Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-w7rtg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-18T01:00:08.600Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Calcium dissolution and clay flocculant removal in pollen extractions from sediments of the arid Southwest, U.S.A.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Scott T. Clay-Poole
Scott T. Clay-Poole*
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff 86011–5640
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Pollen extraction from sediments of the arid Southwest often involves a variety of problems, including low concentration and poor preservation of pollen, but particularly the complexing of soil particles and evaporites such as calcium carbonate (calcite) and calcium sulfate (gypsum) with the pollen. The low pollen concentration and particle complexing problems are overcome by extraction of a larger volume of sediment (normally 350–450 cc) than is typical for lakes and bogs of temperate regions. Dilute HCl dissolves the most common evaporite, calcium carbonate, and coarser silicates are then removed by sieving or swirling (Funkhauser and Evitt, 1959), thus concentrating finer silts, clays, clay-sized particles, and pollen. The finer silicates are subsequently removed by HF treatment. However, if the calcium ions are not removed completely, prior to the HF treatment, a precipitate of calcium fluoride forms which obscures pollen in the sample.

Type
Paleontological Notes
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 64 , Issue 3 , May 1990 , pp. 483 - 484
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bates, C. D., Coxon, P., and Gibbard, P. L. 1978. A new method for the preparation of clay-rich sediment samples for palynological investigation. New Phytologist, 81:459–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodine, M. W. Jr., and Fernalld, T. H. 1973. EDTA dissolution of gypsum, anhydrite, and Ca-Mg carbonates. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 43:1152–1156.Google Scholar
Doher, L. 1980. Palynomorph preparation procedures currently used in the paleontology and stratigraphy laboratories, United States Geological Survey. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 830.Google Scholar
Funkhauser, J. W., and Evitt, W. R. 1959. Preparation techniques for acid-insoluble microfossils. Micropaleontology, 5:369–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosanke, R. M. 1950. Pennsylvanian spores of Illinois and their use in correlation. Illinois State Geology Survey Bulletin 74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueger, B. F. 1986. Use of EDTA for palynormorph extraction from evaporites. Journal of Paleontology, 60:189–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar