Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T14:30:45.818Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Systematic Paleontology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Jonathan M. Adrain
Jonathan M. Adrain*
Affiliation:
Department of Geoscience, University of Iowa, 121 Trowbridge Hall, Iowa City 52242,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

With this issue we mark publication of the 75th volume of the Journal of Paleontology, and celebrate the occasion with a series of review articles on the systematics of major groups of fossils. Instructions to authors were very broad: we suggested consideration of the history of study, current problems, and future directions, but otherwise left authors to focus their reviews as they saw fit. We hoped in this way, with a mix of traditions and approaches, to fashion a general overview of the systematics of fossil organisms as practiced today. With the enthusiastic efforts of the contributors, I think we've been successful. The papers in this issue comprise authoritative reviews of the state of the art in various branches of paleontology. But even if one is not concerned with the details of particular groups, the contributions provide a fascinating sense of where the discipline is, and where it might be going. Although concerned mainly with systematic history, they nevertheless provide a flavor of the kinds of concerns we have as a community for the future development of our science.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 75 , Issue 6 , November 2001 , pp. 1055 - 1057
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boucot, A. J. 1979. Cladistics: Is it really different from classical taxonomy?, p. 199–210. In Eldredge, N. and Cracraft, J. (eds.), Phylogenetic Analysis and Paleontology. Columbia University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erwin, D. H., and Wing, S. L. 1996. From the incoming editors. Paleobiology, 22:113–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldmann, R. M., and Manning, R. B. 1992. Crisis in systematic biology in the “Age of Biodiversity”. Journal of Palaeontology, 66:157–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foote, M. J. 2001. Response by Michael J. Foote for the Schuchert Award, October, 2000. Journal of Paleontology, 75:924–925.Google Scholar
Lee, M. S. Y. 2000. A worrying systematic decline. TREE, 15:346.Google ScholarPubMed
MacLeod, N., and Guralnick, R. 2000. Paleoinformatics, p. 31–36. In Lane, H. R., Steininger, F. F., Kaesler, R. L., Zeigler, W., and Lipps, J. (eds.), Fossils and the Future: Paleontology in the 21st Century. Senckenberg Museum, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Patterson, C., and Smith, A. B. 1988. Periodicity in extinction: The role of systematics. Ecology, 70:802–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scotland, R. W., and Pennington, T. 2000. Homology and Systematics: Coding Characters for Phylogenetic Analysis (Systematics Association Special Volume, 58). Taylor and Francis, London, 232 p.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1981. A factor analytic description of the Phanerozoic marine fossil record. Paleobiology, 7:36–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1984. A kinetic model of Phanerozoic taxonomic diversity; III, Post-Paleozoic families and mass extinctions. Paleobiology, 10:246–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1989. Periodicity in extinction and the problem of catastrophism in the history of life. Journal of the Geological Society of London, 146:7–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wagner, G. (ed.). 2000. The character concept in evolutionary biology. Academic Press, London, 622 p.Google Scholar
Wiens, J. J. (ed.). 2000. Phylogenetic analysis of morphological data. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, 220 p.Google Scholar