Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T09:27:32.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The expansion of a plasma from a spherical source into a vacuum Part 2. Partially-ionized flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

Judith Goldfinch
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow

Extract

This paper introduces the effects of partial ionization and recombination into the steady supersonic spherical source expansion of a plasma. It presents an analytical solution for a problem previously solved only numerically, using moment equations derived directly from the Boltzmann equation under the assumption of an ellipsoidal distribution function. The recombination is assumed collisionalradiative, as considered by Bates, Kingston & MeWhirter (1962a, b) and an approximate rate constant is derived from their results. The plasma is taken to be optically thick. The results show that, in a highly ionized plasma, the species maintain equal isotropic temperatures for the main part of the flow, with the degree of ionization tending to a finite limit. Recombinations, however, remain sufficiently frequent to keep the temperature above that in an expansion with no recombination. In a weakly ionized plasma the temperature of the heavy particles is almost unaffected by recombinations and falls adiabatically, although the electron temperature remains high. The analytical results are compared with the numerical results of Chou & Talbot (1967).

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bates, D. R., Kingston, A. E. & McWhirter, R. W. P. 1962 a Proc. Roy. Soc. A 267, 297.Google Scholar
Bates, D. R., Kingston, A. E. & McWhirter, R. W. P. 1962 b Proc. Roy. Soc. A 270, 155.Google Scholar
Byron, S., Stabler, R. C. & Bortz, P. I. 1962 Phys. Rev. Letters 8, 376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, S. & Cowling, T. G. 1960 Mathematical Theory of Non-Uniform Gases. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chou, Y. S. & Talbot, L. 1967 AIAA Journal 5, 2166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, A. L. & Bienkowski, G. K. 1966 Proc. 5th Int. Symp. on Rarefied Gas Dynamics 1, 861. Academic.Google Scholar
Gol'Dfarb, V. M., Kostygova, I. E. & Luk'Yanov, G. A. 1969 High Temp. 7, 558.Google Scholar
Goldfinch, J. & Pack, D. C. 1971 J. Plasma Phys. 6, 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamel, B. B. & Willis, D. R. 1966 Phys. Fluids 9, 829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holway, L. H. 1965 Proc. 4th Int. Symp. on Rarefied Gas Dynamics, 1, 193. Academic.Google Scholar