Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55b6f6c457-85hf2 Total loading time: 0.264 Render date: 2021-09-28T02:34:52.943Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Widespread occurrence of microscopic pores in conulariids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Heyo Van Iten
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Hanover College, Hanover, Indiana 47243,
Zdenka Vyhlasova
Affiliation:
West Bohemian Museum in Pilsen, Kopeckého sady, 301 00, Pilsen, Czech Republic,
Mao-Yan Zhu
Affiliation:
Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Academia Sinica, Chi-Ming-Ssu, Nanjing 210008, People's Republic of China,
Qian Yi
Affiliation:
Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Academia Sinica, Chi-Ming-Ssu, Nanjing 210008, People's Republic of China,

Extract

Students of conulariids have published a number of papers addressing the systematics and phylogenetic affinities of this intriguing group of marine metazoans (e.g., Kiderlen, 1937; Termier and Termier, 1949; Moore and Harrington, 1956; Werner, 1966, 1967; Kozlowski, 1968; Bischoff, 1978; Steul, 1984; Babcock and Feldmann, 1986a, 1986b; Babcock et al., 1987; Babcock, 1991; Van Iten, 1991, 1992a, 1992b; Jerre, 1994; Babcock et al., 1995; Brood, 1995; McKinney et al., 1995; Van Iten et al., 1996; Hughes et al., 2000; Van Iten et al., 2000; Collins, 2002). Hughes et al. (2000, p. 832), for example, argued that conulariids are an extinct order of scyphozoan cnidarians, suggesting further that the autapomorphies of the order Conulariida “may include” a “steeply pyramidal, phosphatic exoskeleton [showing] biradial symmetry [and having] flat facets bisected by midlines and separated by angular corners.” Under this concept, Conulariida can be interpreted to consist not only of Conularia Miller in Sowerby, 1821 and other post-Cambrian genera (e.g., Paraconularia Sinclair, 1940) traditionally placed within this taxon, but also of conulariid-like small shelly fossils, including Arthrochites Chen, 1982, Carinachites Qian, 1977, and Emeiconularia Qian, Van Iten, Cox, Zhu, and Zhuo, 1997, from the Lower Cambrian (Qian, 1989; Qian et al., 1997). However, previous work on the microstructure of conulariid-like small shelly taxa (Qian and Bengtson, 1989; Conway Morris and Chen, 1992; Qian et al., 1997) revealed certain differences between them and true conulariids. These differences, including the apparent absence of skeletal lamination in the small shelly fossils, suggest that assessments of the phylogenetic affinities of conulariids should also consider microstructural characters.

Type
Paleontological Notes
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babcock, L. E. 1991. The enigma of conulariid affinities, p. 133143. In Simonetta, A. M. and Conway Morris, S. (eds.), The Early Evolution of Metazoa and the Significance of Problematic Taxa. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Babcock, L. E., and Feldmann, R. M. 1986a. The phylum Conulariida, p. 135147. In Hoffman, A. and Nitecki, M. H. (eds.), Problematic Fossil Taxa. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Babcock, L. E., and Feldmann, R. M. 1986b. Devonian and Mississippian conulariids of North America, Pt. A, General description and Conularia. Annals of Carnegie Museum, 55:349410.Google Scholar
Babcock, L. E., Feldmann, R. M., and Wilson, M. T. 1987. Teratology and pathology of some Paleozoic conulariids. Lethaia, 20:93105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babcock, L. E., Lang, J., and Yahaya, M. 1995. First Carboniferous conulariids from Niger (West Africa). Journal of African Earth Sciences, 20:16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrande, J. 1867. Système Silurien du centre de la Bohême. Ière Partie. Tome 3. Classe des Mollusques. Ordre des Ptéropodes. Charles Bellmann, Prague, 179 p.Google Scholar
Billings, E. 1866. Catalogues of the Silurian fossils of the Island of Anticosti, with descriptions of some new genera and species. Geological Survey of Canada, Separate Report, Publication No. 427, 93 p.Google Scholar
Billings, E. 1872. On some new species of Palaeozoic fossils. American Journal of Science, third series, 3:352360.Google Scholar
Bischoff, G. C. O. 1978. Internal structures of conulariid tests and their functional significance, with special reference to Circonulariina n. suborder (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa). Senckenbergiana Lethaia, 59:275327.Google Scholar
Bischoff, G. C. O. 1989. Byroniida new order from early Paleozoic strata of eastern Australia (Cnidaria, thecate scyphopolyps). Senckenhergiana Lethaia, 69:467521.Google Scholar
Bouček, B. 1928. Révision des conulaires Paléozoïques de la Bohême. Palaeontographica Bohemiae, 11:60108.Google Scholar
Bouček, B. 1939. Conularida, p. A113A131. In Schindewolf, O. H. (ed.), Handbuch der Paläozoologie, Band 2A. Verlag von Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin.Google Scholar
Brood, K. 1995. Morphology, structure, and systematics of the conulariids. Geologiska Fóreningens i Stockholm Fórhandlingar, 117:121138.Google Scholar
Chen, M. 1982. The new knowledge of the fossil assemblages from Maidiping section, Emei County, Sichuan with reference to the Sinian–Cambrian boundary. Scientia Geologica Sinica, 7:253262. (In Chinese with English summary)Google Scholar
Cleland, H. F. 1911. The fossils and stratigraphy of the Middle Devonic of Wisconsin. Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey Bulletin, 21:1222.Google Scholar
Collins, A. G. 2002. Phylogeny of Medusozoa and the evolution of cnidarian life cycles. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 15:418432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway Morris, S., and Chen, M. 1992. Carinachitiids, hexangulaconulariids and Punctatus: problematic metazoans from the Early Cambrian of South China. Journal of Paleontology, 66:386406.Google Scholar
Foerste, A. F. 1928. American Arctic and related cephalopods. Denison University Bulletin, Journal of the Scientific Laboratories, 23:1110.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1847. Paleontology of New York. Vol. I. Containing Descriptions of the Organic Remains of the Lower Division of the New-York System (equivalent to the Lower Silurian rocks of Europe). C. Van Benthuysen, Albany, 338 p.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1858. Descriptions of new species of fossils from the Carboniferous limestones of Indiana and Illinois. Albany Institute, Transactions, 4:136.Google Scholar
Hughes, N. C., Gunderson, G. O., and Weedon, M. J. 2000. Late Cambrian conulariids from Wisconsin and Minnesota. Journal of Paleontology, 74:828838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jerre, F. 1994. Anatomy and phylogenetic significance of Eoconularia loculata, a conulariid from the Silurian of Gotland. Lethaia, 27:97109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiderlen, H. 1937. Die Conularien. Über Bau and Leben der ersten Scyphozoa. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Beilige-Band, 77:113169.Google Scholar
Kozlowski, R. 1968. Nouvelles observations sur les conulaires. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 13:497531.Google Scholar
Ladd, H. S. 1929. The stratigraphy and paleontology of the Maquoketa shale of Iowa. Pt. I. Iowa Geological Survey Annual Reports, 34:305448.Google Scholar
Luo, H., Jiang, Z., Wu, X., Song, X., and Ouyang, L. 1982. The Sinian–Cambrian boundary in Eastern Yunnan. People's Publishing House, Yunnan, 265 p. (In Chinese with English summary)Google Scholar
Matthew, G. F. 1899. Studies on Cambrian faunas, no. 3: Upper Cambrian fauna of Mt. Stephen, British Columbia. Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada, series 2, 5:3966.Google Scholar
McKinney, F. K., Devolvé, J.-J., and Sobieraj, J. 1995. Conularia sp. from the Pyrénées: further support for scyphozoan affinities of the Conularida. Lethaia, 28:229236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, R. C., and Harrington, H. J. 1956. Conulata, p. F54F66. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. F, Coelenterata. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Qian, Y. 1977. Hyolitha and some problematica from the Lower Cambrian Meishucun Stage in central and S.W. China. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 16:255275. (In Chinese with English summary)Google Scholar
Qian, Y. 1989. Early Cambrian small shelly fossils of China with special reference to the Precambrian—Cambrian boundary. Stratigraphy and Palaeontology of Systematic Boundaries in China. Precambrian–Cambrian Boundary, 2:1341.Google Scholar
Qian, Y., and Bengtson, S. 1989. Palaeontology and biostratigraphy of the early Cambrian Meishucunian Stage in Yunnan Province, south China. Fossils and Strata, 24:1156.Google Scholar
Qian, Y., Van Iten, H., Cox, R. S., Zhu, M. Y., and Zhuo, E. J. 1997. A brief account of Emeiconularia trigemme, a new genus and species of protoconulariid. Acta Micropalaeontologica Sinica, 14:475488.Google Scholar
Raymond, P. E. 1905. The fauna of the Chazy limestone. American Journal of Science, series 4, 20:353382.Google Scholar
Reed, F. R. C. 1933. Some new Ordovician species of Conularia from Girvan. Geological Magazine, 70:354358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, G. W. 1940. The genotype of Conularia. Canadian Field-Naturalist, 54:7274.Google Scholar
Sinclair, G. W. 1942. The Chazy Conularida and their congeners. Annals of Carnegie Museum, 29:219240.Google Scholar
Sinclair, G. W. 1943. A new genus of Conularids. Canadian Field-Naturalist, 57:123.Google Scholar
Sinclair, G. W. 1944. Notes on the genera Archaeoconularia and Eoconularia. Royal Society of Canada, Section IV, Transactions, series 3, 38:8795.Google Scholar
Sinclair, G. W. 1952. A classification of the Conulariida. Fieldiana Geology, 10:135145.Google Scholar
Sowerby, J. 1821. The Mineral Conchology of Great Britain; or Coloured Figures and Descriptions of those Remains of Testaceous Animals or Shells, which have been Preserved at Various Times, and Depths in the Earth. Vol. 3, Pt. 46. W. Arding, London, p. 107118.Google Scholar
Steul, H. 1984. Die systematische Stellung der Conularien. Giessener Geologische Schriften, 37:1117.Google Scholar
Termier, H., and Termier, G. 1949. Position systématique et biologie des Conulaires. Revue Scientifique, 86:711722.Google Scholar
Van Iten, H. 1991. Evolutionary affinities of conulariids, p. 145155. In Simonetta, A. M. and Conway Morris, S. (eds.), The Early Evolution of Metazoa and the Significance of Problematic Taxa. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Van Iten, H. 1992a. Morphology and phylogenetic significance of the corners and midlines of the conulariid test. Palaeontology, 35:335358.Google Scholar
Van Iten, H. 1992b. Microstructure and growth of the conulariid test: implications for conulariid affinities. Palaeontology, 36:359372.Google Scholar
Van Iten, H. 1994. Redescription of Glyptoconularia Sinclair, an Ordovician conulariid from North America, p. 363366. In Landing, E. (ed.), Studies in Honor of Donald W. Fisher. New York State Museum and Geological Survey Bulletin, No. 481.Google Scholar
Van Iten, H., Cox, R. S., and Mapes, R. H. 1992. New data on the morphology of Sphenothallus Hall: implications for its affinities. Lethaia, 25:135144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Iten, H., Fitzke, J. A., and Cox, R. S. 1996. Problematical fossil cnidarians from the Upper Ordovician of the north-central USA. Palaeontology, 39:10371064.Google Scholar
Van Iten, H., Zhu, Z. K., and Zhu, M. Y. 2000. Anatomy and systematics of the Devonian conulariids Changshaconus Zhu, 1985 and Reticulaconularia Babcock and Feldmann, 1986. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 39:466475.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1875. Descriptions of new species of fossils from the Trenton limestone. New York State Museum of Natural History, 28th Annual Report (Senate Document 71), p. 9397.Google Scholar
Werner, B. 1966. Stephanoscyphus (Scyphozoa, Coronatae) und seine direkte Abstammung von den fossilen Conulata. Helgoländer Wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen, 13:317347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, B. 1967. Stephanoscyphus Allman (Scyphozoa, Coronatae), ein rezenter Vertreter der Conulata? Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 41:137153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, C. A. 1880. Fossils of the Indiana rocks. Indiana Department of Statistics and Geology, Second Annual Report, p. 471552.Google Scholar
Želízko, J. V. 1921. Aquivalente der untersilurischen Euloma-Niobefauna bei Plzenec im Böhmen. Videnskabs-Selskabet i Christiania, Matematisk-Naturvidenskabelig Klasse, Skrifter Band 2, No. 10, p. 127.Google Scholar
Zhu, M. Y., Van Iten, H., Cox, R. S., Zhao, Y. L., and Erdtmann, B. D. 2000. Occurrence of Byronia Matthew and Sphenothallus Hall in the Lower Cambrian of China. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 74:227238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Widespread occurrence of microscopic pores in conulariids
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Widespread occurrence of microscopic pores in conulariids
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Widespread occurrence of microscopic pores in conulariids
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *