Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T09:17:16.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Theory of the mutual impedance of two small dipoles in a warm isotropic plasma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

R. Pottelette
Affiliation:
Groupe de Recherches Ionosphériques du CNRS, 94100 Saint-Maur des Fossés, France
B. Rooy
Affiliation:
Groupe de Recherches Ionosphériques du CNRS, 94100 Saint-Maur des Fossés, France
V. Fiala
Affiliation:
Geophysical Institute, Prague 4, Sporilov, Czechoslovakia

Abstract

We show theoretically that the electron density and temperature of a plasma could be deduced from the measurements of the transfer impedance between two small dipole antennae, each much shorter than a Debye length, separated by a distance of ten or more Debye lengths. In contrast to the quadripole probe, this ‘double-dipole probe’ relies on not producing perturbations in the plasma, rather than on minimizing their effects. The plasma is assumed to be warm and isotropic, and the motion of the ions is neglected. First, it is shown that, in a Maxwellian plasma, the frequency response of a double-dipole probe is easier to interpret than that of a quadripole probe with the customary square layout. Then, in a second step, the transfer impedance of the former probe is calculated in a Cauchy plasma, and the results are compared with those previously obtained in a Maxwellian plasma. By so doing, we show that, for large distances between the dipoles, the real part of the transfer impedance is sensitive to the form of the tail of the distribution function.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andronov, A. A. 1966 Kosmish. Issled. 4, 558.Google Scholar
Balmain, K. G. 1964 IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagation, 12, 605.Google Scholar
Beghin, C. & Debrie, R. 1972 J. Plasma Phys. 8, 231.Google Scholar
Bekefi, G. 1966 Radiation Processes in Plasmas. Wiley.Google Scholar
Chasseriaux, J. M., Debrie, R. & Renard, C. 1972 J. Plasma Phys. 8, 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chasseriaux, J. M., 1973 Doctorat d' Etat Thesis, University of Paris 6.Google Scholar
Derfler, H. & Simonen, T. C. 1969 Phys. Fluids, 12, 269.Google Scholar
Derfler, H. 1965 Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on Phenomena in Ionized Gases, Belgrade, vol. 2, p. 282.Google Scholar
Feix, M. R. 1964 Phys. Lett. 9, 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fried, B. D. & Conte, S. D. 1961. The Plasma Dispersion Function. Academic.Google Scholar
Gould, R. W. 1964 Phys. Rev. 136 A, 991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuehl, H. H. 1967 Radio Sci. 2, 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rooy, B., Feix, M. R. & Storey, L. R. O. 1972 Plasma Phys. 14, 275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shafranov, V. D. 1967 Reviews of Plasma Physics, 3, 1. Plenum.Google Scholar
Simonen, T. C. 1966 Stanford University, Institute for Plasma Research, Rep. 100.Google Scholar
Sitenko, A. G. 1965 Electromagnetic Fluctuations in Plasma. Academic.Google Scholar
Storey, L. R. O., Aubry, M. P. & Meyer, P. 1969 Plasma Waves in Space and in the Laboratory (ed. Thomas, J. O. and Landmark, B. J.), vol. 1, p. 303. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Watson, S. R. 1968 J. Plasma Phys. 2, 437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar