Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T16:47:15.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Examining the range of validity of the Bohm criterion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2014

R. Morales Crespo*
Affiliation:
Department de Física, Universidad de Córdoba, Campus de Rabanales Ed. C2. 14071, Spain
R. N. Franklin
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy and Physics, The Open University, Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire MK7 6AA, UK
*
Email address for correspondence: rutphysics@gmail.com

Abstract

This work shows that there is no such thing as a formulation of the Bohm criterion for the case of a collisional plasma. It examines critically the work of several authors who have sought to promote their own version of what has come to be called a collisionally modified Bohm criterion.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, J. E. 2009 The plasma-sheath boundary: its history and Langmuir's definition of the sheath edge. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 18 (1), 014004.Google Scholar
Almeida, N. A. and Benilov, M. S. 2012 Physics of the intermediate layer between a plasma and a collisionless sheath and mathematical meaning of the Bohm criterion. Phys. Plasmas 19 (7), 073514.Google Scholar
Benilov, M. S. 2009 The Child–Langmuir law and analytical theory of collisionless to collision-dominated sheaths. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 18 (1), 014005.Google Scholar
El Kaouini, M., Chatei, H., Driouch, I. and El Hammouti, M. 2011 Ion temperature effect on Bohm criterion for magnetized plasma sheath. J. Fusion Energy 30 (2), 199204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, R. N. 2002 What significance does the Bohm criterion have in an active collisional plasma-sheath? J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 35 (18), 22702273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, R. N. 2003a Joining active plasma and sheath when the plasma contains two species of positive ions. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 36 (1), 3438.Google Scholar
Franklin, R. N. 2003b The plasma-sheath boundary region. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 36 (22), R309320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, R. N. 2003c There is no such thing as a collisionally modified Bohm criterion. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 36 (22), 28212824.Google Scholar
Franklin, R. N. 2004 Where is the ‘sheath edge’? J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 37 (9), 13421345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghomi, H. and Khoramabadi, M. 2010 Influence of ion temperature on plasma sheath transition. J. Plasma Phys. 76, 247255.Google Scholar
Ghomi, H. and Khoramabadi, M. 2011 Effect of negative ion parameters on sheath formation criterion in electronegative plasmas. J. Fusion Energy 30 (6), 481486.Google Scholar
Ghomi, H., Khoramabadi, M., Shukla, P. K. and Ghorannevis, M. 2010 Plasma sheath criterion in thermal electronegative plasmas. J. Appl. Phys. 108 (6), 063302.Google Scholar
Godyak, V. A. 1982 Modified Bohm criterion for a collisional plasma. Phys. Lett. A 89 (2), 8081.Google Scholar
Hatami, M. M. and Shokri, B. 2012 Bohm's criterion in a collisional magnetized plasma with thermal ions. Phys. Plasmas 19 (8), 083510.Google Scholar
Ji, Y., Zou, X., Liu, H. and Qiu, M. 2011 Bohm criterion in a magnetized plasma sheath. Plasma Sci. Technol. 13 (5), 519522.Google Scholar
Kono, A. 2003 Plasma sheath transition and ion sound speed in weakly collisional plasmas. Phys. Plasmas 10 (10), 41814184.Google Scholar
Liu, J. Y., Wang, Z. X. and Wang, X. G. 2003 Sheath criterion for a collisional sheath. Phys. Plasmas 10 (7), 3032.Google Scholar
Riemann, K. U. 1991 The Bohm criterion and sheath formation. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 24 (4), 493518.Google Scholar
Riemann, K. U. 1997 The influence of collisions on the plasma sheath transition. Phys. Plasmas 4 (11), 41584166.Google Scholar
Riemann, K. U. 2009 Plasma and sheath. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 18 (1), 014006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar