Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T18:41:24.839Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thermodynamic bounds on the magnetic fluctuation energy in unstable anisotropic plasmas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

R. C. Davidson
Affiliation:
Center for Theoretical Physics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Maryland
S. T. Tsai
Affiliation:
Center for Theoretical Physics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Maryland

Abstract

Thermodynamic bounds on the magnetic fluctuation energy in unstable anisotropic plasmas are obtained. The spatial variation in equilibrium and perturbed quantities is assumed to be exclusively in the z direction, which coincides with the direction of a uniform external magnetic field B0êz. In addition, the positive ions are assumed to form a fixed (mi→ ∞) background providing overall charge neutrality, and only the electron dynamics are included in the analysis. For this configuration it has recently been shown that the non-linear Vlasov–Maxwell equations support two independent energy constants for arbitrary-amplitude electromagnetic disturbances propagating parallel to B0 êz. In this paper, Fowler's method for calculating thermodynamic bounds on the field energy in unstable plasmas is generalized to incorporate two energy constraints (in addition to entropy and number conservation). An upper bound on the magnetic fluctuation energy is obtained for arbitrary initial distribution function fe0 = fe(z, v, 0), and the results are applied to unstable (i) bi-Maxwellian and (ii) loss-cone distributions. Depending on the parameter regime, it is found that the bounds obtained by enforcing two energy constraints can be an order-of-magnitude lower than the bounds obtained by enforcing a single (total) energy constraint. The theoretical bounds are compa red with the maximum change in field energy measured in computer simulation experiments for the case where fe0 is bi-Maxwellian. For sufficiently large initial anisotropy, it is found that the bound obtained with two energy constraints is less than 1·5 times the measured change in field energy.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akinrimisi, J. & Sudan, R. N. 1971 J. Plasma Phys. 5, 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, R. L. & Davidson, R. C. 1972 Phys. Fluids, 15. (To be published.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidsion, R. C., Haber, I. & Hammer, D. A. 1971 Phys. Lett. A 34, 235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, R. C. & Hammer, D. A. 1971 Phys. Fluids, 14, 1452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, R. C. & Hammer, D. A. 1972 Phys. Fluids, 15, 1282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, R. C., Hammer, D. A., Haber, I. & Wagner, C. E. 1972 Phys. Fluids, 15, 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairfield, D. H. 1969 J. Geophys. Res. 74, 3541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, T. K. 1963 J. Math. Phys. 4, 559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, T. K. 1968 Advances in Plasma Physics (ed. Simon, A. and Thompson, W. B.), vol. 1, p. 201. Interscienee.Google Scholar
Hamasaki, S. & Krall, N. A. 1973 Phys. Fluids, 16. (To be published.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ossakow, S., Haber, I. & Ott, E. 1972 Phys. Fluids, 15, 1538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmadesso, P. & Schmidt, G. 1971 Phys. Fluids, 14, 1411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russel, C. T., Childers, D. D. & Coleman, P. J. 1971 J. Geophys. Res. 76, 845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sudan, R. & Ott, E. 1971 J. Geophys. Res. 76, 4463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, C. S. 1971 J. Geophys. Res. 76, 4463.Google Scholar