganization, see Jackson, Walter, Gunnar Myrdal and America's Conscience (Chapel Hill, 1990), 303Google Scholar; and Wilson, William J., “A New Urban Poverty and the Problem of Race,” Michigan Quarterly Review (Spring 1994): 248.Google Scholar

^7. Johnson, Charles S., Growing Up in the Block Belt (Washington, D.C., 1941)Google Scholar; Frazier, E. Franklin, Negro Youth at the Crossways (Washington, D.C., 1940)Google Scholar; Warner, W. L., Junker, Buford H., and Adams, Walter A., Color and Human Nature: Negro Personality Development in a Northern City (Washington, D.C., 1941);Google Scholar and Davis, Allison and Dollard, John, Children of Bondage (Washington, D.C., 1940)Google Scholar. For a discussion of the shift on self-hate findings, see Cross, William E. Jr., Shades of Black: Diversity in African-American Identity (Philadelphia, 1991), 20–22.Google Scholar

^8. Scott, , “The Damaged Black Psyche: The Liberal Creation and Use of a Social Science Imagery, 1890–1970” (Ph.D. diss., Stanford University, 1994), 24–56.Google Scholar

^9. Scott, “Damaged Black Psyche,” 86–87. For Myrdal's discussion of black social and family pathology, see Myrdal, Gunnar, An American Dilemma (New York, 1944), 927–35Google Scholar. For the most authoritative study of Gunnar Myrdal and An American Dilemma, see Jackson, Gunnar Myrdal.

^10. Ginsberg, Sol W., “Mental Health: Theoretical Assumptions,” in Ginsburg, Sol W., A Psychiatrist's Views on Social Issues (New York, 1963), 5.Google Scholar

^11. Gerald N. Grob, “Psychiatry and Social Activism: The Politics of a Speciality in Postwar America,” Bulletin of the History of Medicine (Winter 1986): 477–501.

^12. Felix, Robert H., Mental Illness: Progress and Prospects (New York, 1967), 56–57.Google Scholar

^13. McClay, Wilfred M., The Masterless: Self and Society in Modem America (Chapel Hill, 1994), 226–68.Google Scholar

^14. Grob, Gerald N., Mental Illness and American Society, 1875–1940 (Princeton, 1983), 318.Google Scholar

^15. Kardiner, Abram and Ovesey, Lionel, The Mark of Oppression: Explorations in the Personality of the American Negro (Cleveland, 1962).Google Scholar

^16. Frazier, E. Franklin, “Problems and Needs of Negro Children and Youth Resulting from Family Disorganization,” in Frazier on Race Relations, edited with an introduction by Edwards, G. Franklin (Chicago, 1968).Google Scholar

^17. Scott, “Damaged Black Psyche,” 204–41.

^18. Ibid.

^19. For examples, see Passaw, Harry, Education in Depressed Areas (New York, 1963)Google Scholar; and Frost, Joe L. and Hawkes, Glenn R., The Disadvantaged Child: Issues and Innovations (Boston, 1966)Google Scholar. For an extremely useful discussion, see Gilbert, James, Cycles of Outrage (New York, 1986).Google Scholar

^20. Not all social scientists were structuralists. A notable exception to this generalization was Walter B. Miller, a social scientist who studied delinquency. Unlike the structuralists, Miller believed the culture of the poor led them to delinquency and unemployment. Unlike the structuralists, whom he opposed, he also doubted the ability of the government to end poverty. Unlike the pathologists, he forthrightly rejected the notion that the poor had a pathological culture or personalities. See Miller, Walter A., “The Elimination of the American Lower Class as a National Policy: A Critique of the Ideology of the Poverty Movement of the 1960s,” in On Understanding Poverty (New York, 1968), ed. Moynihan, Daniel P., 260–315.Google Scholar

^21. Cloward, Richard A. and Ohlin, Lloyd E., Delinquency and Opportunity: A Theory of Delinquent Gangs (New York, 1960).Google Scholar

^22. Marris, Peter and Rein, Martin, Dilemmas of Social Reform: Poverty and Community Action in the United States (London, 1967), 39–40, 45–50.Google Scholar

^23. Ibid., xxx.

^24. Lewis, Oscar, The Children of Sanchez (New York, 1961), xxv.Google Scholar

^25. Liebow, Elliot, Tally's Comer: A Study of Negro Streetcorner Men (Boston, 1967).Google Scholar

^26. Herzog, Elizabeth, “Some Assumptions About the Poor,” Social Service Review 37 (December 1963): 389–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Herzog, Elizabeth, “Unmarried Mothers: Some Questions to Be Answered and Some Answers to Be Questioned,” Child Welfare 41 (October 1962): 339–50.Google Scholar

^27. Herzog, “Unmarried Mothers,” 359. See also Vincent, Clark E., Unmarried Mothers (New York, 1961).Google Scholar

^28. Rodman, Hyman, “The Lower Classes and the Negroes: Implications for Intellectuals,” in New Perspectives on Poverty, ed. Shostak, Arthur B. and Gomberg, William (Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1965), 172.Google Scholar

^29. Schorr, Alvin L., “The Nonculture of Poverty,” Journal of Orthopsychiatry 34 (October 1964): 907–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^30. Riessman, Frank and Miller, S. M., “Social Change Versus the ‘Psychiatric World View,’” Journal of Orthopsychiatry 34 (January 1964): 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^31. Riessman, Frank, Cohen, Jerome, and Pearl, Arthur, eds., Introduction, Mental Health of the Poor (New York, 1964), 15Google Scholar. Writing with S. M. Miller, Riessman also put forth a defense of working-class culture, a group often defined as lower class. See Miller, S. M. and Riessman, Frank, “The Working-Class Subculture: A New View,” Social Problems 9 (Summer 1961): 86–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^32. Riessman, Frank, The Culturally Deprived Child (New York, 1962)Google Scholar. For identification of Riessman as a pathologist, see Ellison, Ralph, “What These Children Are Like,” in Going to the Territory (New York, 1986), 68Google Scholar. Castro, Janet, “Untapped Verbal Fluency of Black Schoolchildren,” in The Culture of Poverty: A Critique, ed. Leakcock, Eleanor Burke (New York, 1971), 82.Google Scholar

^33. Riessman, Frank, “The Strengths of the Poor,” in New Perspectives on Poverty, ed. Shostak, Arthur B. and Gomberg, William (Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1965), 41Google Scholar. See also S. M. Miller, “The American Lower Classes: A Typological Approach,” in New Perspectives on Poverty, 37–39.

^34. S. M. Miller, “The American Lower Classes: A Typological Approach,” in New Perspectives on Poverty, 37–39.

^35. Glazer, Nathan, Introduction, in Elkins, Stanley, Slavery: A Problem in American Institutional and Intellectual Life (New York, 1959), xviGoogle Scholar. For an example of a work about the lower class that was primarily a study of poor blacks, see “The Disadvantaged Child and the Learning Process,” in Passaw, Education in Depressed Areas, 163–77.

^36. Clark, Kenneth, Dark Ghetto: Dilemmas of Social Power (New York, 1967).Google Scholar

^37. Steinfels, The Neoconservatives, 50, 126.

^38. For the white South's use of damage imagery, see Carter, Hodding, “Desegregation Does Not Mean Integration,” in Integration Vs Segregation, ed. Humphrey, Hubert H. (New York, 1964), 137–38Google Scholar; Berlin, I. N., “Desegregation Creates Problems, Too,” in School Desegregation: Documents and Commentaries, ed. Humphrey, Hubert H. (New York, 1964), 231Google Scholar; Record on Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia (Savannah Division) to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, Stell v. Savannah Chatham County Board of Education, Civil Action No. 1316, Pleas and Answer of Intervenors. Newby, I. A., Challenge to the Court: Social Scientists and the Defense of Segregation, 1954–1966 (Baton Rouge, 1967), 199Google Scholar. In response, the Harvard psychologist Robert Coles stressed the resilence of children. Robert Coles, “The Desegregation of Southern Schools: A Psychiatric Study,” in Humphrey, Integration Vs Segregation, 206–7.

^39. Educational Policies Commission, National Education Association, Education and the Disadvantaged American (Washington, D.C., 1962), 28–29.Google Scholar

^40. Conant, James B., Slums and Suburbs: A Commentary on Schools in Metropolitan Areas (New York, 1961), 23.Google Scholar

^41. Glazer, Nathan, “Is ‘Integration’ Possible in the New York School?” Commentary (September 1960): 187, 190.Google Scholar

^42. Hoffer, Eric, “The Negro Is Prejudiced Against Himself,” U.S. News and World Report, 28 December 1964: 48Google Scholar. See also New York Magazine, 29 November 1964.

^43. Bell, Daniel, “Plea for a ‘New Phase’ in Negro Leadership,” New York Times Magazine, 31 May 1964Google Scholar. Quoted in Lewis, Anthony, Portrait of Decade: The Second American Revolution (New York, 1964), 275.Google Scholar

^44. White, Theodore H., The Making of the President 1964 (New York, 1965), 231Google Scholar. See also White, Theodore H., “Backlash,” Life, 16 October 1957, 111.Google Scholar

^45. Education and the Disadvantaged, 35.

^45. Lomax, Louis, The Negro Revolt (New York, 1962), 211–12.Google Scholar

^47. Young, Whitney M. Jr., To Be Equal (New York, 1966), 16.Google Scholar

^48. Whitney M. Young Jr., “Agenda for the Future,” Address delivered before the Urban League, 1 August 1965. Williams, Jayme Coleman and Williams, McDonald, The Negro Speaks: The Rhetoric of Contemporary Block Leaders (New York, 1970), 185–86.Google Scholar

^49. “Interviews: What Negroes in the North Are Really After,” U.S. News and World Report, 10 June 1963, 40.

^50. Graham, Hugh Davis, The Civil Rights Era: Origins and Development of National Policy, 1960–1972 (New York, 1990), 105.Google Scholar

^51. See James Farmer, Freedom—When?, with an Introduction by Cohen, Jacob (New York, 1965), 124Google Scholar; and Farmer, James, “We Cannot Afford to Fail,” New York Times Magazine, 29 September 1963, 31Google Scholar. See also “Crashing Gates to Better Jobs,” Business Week, 22 June 1963, 24–25.

^52. Bayard Rustin, “Why Don't Negroes …” in The Moynihan Report, ed. Rainwater and Yancey, 423.

^53. Hentoff, Nat, The New Equality (New York, 1964), 97.Google Scholar

^54. Silberman, Charles E., Crisis in Block and White (New York, 1964), 231.Google Scholar

^55. Ibid., 235.

^56. Moynihan, Daniel P., “The President and the Negro: The Moment Lost,” Commentary 43 (February 1967): 35.Google Scholar

^57. Moynihan, Daniel Patrick, The Negro Family: The Case for National Action (Washington, D.C., 1965), 15–29Google Scholar, in Moynihan Report, ed. Rainwater and Yancey.

^58. Moynihan, The Negro Family, Introduction, 43.

^59. Moyihan, The Negro Family, 47–48.

^60. Ibid., 62.

^61. Ibid., 64.

^62. Ibid. 16.

^63. Moynihan, Daniel Patrick, “Poverty and Progress,” American Scholar 33 (Autumn 1964): 596.Google Scholar

^64. Moynihan, Daniel P., “The Case for a Family Policy,” in Coping: Essays on the Practice of Government (New York, 1973), 71Google Scholar; and Moynihan, “The President and the Negro,” 36.

^65. Two years after the controversy, Moynihan stated that the report first contained a list of policy recommendations, which included full employment, birth control, adoption, and a family allowance to replace Aid to Families with Dependent Children. The former would have given aid to all families; the latter gave assistance only to single-parent families. See Moynihan, “The President and the Negro,” 36.

^66. Rainwater and Yancey, Moynihan Report, 147.

^67. Moynihan, The Negro Family, 86–89.

^68. Glazer, Nathan, Foreword to The Negro Family in the United States by Frazier, E. Franklin (Chicago, 1966), xviiGoogle Scholar. While he would become the darling of the right, Moynihan embraced ideas antithetical to conservatism. In recounting the political developments after Watts, Moynihan affirmed the conservative pundits Rowland Evans's and Robert Novak's belief that the report envisioned more than equality of opportunity. In Moynihan's words: “The report, said they, had raised, as indeed it had, the explosive question of preferential treatment.” In an article warning against extreme race consciousness that would lead to racial quotas, Moynihan defended the basic premise of affirmative action. He held that prudence dictated “recognizing our potential for racialism, and guarding against it, while responding to real and legitimate racial needs. Thus Negroes need preferential treatment in some areas, and deserve it.” Referring to the manner in which the government had aided earlier groups, he wrote, “The good sense of the country in the past has been to do this kind of thing by informal arrangements, a balanced ticket.” He pointed to the example of Israel arranged to show favoritism to Eastern European Jewish immigrants. Moynihan, “The President and the Negro,” 39; and Moynihan, , “The New Racialism,” in Coping: Essays on the Practice of Government (New York, 1973), 206.Google Scholar

^69. Washington Post, 26 February 1964.

^70. Lemann, Promised Land, 155.

^71. Moynihan, “Poverty and Progress,” 606.

^72. Moynihan, “The President and the Negro,” 36; and idem, Maximum Feasible Misunderstanding (New York, 1970).

^73. Moynihan, The Negro Family, 3. Interestingly, Nathan Glazer, responding to Charles Murray's Bell Curve, recently embraced affirmative action on these grounds. Glazer, Nathan, “The Lying Game,” The New Republic, 31 October 1994, 15–16.Google Scholar

^74. Hill, Gladwin, “Relief Job Begun,” New York Times, 17 August 1965.Google Scholar

^75. A Report by the Governor's Commission on the Riots, Los Angelos, Violence in the City—An End or a Beginning? in The Politics of Riot Commissions, ed. Platt, Anthony (New York, 1971), 267.Google Scholar

^76. Schanberg, Sydney H., “Sociologists Say Latest Riots Differ from Those of the Past,” New York Times, 17 August 1965, 17.Google Scholar

^77. Wall Street Journal, 16 August 1965.

^78. Leo Despres was an expert on British Guiana (now Guyana). Whitten, Norman E. Jr. and Szwed, John F., Afro-American Anthropology: Contemporary Perspectives (New York, 1970), viii.Google Scholar

^79. Ryan, William, “Savage Discovery: The Moynihan Report.” Nation 201 (December 27, 1965): 527.Google Scholar

^80. Whitney Young, “The ‘Real’ Moynihan Report,” in The Moynihan Report, ed. Rainwater and Yancey, 415–16.

^81. Skillin, Edward S., “The Negro Family,” Commonweal 82 (September 1965): 649–50Google Scholar

^82. Lincoln, C. Eric, “The Absent Father Haunts the Negro Family,” Sounds of the Struggle (New York, 1967), 164–68.Google Scholar

^83. Frank Riessman, “In Defense of the Negro Family,” in The Moynihan Report, 478.

^84. Ibid., 443.

^85. Ibid., 383.

^86. Ryan, William, “The New Genteel Racism,” Crisis 72 (December 1965): 629.Google Scholar

^87. Whitney Young, “The ‘Real’ Moynihan Report,” in The Moynihan Report, ed. Rainwater and Yancey, 415–16.

^88. Bill Moyers, quoted in Lemann, Promised Land, 182.