Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T18:17:25.573Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A new hexactinellid sponge from the Eocene of Kutch, India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

J. Keith Rigby  and
Manmohan Mohanti
J. Keith Rigby
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602
Manmohan Mohanti
Affiliation:
Utkal University, Department of Geology, Vani Vihar, Bhubaneswar-751004 (Orissa), India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A single specimen of the new dictyonine hexactinellid species Verrucocoelia biswasi was collected from the Middle Eocene Fulra Limestone from Lakhpat Fort, Kutch, western India. The euretoid species is broadly bowl-shaped, 7–8 cm wide and 5–6 cm high, with walls of branched to weakly anastomosed tubes that extend upward and outward from a simple, unfluted, walled spongocoel. Skeletal strands diverge upward and outward from near the gastral surface of each tube. The sponge occurs in silty tan marl with abundant alveolinids and less common other large foraminifera, bivalves, and gastropods in sediments thought to have accumulated in a quiet, sheltered environment, possibly a lagoon.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 67 , Issue 6 , November 1993 , pp. 917 - 922
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Biswas, S. K., and Deshpande, S. V. 1975. Geological map of Kutch Basin. Institute of Petroleum Exploration, Oil and Natural Gas Commission, India.Google Scholar
Biswas, S. K., and Deshpande, S. V. 1983. Geology and hydrocarbon prospects of Kutch, Saurashtra and Narmada Basins. Petroleum Asia Journal, November, 1983:111–126.Google Scholar
Biswas, S. K., and Raju, D. S. N. 1973. The rock stratigraphy classification of the Tertiary sediments of Kutch. Bulletin Oil and Natural Gas Commission, 10:37–45.Google Scholar
Bowerbank, J. S. 1862. On the anatomy and physiology of the Spongiadae, Parts II and III. Royal Society of London Philosophical Transactions, 152:746–836, 1087–1135.Google Scholar
Étallon, A. 1859 [1860]. Sur la Classification des Spongiares du Haut-Jura et leur distribution dans les étages. Actes de la Société Jurassiene d'Emulation, Porretruy, p. 129–160.Google Scholar
Goldfuss, G. A. 1833. Petrefacta Germaniae, oder Abbildungen und Beschreibungen der Petrefacten Deutschlands und der Angrenzenden Länden. Düsseldorf, 114 p.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1859. Descriptions of Macandrewia and Myliusia. Two new forms of sponges. Proceedings of the Geological Society of London, 27:437–440.Google Scholar
Ijima, I. 1927. The Hexactinellida of the Siboga Expedition. Siboga-Expeditie, Leiden, Volume 6, 383 p.Google Scholar
Marshall, W. 1875. Untersuchungen über Hexactinelliden. Zeitschrift für Wissenschaften Zoologie, 27:142–243.Google Scholar
Moret, L. 1925. Contribution, à l'étude des Spongiares Siliceux du Crétacé Supérieur Francais. Mémoires de la Société Géologique de France, nouvelle series, Memoire 3, 338 p.Google Scholar
Reid, R. E. H. 1958. Upper Cretaceous Hexactinellida of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Part II. Palaeontographical Society, London, 26 p.Google Scholar
Reid, R. E. H. 1967. Tethys and the zoogeography of some modern and Mesozoic Porifera, p. 171–181. In Adams, C. G. and Ager, D. V. (eds.), Aspects of Tethyan Biogeography. Systematics Association Publication No. 7.Google Scholar
Reid, R. E. H. 1968. Bathymetric distributions of Calcarea and Hexactinellida in the present and in the past. Geological Magazine, 105:546–559.Google Scholar
Reid, R. E. H. 1969. Notes on hexactinellid sponges: 5, Verrucocoeloidea gen. nov, with a discussion of the genera Verrucocoelia Etallon and Periphragella Marshall. Journal of Natural History, 3:485–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rigby, J. K., and Mohanti, M. 1990. The first reported Middle Eocene sponge from India; a Raphidonema from the Fulra Limestone Formation, Kutch, India. Journal of Paleontology, 64:510–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, O. 1870. Grundzüge einer Spongienfauna des Atlantischen Gebietes. Leipzig, 88 p.Google Scholar
Schmidt, O. 1880. Die Spongien des Meerbusen von Mexico (und des Caraibischen Meeres). Zweites (Schluss-) Heft. Gustav Fischer, Jena, 89 p.Google Scholar
Schrammen, A. 1902. Neue Hexactinelliden aus der oberen Kreide. Mittheilungen aus dem Roemer-Museums, Hildesheim, 15:1–26.Google Scholar
Schrammen, A. 1903. Zur Systematik der Kieselspongien. Mittheilungen aus dem Roemer-Museums, Hildesheim, no. 19, 21 p.Google Scholar
Schrammen, A. 1912. Die Kieselspongien des oberen Kreide von Nordwestdeustschland, II, Triaxonia (Hexactinellida). Palaeontographica, Supplement 5:177–385.Google Scholar
Schulze, F. E. 1885. In Tizard, T. H., Mosely, H. W., Buchanan, M. A., and Murray, J., 1885. Narrative on the cruise of H.M.S. Challenger with a general account of the scientific results of the expedition. Report Scientific Research H.M.S. Challenger Narrative, i, first part, p. 437–451.Google Scholar
Schulze, F. E. 1887. Ueber den Bau und das System der Hexactinelliden, Abhandlungen der königlich preussischen Akadamie der Wissenschaften für 1886, 97 p.Google Scholar
Schulze, F. E. 1899. Amerikanische Hexactinelliden nach dem Materiale der Albatross-Expedition. Gustav Fischer, Jena, 126 p.Google Scholar
Semper, C. 1868. Einige neue Kieselschwämme der Philippinen. Verhandlungen der Physikalische-Medizinsche Gesellschaft zu Würzburg, 1:29–30.Google Scholar
Thomson, C. W. 1877. Voyage of the “Challenger,” The Atlantic. London, 2 volumes, 1,110 p.Google Scholar
Von Zittel, K. A. 1877–1878. Studien ueber fossile Spongien; 1 Abteilung, Hexactinellidae; 2 Abteilung, Lithistidae; 3 Abteilung, Monactinellidae, Tetractinellidae und Calcispongiae. Abhandlungen der königlichen Bayerischen Akademie, Mathematisch-Physicalische Klasse, Abteilung 1:1–63.Google Scholar