Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T15:29:33.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Magnetic field-line reconnexion by localized enhancement of resistivity. Part 4. Dependence on the magnitude of resistivity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

Masayuki Ugai
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Japan
Takao Tsuda
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan

Abstract

The present paper quantitatively examines how the process of fast reconnexion depends on the magnitude of the local resistivity enhanced in the vicinity of the magnetic neutral point. It is shown that quasi-steady Petschek-type configurations are set up, one for each of the variously imposed local resistivity enhancements. The fundamental structure of the quasi-steady configuration is largely controlled by the initially indented value of locally enhanced resistivity. It is especially remarked that the width of the diffusion region becomes smaller as the locally enhanced resistivity becomes smaller. We find that each of the quasi-steady configurations presents nothing other than the Petschek-type configuration that corresponds to the allowable maximum reconnexion rate for the relevant magnetic Reynolds number. We also see that the magnitude of fast reconnexion rate has a weak dependence on the local resistivity in the diffusion region. All our numerical results are very consistent with previous theoretical work on the fast reconnexion problem, once the problem is reconsidered from another angle. We hence suggest that the process of fast reconnexion should be viewed as a gross instability, inherent to the current sheet system itself, that can be triggered by some local onset of anomalous resistivity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Amano, K., & Tsuda, T., 1978, J. Geomag. Geoelec. 30, 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratenahl, A., & Baum, P. J., 1976, Solar Phys. 47, 345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, E. N., 1963, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 8, 177.Google Scholar
Parker, E. N., 1973, J. Plasma Phys. 9, 49.Google Scholar
Petschek, H. E., 1964 AAS-NASA Symposium, Physics of Solar Flares, NASA SP-50, p. 425.Google Scholar
Priest, E. R., & Soward, A. M., 1976 Basic Mechanism of Solar Activity (ed. Bumba, and Kleczek, ), p. 353. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soward, A. M., & Priest, E. R. 1977 Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. 284, 369.Google Scholar
Sweet, P. A.. 1958 Nuovo Cimento, 8, 188.Google Scholar
Tsuda, T. & Ugai, M., 1977 J. Plasma Phys. 18, 451.Google Scholar
Ugai, M. & Tsuda, T. 1977 J. Plasma Phys. 17, 337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ugai, M. & Tsuda, T. 1979 J. Plasma Phys. 21, 459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasyliunas, V. 1975 Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 13, 303.Google Scholar