Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-cx56b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-25T09:01:15.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Madrynomya bruneti n. gen. and sp. (Bivalvia: ?Modiomorphidae): A Mesozoic survivor in the Tertiary of Patagonia?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Miguel Griffin
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de La Pampa, Av. Uruguay 151, L6300CLB Santa Rosa, La Pampa, Argentina,
Guido Pastorino
Affiliation:
Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, Av. Angel Gallardo 470 3° piso lab 57, C1405DJR Buenos Aires, Argentina,

Abstract

Madrynomya bruneti n. gen. and sp. is an undescribed bivalve collected from the late Miocene Puerto Madryn Formation in northern Patagonia. The specimens were collected together with other generally well-preserved mollusks from a parauthochtonous assemblage within a fine-grained sandstone. Based on their unique shell morphology, the specimens are placed in the Modiomorphoidea, a group of bivalves known only from the Paleozoic and Mesozoic. This conclusion is based on comparisons with other bivalve taxa such as Mytiloida, Dreissenidae, Modiomorphidae, Hippopodidae, and Anomalodesmata, which they resemble in different morphological features. However, careful inspection of key characters suggests that none of them are closely allied to this new genus, and placement in the Modiomorphidae is only tentative until more material is found and further characters, such as shell microstructure, can be properly analyzed. Likewise, an accurate reconstruction of this bivalve's life habit is presently impossible to determine with the two available specimens, but an endobyssate mode is probable, as has been inferred for Myoconcha.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, J. B. 1983. Middle Devonian Bivalvia from the Solsville Member (Marcellus Formation), Central New York State. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 174:193326.Google Scholar
Bayle, E., and Coquand, H. 1851. Mémoire sur les Fossiles recueillis dans le Chili par M. Ignace Domeyko et sur les terrains auxquels ils appartiennent. Mémoire de la Societé Géologique de France, sér. 2, 4:147.Google Scholar
Beu, A. G., and Maxwell, P. A. 1990. Cenozoic Mollusca of New Zealand. New Zealand Geological Survey Palaeontological Bulletin, 58:1518.Google Scholar
Brunet, R. F. J. 1995. New species of Mollusca from the Entrerriense Formation (Upper Miocene) of Chubut Province, Argentina and species not previously reported from this formation, Pt. 1, Gastropoda and Scaphopoda. Tulane Studies in Geology and Paleontology, 28:156.Google Scholar
Brunet, R. F. J. 1997. New species of Mollusca from the Entrerriense Formation (Upper Miocene) of Chubut Province, Argentina and species not previously reported from this formation, Pt. 2, Gastropoda. Tulane Studies in Geology and Paleontology, 30:6198.Google Scholar
Burckhardt, C. 1903. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Jura- und Kreideformation der Cordillere. Palaeontographica, 50:1144, pls. 1–6.Google Scholar
Carcelles, A. 1946. Observaciones sobre algunas especies actuales y fósiles de Trophon de la República Argentina. Notas del Museo de La Plata, 11 Zoología (93):5989.Google Scholar
Carter, J. G. 1990. Evolutionary significance of shell microstructure in the Palaeotaxodonta, Pteriomorphia and Isofilibranchia (Bivalvia: Mollusca), p. 135296. In Carter, J. G. (ed.), Skeletal Biomineralization: Patterns, Processes and Evolutionary Trends. Vol. 1. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.Google Scholar
Carter, J. G., Campbell, D. C., and Campbell, M. R. 2000. Cladistic perspectives on early bivalve evolution, p. 4779. In Harper, E. M., Taylor, J. D., and Crame, J. A. (eds.), The Evolutionary Biology of the Bivalvia. Special Publication 177. The Geological Society, London.Google Scholar
Cope, J. C. W. 1995. The early evolution of the Bivalvia, p. 361370. In Taylor, J. D. (ed.), Origin and Evolutionary Radiation of the Mollusca. Centenary Symposium of the Malacological Society of London. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cope, J. C. W. 2000. A new look at early bivalve phylogeny, p. 8195. In Harper, E. M., Taylor, J. D., and Crame, A. (eds.), The Evolutionary Biology of the Bivalvia. Special Publication 177. The Geological Society, London.Google Scholar
Cox, L. R. 1969. Family Hippopodidae, p. N583N584. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Pt. N(2). The Geological Society of America and The University of Kansas, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Cox, L. R., Newell, N. D., Boyd, D. W., Branson, C. C., Casey, R., Chavan, A., Coogan, A. H., Deschaseaux, C., Fleming, C. A., Haas, F., Hertlein, L. G., Fauffnab, E. G., Keen, A. M., Larocque, A., McAlester, A. L., Moore, R. C., Nuttall, C. P., Perkins, B. F., Puri, H. S., Smith, L. A., Soot-Ryen, T., Stenzel, H. B., Trueman, E. R., Turner, R. D., and Weir, J. 1969. Mollusca 6. Bivalvia, p. xxxviii + N1N952. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Pt. N-I. The Geological Society of America and the University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
da Costa, E. M. 1778. Historia Naturalis Testaceorum Britanniae, or, the British Conchology; Containing the Descriptions and Other Particulars of Natural History of the Shells of Great Britain and Ireland. Author, London, 254 p.Google Scholar
Dall, W. H. 1889. On the hinge of pelecypods and its development, with an attempt toward a better subdivision of the group. American Journal of Science, 38(3):445462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dall, W. H. 1900. Contributions to the Tertiary fauna of Florida, with special reference to the Miocene silex-beds of Tampa, and the Pliocene beds of the Caloosahatchie River, including in many cases a complete revision of the generic groups treated of and their American Tertiary species, Pt. 5, Teleodesmacea: Solen to Diplodonta . Transactions of the Wagner Free Institute of Science, Philadelphia, 3:9491218.Google Scholar
Damborenea, S. E. 2004. Early Jurassic Kalentera (Bivalvia) from Argentina and its palaeobiogeographical significance. Ameghiniana, 41:185198.Google Scholar
de Koninck, L. G. 1842. Description des animaux fossiles qui se trouvent dans le terrain carbonifère de Belgique. Liège, iv + 650, Atlas, pls. a–h, 1–55.Google Scholar
del Río, C. J. 1988. Bioestratigrafía y Cronoestratigrafía de la Formación Puerto Madryn (Mioceno medio)—Provincia del Chubut, Argentina. Anales de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Buenos Aires, 40:231254.Google Scholar
del Río, C. J. 1992. Middle Miocene bivalves of the Puerto Madryn Formation, Valdés Peninsule, Chubut Province, Argentina, Pt. I, Nuculidae–Pectinidae. Palaeontographica (A), 225:158.Google Scholar
del Río, C. J. 1994. Middle Miocene Bivalves of the Puerto Madryn Formation, Valdés Peninsule, Chubut Province, Argentina, Pt. II, Lucinidae–Pholadidae. Palaeontographica (A), 231:93132.Google Scholar
del Río, C. J. 2000. Malacofauna de las Formaciones Paraná y Puerto Madryn (Mioceno marino, Argentina): Su origen, composición y significado bioestratigráfico. Serie Correlación Geológica, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, (INSUGEO), 14:77101.Google Scholar
del Río, C. J., and Martínez Chiappara, S. 1998. Moluscos Miocenos de la Argentina y del Uruguay. Monografías de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Buenos Aires, 15:1151.Google Scholar
del Río, C. J., Martínez, S. A., and Scasso, R. A. 2001. Nature and origin of spectacular marine Miocene shell beds of northeastern Patagonia (Argentina): Paleoecological and bathymetric significance. Palaios, 16:325.Google Scholar
Fang, Zong-jie, and Morris, N. J. 1997. The genus Pseudosanguinolites and some modioliform bivalves (mainly Paleozoic). Paleoworld (Laboratory of Paleobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Academia Sinica), 7:4974.Google Scholar
Feruglio, E. 1933. I terrazzi marini della Patagonia. Giornale di Geologia, Annali del R. Museo Geologico di Bologna, 8 bis:1288.Google Scholar
Finlay, H. J. 1926. A further commentary on New Zealand molluscan systematics. Transactions and Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute, 57:320485. (Issued separately from volume 57 [issued 10 March 1927], 23 December 1926) Google Scholar
Fischer, P. 1887. Manuel de conquyliologie et de paléontologie conquyliologique, ou histoire naturelle des mollusques vivants et fósiles. F. Savay, Paris. (fascicule 11, p. 1009–1369, issued June 1887) Google Scholar
Fleming, C. A. 1959. Notes on New Zealand Recent and Tertiary Mussels (Mytilidae). Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 87(1–2):165178, pls. 13, 14.Google Scholar
Gabb, W. M. 1869. Description of the Cretaceous fossils. Geological Survey of California, Paleontology, 1, sec. 4:55.243, pls. 9–32.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. 1990. Modiomytilus, a new mytilid bivalve from the Tertiary of southern Patagonia. Journal of Paleontology, 64(3):377382.Google Scholar
Griffin, M., and Pastorino, G. 2005. The genus Trophon Monfort, 1810 (Gastropoda: Muricidae) in the Tertiary of Patagonia. Journal of Paleontology, 79(2):296311.Google Scholar
Haller, M. 1978. Estratigrafía de la región al poniente de Puerto Madryn. Actas del Segundo Congreso Geológico Argentino, 1:285297.Google Scholar
Hodges, P. 2000. The Early Jurassic Bivalvia from the Hettangian and Lower Sinemurian of south-west Britain. Monograph of the Palaeontographical Society (London) 614:164, i–vii, pls. 1–6.Google Scholar
Hörnes, M. 1870. Die fossilien Mollusken des Tertiær-Bekens von Wien. Abhandlungen der kaiserlich-königlichen geologischen Reichsanstalt, IV Band, II Band, Bivalven, p. 1479, pls. 1–85.Google Scholar
Ihering, H. von. 1897. Os molluscos dos terrenos terciarios da Patagonia. Revista do Museu Paulista, 2:217382.Google Scholar
Ihering, H. von. 1900. On the South American species of Mytilidae. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London, 4:8498.Google Scholar
Ihering, H. von. 1907. Les Mollusques fossiles du Tertiaire et du Crétacé supérieur de l'Argentine. Anales del Museo Nacional de Buenos Aires, serie 3, 7:1611.Google Scholar
Iredale, T. 1930. More notes on the marine Mollusca of New South Wales. Records of the Australian Museum, 17:384407.Google Scholar
Kelly, S. R. A. 2000. Appendix I: systematic descriptions of bivalves, p. 240246. In Kelly, S. R. A., Blanc, E., Price, S. P., and Whitman, A. G., Early Cretaceous Giant Bivalves from Seep-related Limestone Mounds, Wollaston Forland, Northeast Greenland [in Harper, E. M., Taylor, J. D, and Crame, J. A. (eds.), The Evolutionary Biology of the Bivalvia, Geological Society, London, special publication, 177:227–246].Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T., and Ichikawa, K. 1950. On the Upper Triassic Kochigatani series in the Sakawa Basin in Japan, and its Pelecypod-Faunas. 2. Late Triassic Mytilus, Volsella, Pleurophorus and Myoconcha from the Sakawa Basin in Shikoku, Japan. Journal of the Faculty of Sciences, University of Tokyo, section 2, Geology, Mineralogy, Geography, Seismology, 7:207215.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. B. 1799. Prodrome d'une nouvelle classification des coquilles, comprenant une rédaction appropriée des caractères génériques, et l'établissement d'un grand nombre de genres nouveaux. Mémories, Societé Histoire naturelle, Paris, 1:6391.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. B. 1819. Histoire Naturelle des Animaux sans Vertèbres, 6. Paris, 343 p.Google Scholar
Lamy, E. 1919. Les Moules et les Modioles de la Mer Rouge (d'après les Matériaux recuellis par M. le Dr. Jousseaume). Bulletin du Muséum national dHistoire naturelle, Paris, 5:4045, 109–114, 173–178.Google Scholar
Leanza, A. F. 1940. Myoconcha neuquena n. sp. del Lias de Piedra Pintada, en el Neuquén. Notas del Museo de La Plata, Paleontología, 5:123131.Google Scholar
Linné, C. von. 1758. Systema naturae per Regna Tria Naturae. Laurenti Salvii, Stockholm, 1 regnum animale, 824 p.Google Scholar
Marwick, J. 1953. Divisions and faunas of the Hokonui System (Triassic and Jurassic). Palaeontological Bulletin, New Zealand Geological Survey, 21:1142.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1877. The American Palaeozoic Fossils, a Catalogue of the Genera and Species. Author, Cincinnati, Ohio.Google Scholar
Morris, N. J. 1978. The infaunal descendants of the Cycloconchidae: An outline of the evolutionary history and taxonomy of the Heteroconchia, superfamilies Cycloconchacea to Chamacea. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 284:259275.Google Scholar
Morris, N., Dickins, J. M., and Astafieva-Urbaitis, K. 1991. Upper Paleozoic Anomalodesmatan Bivalvia. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History, (Geology), 47:51100.Google Scholar
Nevesskaya, L. A., Scarlato, O. A., Starobogatov, Y. I., and Eberzin, A. G. 1971. New ideas on bivalve systematics. Palaeontological Journal, 1971:141155.Google Scholar
Newell, N. D. 1957. Notes on certain primitive heterodont pelecypods. American Museum Novitates, 1857:114.Google Scholar
Newell, N. D. 1965. Classification of the Bivalvia. American Museum Novitates, 2206:125.Google Scholar
Newell, N. D., and Boyd, D. W. 1999. A new Lower Triassic Permophorus from the central Rocky mountains. American Museum Novitates, 3263:15.Google Scholar
Olsson, A. A. 1932. Contribution to the Tertiary Paleontology of northern Peru, Pt. 5, The Peruvian Miocene. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 19(68):1264.Google Scholar
Partsch, P. M. 1835. Ueber die sogenannten versteinerten Ziegenklauen aus dem Platten-See in Ungarn und ein neues urweltliches Geschlecht zweischaliger Conchylien. Annalen des Wiener Museums der Naturgeschichte, band 1:1100.Google Scholar
Philippi, R. A. 1899. Los Fósiles Secundarios de Chile. Brockhaus, Leipzig, p. 1104, pls. 1–42.Google Scholar
Pojeta, J., Zhang, R., and Yang, Z. 1986. Systematic Paleontology of Devonian pelecypods of Guanxi and Michigan, p. 57108. In Pojeta, J. (ed.), Devonian Rocks and Lower and Middle Devonian Pelecypods of Guanxi, China, and the Traverse Group of Michigan. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Papers, 1394G:57–108.Google Scholar
Röding, P. F. 1798. Museum Boltenianum, sive catalogus cimeliorum e trubus regnis naturae olim collegerat Joa. Fried. Bolten. Pars secunda. Typis Johan. Christi. Trapii, Hamburg, viii + 199 p.Google Scholar
Roveretto, G. 1921. Studi di geomorfologia argentina V. La Penisola Valdez. Bollettino della Societa Geologica Italiana, 40:147.Google Scholar
Runnegar, B. 1984. Evolutionary history of the bivalve subclass Anomalodesmata. Journal of Paleontology, 48(5):904939.Google Scholar
Scasso, R., del Río, C. J., MacArthur, J. M., and Martínez, S. 1999. Edades 87Sr/86Sr para el Entrerriense (Mioceno) de península Valdés, provincia del Chubut, Argentina. Resúmenes, XIV Congreso Geológico Argentino, p. 73.Google Scholar
Scasso, R., MacArthur, J. M., del Río, C. J., Martínez, S., and Thirlwall, M. F. 2001. 87Sr/86Sr Late Miocene age of fossil molluscs in the “Entrerriense” of the Valdés Península (Chubut, Argentina). Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 14:319327.Google Scholar
Soot-Ryen, T. 1955. A report on the family Mytilidae. The University of Southern California Publications, Alan Hancock Pacific Expeditions, 20(1):12170.Google Scholar
Soot-Ryen, T. 1959. Pelecypoda. Reports of the Lunds University Chile Expedition (1948–49), 35:186.Google Scholar
Sowerby, J. 1819. The Mineral Conchology of Great Britain, 3:1186, pls. 204–306 (1818–1821). Author, London.Google Scholar
Sowerby, J. de C. 1824. The Mineral Conchology of Great Britain, 5:1168, pls. 407–503 (1823–1825). Author, London.Google Scholar
Sowerby, J. de C. 1826. The Mineral Conchology of Great Britain, 6:1235, pls. 504–609 (1826–1829). Author, London.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1972. Functional morphology and evolution of byssally attached bivalve mollusks. Journal of Paleontology, 46(2):165212.Google Scholar
Stanton, T. W. 1947. Studies of some Comanche pelecypods and gastropods. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 211:1256, pls. 1–67.Google Scholar
Stewart, R. B. 1930. Gabb's California Cretaceous and Tertiary type Lamellibranchs. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia Special Publication, 3:1314.Google Scholar
Stilwell, J. D., and Zinsmeister, W. J. 1992. Molluscan systematics and biostratigraphy, Lower Tertiary La Meseta Formation, Seymour Island, Antarctic Peninsula. Antarctic Research Series, 55:1192.Google Scholar
Stoliczka, F. 1871. Cretaceous Fauna of southern India, 3. The Pelecypoda, with a review of all known genera of this class, fossil and Recent. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of India, Palaeontologia Indica, series 6, 3:1537, pls. 1–50.Google Scholar
Suter, H. 1914. Revision of the Tertiary Mollusca of New Zealand, based on type material, Pt. I. New Zealand Geological Survey Palaeontological Bulletin, 2:164.Google Scholar
Turton, W. 1840. A Manual of the Land and Fresh-water Shells of the British Islands, with Figures of Each of the Kinds. (revised edition by Gray, J. E.). London, ix, [i], 324 p., 12 pls.Google Scholar
van der Poel, L. 1959. Faune malacologique du Hervien. Bulletin de l'Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, 35(15):126; (16):1–28.Google Scholar
van Winkle, K. 1919. Remarks on some new species from Trinidad. Bulletins of American Palaeontology, 8(33):1933.Google Scholar
Ward, W. L., and Blackwelder, B. 1975. Chesapecten, a new genus of Pectinidae (Mollusca: Bivalvia) from the Miocene and Pliocene of eastern North America. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Papers, 861:124.Google Scholar
Weaver, C. 1931. Paleontology of the Jurassic and Cretaceous of west central Argentina. Memoir University of Washington, 1:1469.Google Scholar
Wilson, B. 1967. A new generic name for three recent and one fossil species of Mytilidae (Mollusca: Bivalvia) in southern Australia, with redescriptions of the species. Proceedings of the Malacological Society, London, 37:279295.Google Scholar
Zinsmeister, W. J., Marshall, L. G., Drake, R. E., and Curtis, G. H. 1981. First radioisotope (Potassium–Argon) age of marine Neogene Rionegro beds in northeastern Patagonia, Argentina. Science, 212:440.Google Scholar