Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-04T21:20:03.129Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fiscal effects of the Norwegian pension reform – A micro–macro assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2017

DENNIS FREDRIKSEN ,
ERLING HOLMØY ,
BIRGER STRØM  and
NILS MARTIN STØLEN
DENNIS FREDRIKSEN
Affiliation:
Statistics Norway, Oslo, Norway (e-mail: dff@ssb.no)
ERLING HOLMØY
Affiliation:
Statistics Norway, Oslo, Norway (e-mail: erl@ssb.no)
BIRGER STRØM
Affiliation:
Statistics Norway, Oslo, Norway (e-mail: bgs@ssb.no)
NILS MARTIN STØLEN
Affiliation:
Statistics Norway, Oslo, Norway (e-mail: nms@ssb.no)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The main goal of the Norwegian pension reform of 2011 is to improve long run fiscal sustainability, not least through stronger labour supply incentives. We assess to what extent the reform is likely to live up to these intentions. To this end we combine a dynamic microsimulation model, which includes a complete description of the Norwegian population and the pension system, with CGE-modelling of the effects on all government revenues and expenditures. We find that the reform is likely to make a great fiscal impact in the long run, and higher employment plays an important role in this respect.

Keywords

H30H55H62H68O15Pension reformsfiscal sustainabilityincome distributioncomputable general equilibrium modeldynamic microsimulation
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Pension Economics & Finance , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , January 2019 , pp. 88 - 123
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, D., Finkelstein, A. and Notowidigdo, M. J. (2013) Income and health spending: evidence from oil price shocks. The Review of Economics and Statistics, XCV(4): 1079–1095.Google Scholar
Auerbach, A. J. and Kotlikoff, L. J. (1987) Dynamic Fiscal Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beetsma, R., Bettendorf, L. and Broer, P. (2003) The budgeting and economic consequences of ageing in the Netherlands. Economic Modelling, 20: 987–1013.Google Scholar
Blanchet, D. and Minez, S. L. (2009) Projecting pensions and age at retirement in France. Some lessons from the Destinie 1 Model. In Zaidi, A., Harding, A. and Williamson, P. (eds), New Frontiers in Microsimulation Modelling. Ashgate, United Kingdom and USA, pp. 287–306.Google Scholar
Bloom, D., Canning, D. and Moore, M. (2004) Health, Longevity and Optimal Retirement. Mimeo, August 2004, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Börsch-Supan, A., Hank, K. and Jürges, H. (2005) A new comprehensive and international view on ageing: introducing the survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe. European Journal of Ageing, 2(4): 245–253.Google Scholar
Bovenberg, L. and Knaap, T. (2005) Ageing, funded pensions and the Dutch economy. CESIFO Working Paper 1403.Google Scholar
Brinch, C., Hernæs, E. and Strøm, S. (2001) Labour supply effects of an early retirement program. Memorandum 33/2001, Department of Economics, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Chan, S. and Stevens, A. H. (2003) Do changes in pension incentives affect retirement? A longitudinal study of subjective retirement expectations. Journal of Public Economics, 88: 1307–1333.Google Scholar
Christensen, A. M., Fredriksen, D., Lien, O. C. and Stølen, N. M. (2012) Pension reform in Norway: combining NDC and distributional goals. In Holzmann, R., Palmer, E. and Robalino, D. (eds), Nonfinancial Defined Contribution Pension Schemes in A Changing Pension World : Progress, Lessons, and Implementation. © Washington, DC: World Bank, pp. 129–154. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/9378.Google Scholar
Cockburn, J., Savard, L. and Tiberti, L. (2014) Macro-micro models. In O'Donoghue, C. (ed.), Handbook of Microsimulation Modelling. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limitied, ch. 9, pp. 275–304.Google Scholar
Coile, C. and Gruber, J. (2003) Fiscal effects of social security reforms in the United States. Working Paper 2003–05, Center for Retirement Research at the Boston College. http://www.bc.edu/crr.Google Scholar
Conesa, J. C. and Krueger, D. (1999) Social security reform with heterogeneous agents. Review of Economic Dynamics, 2: 757–795.Google Scholar
Dahl, E. H. and Lien, O. C. (2013) Pensjonsreformen – flere i arbeid. Arbeid og velferd 1/2013, Directorate for Labour and Welfare Administration, 58–71. (in Norwegian).Google Scholar
Díaz-Giménez, J. and Díaz-Saavedra, J. (2009) Delaying retirement in Spain. Review of Economic Dynamics, 12: 147–167.Google Scholar
Eisensee, T. (2006) Essays on public finance: retirement behaviour and disaster relief. Monograph Series No. 54, Institute for international economic studies, University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
Fehr, H. (2009) Computable stochastic equilibrium models and their use in pension and ageing research. De Economist, Springer, 157(4): 359–416.Google Scholar
Fehr, H. and Habermann, C. (2008) Risk sharing and efficiency implications of progressive pension arrangements. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 110(2): 419–443.Google Scholar
Fehr, H., Habermann, C. and Kindermann, F. (2008) Social security with rational and hyperbolic consumers. Review of Economic Dynamics, 11: 884–903.Google Scholar
Fehr, H., Kallweit, M. and Kindermann, F. (2012) Pension reform with variable retirement age: a simulation analysis for Germany. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 11(3): 389–417.Google Scholar
Flood, L. (2007) Can we afford the future? An evaluation of the New Swedish Pension System. In Harding, A. and Gupta, A. (eds) Modelling our Future: Population Ageing, Social Security and Taxation. International Symposia in Economic Theory and Econometrics, Elsevier, Amsterdam, vol. 15, pp. 33–54.Google Scholar
Fredriksen, D. (1998) Projections of Population, Education, Labour Supply and Public Pension Benefits. Analyses with the Dynamic Simulation Model MOSART. Social and Economic Studies 101. Statistics Norway, Oslo.Google Scholar
Fredriksen, D. and Stølen, N. M. (2007) Effects of demographic developments, labour supply and pension reforms on the future pension burden in Norway. In Harding, A. and Gupta, A. (eds), Modelling our Future: Population Ageing, Social Security and Taxation. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 81–106.Google Scholar
Fredriksen, D. and Stølen, N. M. (2011) Norwegian pension reform – defined benefit versus defined contribution. Discussion Papers 669, Statistics Norway, Oslo.Google Scholar
Fredriksen, D. and Stølen, N. M. (2014) Gender aspects of the Norwegian Pension System. In Dekkers, G., Keegan, M. and O'Donoghue, C. (eds), New Pathways in Microsimulation. Ashgate, England and USA, pp. 93–108.Google Scholar
Galaasen, S. (2014 a) Pension reform disabled. In Essays on quantitative macroeconomics with heterogeneous agents, Ph.D-thesis, Department of Economics, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Galaasen, S. (2014 b) Retirement and benefit claiming with heterogeneous agents: analyzing the macroeconomic effects of the Norwegian pension reform. In Essays on quantitative macroeconomics with heterogeneous agents, Ph.D-thesis, Department of Economics, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Galaasen, S., Holmøy, E. and Stølen, N. M. (2015) Review on Nordic and international literature on pension systems and fiscal sustainability, Draft, April 2015.Google Scholar
Gruber, J. and Wise, D. (eds) (2004) Social Security and Retirement Around the World. Micro-estimation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Harenberg, D. and Ludwig, A. (2014) Social Security and the Interactions between Aggregate and Idiosyncratic Risk. ETH Risk Center – Working Paper Series.Google Scholar
Heckman, J. (1993) What has been learned about labour supply in the past twenty years? American Economic Review, 83: 116–121.Google Scholar
Hernæs, E. and Jia, Z. (2013) Earnings distributions and labour supply after a retirement earnings test reform. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 75(3): 410–434.Google Scholar
Hernæs, E., Markussen, S., Piggott, J. and Røed, K. (2016) Pension reform and labour supply. Journal of Public Economics, 142: 39–55.Google Scholar
Hirte, G. (2002) Welfare and macroeconomic effects of the German pension acts of 1992 and 1999: a dynamic CGE study. German Economic Review, 3(1): 81–106.Google Scholar
Holmøy, E. and Stensnes, K. (2008) Will the Norwegian pension reform reach its goals? An integrated micro-macro assessment. Discussion Papers No. 557, Statistics Norway.Google Scholar
Holmøy, E. and Strøm, B. (2012 a) Macroeconomy and Government Finances in Different Scenarios for Immigration, Reports 15/2012, Statistics Norway (in Norwegian).Google Scholar
Holmøy, E. and Strøm, B. (2012 b) Some fallacies in the use of age profiles in analyses of fiscal sustainability. Forthcoming as Discussion Paper, Statistics Norway.Google Scholar
Holmøy, E. and Strøm, B. (2017) Some fallacies in the use of age profiles in analyses of fiscal sustainability, forthcoming as Discussion paper, Statistics Norway.Google Scholar
Immervoll, H., Kleven, H. J., Kreiner, C. T. and Saez, E. (2007) Welfare reform in European countries: a microsimulation analysis. Economic Journal, 117: 1–44.Google Scholar
Imrohoroglu, S. and Kitao, S. (2012) Social security reforms: benefit claiming, labor force participation and long-run sustainability. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 4(3): 96–127.Google Scholar
Krueger, D. and Kubler, F. (2006) Pareto-improving social security reform when financial markets are incomplete. American Economic Review, 96(3): 737–755.Google Scholar
Leombruni, R. and Mosca, M. (2014) The redistributive features of the Italian pension system: the importance of being neutral. In Dekkers, G., Keegan, M. and O'Donoghue, C. (eds), New Pathways in Microsimulation. Ashgate, England and USA, pp. 109–128.Google Scholar
Lindbeck, A. (2006) Sustainable social spending. International Tax and Public Finance, 13(4): 303–324.Google Scholar
Ministry of Finance (2013) The Perspective Report 2013 (in Norwegian).Google Scholar
Morrison, R. J. (2007) Adding private pensions to the Canadian DYNACAN model. In Harding, A. and Gupta, A. (eds), Modelling our Future: Population Ageing, Social Security and Taxation. International Symposia in Economic Theory and Econometrics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, vol. 15, pp. 143–170.Google Scholar
Nishiyama, S. and Smetters, K. (2007) Does social security privatization produce efficiency gains? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(4): 1677–1719.Google Scholar
NOU 2004:1 Modernisert Folketrygd. Bærekraftig Pensjon for Framtida. The Ministry of Finance and Ministry of Social Affairs 2004, Oslo (in Norwegian).Google Scholar
OECD (2013 a) Pensions at a Glance 2013: OECD and G20 Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. Doi: 10.1787/pension_glance-2013-en.Google Scholar
OECD (2013 b) Public Spending on Health and Long-Term-Care: A New Set of Projections. OECD Economic Policy Papers, Paris.Google Scholar
Orcutt, G. H., Merz, J. and Quinke, H. (eds) (1986) Microanalytic Simulation Models to Support Social and Financial Policy. New York: North Holland.Google Scholar
Samwick, A. (1998) New evidence on pensions, social security, and the timing of retirement. Journal of Public Economics, 70(2): 207–236.Google Scholar
Sánchez Martín, A. R. (2010) Endogenous retirement and public pension system reform in Spain. Economic Modelling 27: 336–349.Google Scholar
Statistics Norway (2014) Population Projections, 2014–2100. http://www.ssb.no/en/befolkning/statistikker/folkfram.Google Scholar
Stensnes, K. (2007) Equity versus Efficiency in Public Pension Schemes – Microsimulating the Trade-off. Discussion Papers No. 515, Statistics Norway.Google Scholar
Stølen, N. M. (2007) How to prevent increased pension expenditures in a defined benefit system when life expectancy improves? Revue bancaire et financière, 2: 98–105.Google Scholar
Tønnessen, M., Syse, A. and Aase, K. N. (2014) (in Norwegian): Befolkningsframskrivinger 2014–2100: Hovedresultater. Økonomiske analyser 4/2014, Statistics Norway, pp. 30–36.Google Scholar