Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T22:05:49.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ontogenies and astogenies and their significance in some favositid and heliolitid corals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

J. P. A. Noble  and
D.-J. Lee
J. P. A. Noble
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of New Brunswick, P. O. Box 4400, Fredericton E3B 5A3, Canada
D.-J. Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of New Brunswick, P. O. Box 4400, Fredericton E3B 5A3, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The level of colony integration in tabulate corals is the degree of colony unity with respect to behavior, physiology, and development of individual organs or organ complexes within colonies. These are difficult to assess in fossils, but the level of colony integration can be tested by analyzing ontogenies and astogenies of two common Paleozoic tabulate coral groups, favositids and heliolitids. Favositids have been previously interpreted as highly integrated colonies, but results of the present examination suggest that the level of colony integration in favositids was rather lower than hitherto assumed. The ontogenies and astogenies in favositid colonies are not correlatable; thus, the significance of ontogenetic and astogenetic variations for systematic and phylogenetic resolution in favositids is difficult to assess at present. In contrast, astogenetic developmental sequences are recognized in heliolitids. Ontogenies in heliolitids were subordinated to the astogeny of the colony. This is closely related to the high degree of colony integration with respect to behavior and physiology of individual organs or organ complexes within colonies. Individual corallites were well linked and coordinated so that the whole colony could have functioned as a single individual. As a result, evolution in heliolitids operated at the colony level and by heterochronic (and other) modifications of astogenies rather than of ontogenies.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 64 , Issue 4 , July 1990 , pp. 515 - 523
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anstey, R. L. 1987. Astogeny and phylogeny: evolutionary heterochrony in Paleozoic bryozoans. Paleobiology, 13:20–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beecher, C. E. 1891a. The development of a Paleozoic coral. Connecticut Academy of Art and Science Transactions, 8:207–214.Google Scholar
Beecher, C. E. 1891b. Symmetrical cell development in the Favositidae. Connecticut Academy of Art and Science Transactions, 8:207–214.Google Scholar
Beklemishev, V. N. 1964. Principle of Comparative Anatomy of Invertebrates, Vol. 1, Promorphology, 3rd ed. Moscow, 490 p. [Translated 1970 by Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh and University of Chicago Press.]Google Scholar
Boardman, R. S., and Cheetham, A. H. 1973. Degrees of colony dominance in stenolaemate and gymnolaemate Bryozoa, p. 121–220. In Boardman, R. S., Cheetham, A. H., and Oliver, W. A. (eds.), Animal Colonies; Their Development and Function Through Time. Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Inc., Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Boardman, R. S., and Cheetham, A. H. 1983. Glossary of morphological terms, p. G304–G320. In Robison, R. A. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. G, Bryozoa, Vol. 1, Introduction. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Bolton, T. E. 1972. Geological map and notes on the Ordovician and Silurian litho- and biostratigraphy, Anticosit Island, Québec. Geological Survey of Canada, Paper 71–19, 45 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bondarenko, O. B. 1975. The astogenetic method of studying colonial coelenterates (with particular reference to the heliolitoidea). Paleontological Journal, 9:145–154.Google Scholar
Bondarenko, O. B. 1978. Variation and astophyletic development in some Upper Silurian heliolitids from the Podolian part of the Dnestr region. Paleontological Journal, 12:432–449.Google Scholar
Bondarenko, O. B. 1980. Methods and results of a study of asto- and phylogenesis of the heliolitoids, p. 56–67. In Proceedings of the 4th All-Union Paleontologic Symposium on the Study of Fossil Corals, Korallyi rify fanerozoya SSSR (Phanerozoic corals and reefs of the USSR). Nauka, Moscow (in Russian).Google Scholar
Bondarenko, O. B. 1983. One pattern of evolution of heliolitoids. Paleontological Journal, 17:125–128.Google Scholar
Coates, A. G., and Jackson, J. B. C. 1985. Morphological themes in the evolution of clonal and aclonal invertebrates, p. 67–106. In Jackson, J. B. C., Buss, L. W., and Cook, R. E. (eds.), Population Biology and Evolution of Clonal Organisms. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
Coates, A. G., and Jackson, J. B. C. 1987. Clonal growth, algal symbiosis, and reef formation by corals. Paleobiology, 13:363–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, A. G., and Oliver, W. A. 1973. Coloniality in zoantharian corals, p. 3–27. In Boardman, R. S., Cheetham, A. H., and Oliver, W. A. (eds.), Animal Colonies; Their Development and Function Through Time. Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Inc., Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Girty, G. H. 1895. Development of the corallum in Favosites forbesi var. occidentalis. American Geologist, 15:131–146.Google Scholar
Hickey, D. R. 1988. Bryozoan astogeny and evolutionary novelties: their role in the origin and systematics of the Ordovician monticuliporid trepostome genus Peronopora. Journal of Paleontology, 62:180–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Highsmith, R. C. 1982. Reproduction by fragmentation in corals. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 7:207–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, D. 1935. British terminology for rugose corals. Geological Magazine, 72:481–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, D. 1956. Rugosa, p. F233–F324. In Teichert, C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. F, Coelenterata. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Hill, D. 1981. Rugosa and Tabulata, 762 p. In Teichert, C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. F, Coelenterata, Supplement 1. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Hill, D., and Stumm, E. C. 1956. Tabulata, p. F444–F477. In Teichert, C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. F, Coelenterata. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Hughes, R. N., and Cancino, J. M. 1985. An ecological overview of cloning in Metazoa, p. 153–186. In Jackson, J. B. C., Buss, L. W., and Cook, R. E. (eds.), Population Biology and Evolution of Clonal Organisms. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. B. C. 1981. Interspecific competition and species' distributions. The ghosts of theories and data past. American Zoologist, 21:889–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, J. B. C. 1985. Distribution and ecology of clonal and aclonal benthic invertebrates, p. 297–355. In Jackson, J. B. C., Buss, L. W., and Cook, R. E. (eds.), Population Biology and Evolution of Clonal Organisms. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. B. C., Buss, L. W., and Cook, R. E. 1985. Population Biology and Evolution of Clonal Organisms. Yale University Press, New Haven, 575 p.Google Scholar
Jull, R. K. 1973. Ontogeny and hystero-ontogeny in the Middle Devonian rugose coral Hexagonaria anna (Whitfield), p. 59–68. In Boardman, R. S., Cheetham, A. H., and Oliver, W. A. (eds.), Animal Colonies; Their Development and Function Through Time. Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Inc., Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Larwood, G., and Rosen, B. R. 1979. Biology and Systematics of Colonial Organisms. Academic Press, London and New York, 591 p.Google Scholar
Laufeld, S. 1974. Reference localities for palaeontology and geology in the Silurian of Gotland. Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning (SGU) C705, 172 p.Google Scholar
Lee, D.-J., and Noble, J. P. A. 1988. Evaluation of corallite size as a criterion for species discrimination in favositids. Journal of Paleontology, 62:32–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, D.-J., Young, G. A., and Noble, J. P. A. 1990. Heterochronic evolution in the Heliolites interstinctus–decipiens lineage of the Chaleur Bay region, Eastern Canada. Lethaia, 23:11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leleshus, V. L. 1984. New data on the systematics and phylogeny of the favositids. 24 p. [Translated by Geological Survey of Canada, ISPG, Calgary, from the Russian in Tabulyatomorfhye korally ordovika i silura SSSR, Trudy I, Vsesoyuznogo simpoziuma po izucheniyu iskopaemykh korallov SSSR, p. 103–112.]Google Scholar
Lindström, G. 1899. Remarks on the Heliolitidae. Kongliga Svenska Vetenskaps-Akameniens, Handlinger 32:1–140.Google Scholar
Lonsdale, W. 1839. Corals, p. 675–694. In Murchison, R. I.The Silurian System. Vol. 2.Google Scholar
Milne-Edwards, H., and Haime, J. 1851. A monograph of the British fossil corals, Second Part, p. 147–210. In Corals from the Carboniferous Formation. Palaeontographical Society, London.Google Scholar
Mitchell, C. E. 1987. Evolution and phylogenetic classification of the Diplograptacea. Palaeontology, 30:353–405.Google Scholar
Noble, J. P. A., and Young, G. A. 1984. The Llandovery–Wenlock heliolitid corals from New Brunswick, Canada. Journal of Paleontology, 58:867–884.Google Scholar
Oliver, W. A. Jr. 1968. Some aspects of colony development in corals. Journal of Paleontolgy, 425,(Supplement):16–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, W. A. Jr., and Coates, A. G. 1987. Phylum Cnidaria, p. 140–193. In Boardman, R. S., Cheetham, A. H., and Rowell, A. J. (eds.), Fossil Invertebrates. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Palo Alto, California.Google Scholar
Ospanova, N. K. 1979. A new heliolitoid genus and its taxonomic importance. Paleontological Journal, 13:139–145.Google Scholar
Pandolfi, J. M. 1988. Heterochrony in colonial marine animals, p. 135–158. In McKinney, M. L. (ed.). Heterochrony in Evolution. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickards, R. B. 1977. Patterns of evolution in the graptolites, p. 333–358. In Hallam, A. (ed.), Patterns of Evolution, as Illustrated by the Fossil Record. Elsevier, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roemer, C. F. 1861. Die fossil Fauna der silurischen Diluvial-Geschiebe von Sadewitz bei Oels in Nieder-Schlesien. R. Nischkowsky, Breslau, 81 p.Google Scholar
Scrutton, C. T. 1981. The measurement of corallite size in corals. Journal of Paleontology, 55:687–688.Google Scholar
Scrutton, C. T. 1983. Astogeny in the Devonian rugose coral Phillipsastrea nevadensis from northern Canada. Memoir of the Association of Australasian Palaeontologists, 1:237–259.Google Scholar
Scrutton, C. T., and Powell, J. H. 1980. Periodic development of dimetrism in some favositid corals. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 25:477–491.Google Scholar
Sokolov, B. S. 1962. Subclass Tabulata, p. 293–404. In Sokolov, B. S. (ed.), Fundamentals of Paleontology (Osnovy paleontologii), Vol. 2, Porifera, Archaeocyatha, Coelenterata, Vermes. Izdatel'stvo Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Moscow. [Translated 1971 by Israel Program for Scientific Translation, Jerusalem.]Google Scholar
Stel, J. 1978. Studies on Paleobiology of Favositids. Stabo/All-Round B. V., Groningen, 247 p.Google Scholar
Stel, J. 1979a. Environment and quantitative morphology of some Silurian tabulates from Gotland (Sweden). Scripta Geologica, 47:1–75.Google Scholar
Stel, J. 1979b. Lateral increase in Paleofavosites asper (Tabulata). Journal of Paleontology, 53:501–505.Google Scholar
Stel, J., and Oekentorp, K. 1976. On the solenid growth habit of Paleofavosites. Geologie en Mijnbouw, 55:163–174.Google Scholar
Stumm, E. C. 1962. Silurian corals from the Moose River Synclinorium, Maine. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 430-A, p. 1–7.Google Scholar
Urbanek, A. 1973. Organization and evolution of graptolite colonies, p. 441–514. In Boardman, R. S., Cheetham, A. H., and Oliver, W. A. (eds.), Animal Colonies; Their Development and Function Through Time. Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Inc. Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Whitfield, R. P. 1878. Preliminary descriptions of new species of fossils from the lower geological formations of Wisconsin. Wisconsin Geological Survey, Annual Report for 1877, p. 50–89.Google Scholar
Zimmer, R. L., and Woollacott, R. M. 1977. Structure and classification of gymnolaemate larvae, p. 57–89. In Woollacott, R. M. and Zimmer, R. L. (eds.), Biology of Bryozoa. Academic Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar